No abstract available in English.
Clinical Study

No abstract available in English.
Clinical Study

No abstract available in English.
Clinical Study

Background: In 2009, the World Health Organization revised the Dengue Fever guidelines to more accurately identify patients at risk of developing severe dengue. Despite these guidelines, early diagnosis of severe dengue remains challenging for clinicians. Several scoring systems have been developed to identify patients at highest risk for severe dengue however; these studies have a study population limited to children and did not include adult patients. Objective: The purpose of this study is to validate the Simple Clinical Risk Score in predicting who will develop severe Dengue among adult patients with Dengue fever. Methods: This is a prospective cohort, single-center, observational study conducted at Silliman University Medical Center from August 2019 to August 2020. A total of 481 laboratory confirmed dengue patients were included and categorized into two models based on the day of illness. Each model used a clinical risk score of 1 point as a cut-off for predicting severe Dengue. Validation was done using the risk-odds ratio and substantiated by the odds ratio, signifying that there is more likely greater association between dengue patients to develop severe dengue. Results: In model 1, a total of 339 patients were analyzed with 6 patients who achieved a score of 1 developed severe Dengue. In model 2, a total of 142 patients were analyzed and 3 patients who achieved a score of 1 developed severe dengue. Conclusion The simple clinical risk score can assist clinicians in deciding and stratifying dengue patients who need hospitalization not only in resource-limited areas but also during this height of the pandemic. While the findings had a lesser number of participants, it still remained context-specific and is able to demonstrate a predictive ability for severe disease, thereby optimizing informed decisions for hospital admissions in settings with limited laboratory resources.
Validation Study

No abstract available.
Clinical Study* ; Female* ; Humans

During many years, we often implemented the program of epidemiological field training and some cadres participated to these courses in Thai Lan. In order to help understanding about the origine and the development of this training program, the author translated briefly Stephen B. Thacker’s documents published in the International Journal of Epidemiology. The article named Applied epidemiology for the 21st century. The Vietnamese title was made by the author.
Epidemiologic Study ; Education

During massive transfusions especially under pressure, considerable hemolysis has been expected. It had been assumed that hernolysis would increase with increasing age of the bank blood, increasing pressure and with decreasing bore of the needle. Moss and Stauntan, however, found that hemolysis actually increased when blood was forced through larger bore needles. The authors have studied the magnitude of hemolysis according to various needle sizes under ordinary clinical transfusion conditions, and concluded as follows: 1) Hemolysis was maximum when a 18G needle was used and minimum with use of a 22G. needle regardless of the age and temperature of the bank blood, 2) Hemolysis increased with increasing age of the bank blood. 3) When the needle size was constant, hemolysis was not affected by warming of the bank blood.
Clinical Study* ; Hemolysis* ; Needles

Small ; Study of epidemiology ; Malaria

No abstract available in English.
Acetabulum ; Clinical Study

No abstract available in English.
Clinical Study ; Neck