1.Validity and reliability of the Chinese parent proxy and child self-report health related quality of life measure for children with epilepsy (CHEQOL-25) in Malaysia
Su Woan Wo ; Pauline Siew Mei Lai ; Lai Choo Ong ; Wah Yun Low ; Kheng Seang Lim ; Chee Geap Tay ; Chee Piau Wong ; Ranjini Sivanesom
Neurology Asia 2016;21(3):235-245
Objective: To determine the validity and reliability of the Chinese parent proxy and child self-report
health related quality of life measure for children with epilepsy (CHEQOL-25) in Malaysia. Methods:
Face and content validity of the Chinese parent proxy and child self-report CHEQOL-25 was verified
by an expert panel, and piloted in five children with epilepsy (CWE). The Chinese CHEQOL-25 was
then administered to 40 parent proxies and their CWE (aged 8-18 years), from two tertiary hospitals,
at baseline and 2 weeks later. Results: Forty parents and their CWE were recruited. Cronbach’s alpha
for each subscale ranged from 0.56-0.83. At test-retest, the interclass correlation for all items ranged
from 0.68-0.97. Items 8 and 25 were removed as their corrected item-total correlation values were
<0.3. Epilepsy severity, the number of anti-epileptic drugs taken daily, number of close friends and
number of time spent with friends were found to be associated with the parent proxy CHEQOL-25
score. Duration of epilepsy, child’s cognitive ability, number of close friends and number of time spent
with friends were associated with child self-report CHEQOL-25. The parent proxy and the child selfreport
showed high to fair agreement on the “interpersonal/social” [Intraclass correlation coefficient
(ICC)=0.670, p<0.001] and “epilepsy secrecy” subscale (ICC=0.417, p=0.048).
Conclusions: Our small study found that the Chinese CHEQOL-25 was a valid and reliable questionnaire
to assess the quality of life of children with epilepsy from the parent prospective and child self-report
when items 8 and 25 were removed.
Epilepsy
2.Phase II trial of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in inoperable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Whay Kuang CHIA ; Simon ONG ; Han Chong TOH ; Siew Wan HEE ; Su Pin CHOO ; Donald Y H POON ; Miah Hiang TAY ; Chee Kiat TAN ; Wen Hsin KOO ; Kian Fong FOO
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2008;37(7):554-558
INTRODUCTIONAdvanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a dismal prognosis and is notoriously chemo-resistant. We conducted a Phase II prospective study to evaluate the activity and tolerability of gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemo-naïve advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The trial considered a "no further interest" response rate of 10% and a target response rate of 30%. Utilising a Simon's minimax two-stage design with a type I error of 0.05 and power of 80%, 25 subjects would be required. Fifteen patients would be needed in stage 1 and if fewer than 2 responses were observed, the trial would be stopped and lack of efficacy claimed.
MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients with advanced HCC, diagnosed based on histology or by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, were administered gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 of a 21-day schedule. Assessment of response based on computer tomography was performed after every 2 cycles of chemotherapy.
RESULTSThe trial was stopped early due to a lack of efficacy. A total of 15 patients were accrued. Twelve patients were hepatitis B positive and the other 3 patients were negative for both hepatitis B and C. Only 1 patient had a history of prior heavy alcohol use. Two patients had Child C liver cirrhosis, 5 patients had Child B cirrhosis, and the remaining 8 patients had Child A cirrhosis. This regime was well tolerated and there was only 1 patient who experienced grade IV toxicities. Only 5 of 15 patients experienced grade III toxicities (nausea and emesis, 1 patient; anemia, 1 patient; thrombocytopenia, 1 patient; and neutropaenia, 2 patients). Only 1 patient experienced a partial response to the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin. A further 3 patients experienced stable disease and 11 patients progressed on chemotherapy. The median time to progression was 6 weeks. The progression-free curve showed a sharp descent in the initial part of the study, suggesting that many patients had disease progression after enrollment. The median overall survival was 18 weeks.
CONCLUSIONThe progression-free survival and overall survival in our study were extremely short. Based on the results of our phase 2 study, we are unable to recommend further studies utilising gemcitabine and cisplatin combination in patients with advanced HCC.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; Deoxycytidine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome
3.Paediatric asthma clinical pathway: Impact on cost and quality of care
Shakirah Md.Sharif ; Jamalludin Ab Rahman ; Hasniah Abdul Latif ; Rus Anida Awang ; Mariana Daud ; Ahmad Fadzil Abdullah ; Dayang Zuraini Sahadan ; Su Siew Choo ; Ramli Zainal ; Samsinah Hussain ; Norzila Mohamed Zainudin
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2019;74(2):138-144
INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled asthma may cause an
increase in healthcare utilisation, hospital admission and
productivity loss. With the increasing burden of asthma in
Malaysia, strategies aimed at reducing cost of care should
be explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if a
clinical pathway (CPW) for inpatient paediatric asthma
would reduce average length of stay (ALOS), improve
asthma management and decrease cost.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental, pre-post study was used
to evaluate the CPW effectiveness. Paediatric inpatients
aged 5-18 years old, admitted for acute asthma exacerbation
from September 2015 to April 2016 were prospectively
recruited. Data from patients admitted from January-July
2015 were used as control. CPW training was carried out in
August 2015 using standardised modules. Direct admission
cost from the provider's prospective was calculated.
Outcomes compared were differences in ALOS, discharge
medication, readmission within 28 days of discharge and
cost.
RESULTS: ALOS is 26 hours lower in the CPW group for
severe exacerbations and underlying uncontrolled asthma
(19.2 hours) which is clinically significant as patients have
shorter hospital stay. More newly-diagnosed intermittent
asthmatics were discharged with relievers in the CPW group
(p-value 0.006). None of the patients in the CPW group had
readmissions (p-value 0.16). Mean treatment cost for
patients in the intervention group is higher at RM843.39 (SD
±48.99, versus RM779.21 SD±44.33).
CONCLUSION: This study found that management using a
CPW may benefit asthmatic patients with uncontrolled
asthma admitted with severe exacerbation. Further studies
will be needed to explore CPW's impact on asthma
management starting from the emergency department.