Introduction: Positive professional practice environments are crucial to safeguard a healthy and safe working conditions for health workforce, including nurses; so as to ensure provision of quality healthcare and safety of patient. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study to assess nurses’ perceptions towards nursing practice environment and factors associated with their perceptions. A validated Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PESNWI) questionnaire was administered to nurses working in two Ministry of Health hospitals. The questionnaire comprises of five subscales: Participation, Foundation, Managers Support, Workforce Adequacy and Physician/Nurse Relations. Mean scores of >2.50 were considered as favourable, and ≤2.50 were considered as unfavourable. Simple linear and multiple linear regression analysis were employed to identify factors associated with their perceptions. Analysis was carried out using STATA version 14.0. Results: A total of 366 respondents took part in the study, with a response rate of 98.4%. Majority were working shift (89.6%) and working extended hours (62.3%). In general, the nursing practice environments were rated as favourable. Overall mean score was 2.90±0.03 and four out of five subscales’ mean scores were >2.50. Foundation for quality nursing care was perceived as the most favourable subscale, while workforce adequacy was perceived as the least favourable. There were statistically significant association between working extended hours, doing double shift and working during day off with perceived unfavourable workforce adequacy. Conclusion: Nursing practice environment was perceived as favourable in the studied hospitals. Policy makers, service providers, and hospital managers could explore further on human resource planning and management of nursing personnel to tackle the issue of nurse staffing in the country.

Background: Household ability to pay (ATP) and public willingness to pay (WTP) for cataract surgery and obstetric consultation, the two commonly utilised private healthcare services in Malaysian public hospitals are largely unknown. This study assessed the patients’ ATP and the WTP for these services. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among respondents visiting outpatient clinics in an urban tertiary public hospital. Source of payment for healthcare used by the World Health Survey was used to assess ATP, while contingent valuation was used to elicit respondents’ WTP by asking their WTP for a shorter waiting time for cataract surgery or an obstetric consultation. Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact tests, and binary logistic regression were performed in the analyses. Results: No significant differences were observed for ATP between public and private respondents. Almost one quarter (23.5%) of total respondents used unaffordable sources for their healthcare services. More than a quarter (26.7%) of the public respondents were willing to pay for private user fees or higher and a proportion of them (14.8%) reported using unaffordable sources for healthcare services. Logistic regression showed that respondents reporting multiple affordable sources of payment were 3.7 times more likely to be willing to pay for these services after adjusting for other factors, compared with the use of a single affordable source. Conclusion Although the majority reported using affordable sources of payment for health services, a small fraction claimed the use of unaffordable resources. The use of multiple affordable sources for healthcare payment influences WTP in seeking private services for cataract surgery and obstetric consultation.