[Objective] To compare the axial length (AL) measured with IOLMaster and contact A-Scan in eyes with macular edema (ME) and to investigate the correlation between measurement difference and foveal thickness.[Methods] Sixty-seven ME eyes of 42 patients (ME group) and 40 healthy eyes of 30participants (control group) were enrolled in this study.Foveal thickness was measured with 3D optical coherence topography (OCT)-1000.The AL was prospectively measured by IOLMaster and contact A-scan,The correlation between measurement difference and foveal thickness was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.[Results] Mean foveal thickness of ME eyes was (377.85± 119.84) μm.Mean AL by IOLMaster and contact A-scan were (22.95±0.97) mm and (22.82±1.04) mm in ME group,and (23.21±1.08) mm and (23.17 ± 1.15) mm in the control group respectively.The difference between two groups was statistically significant (t=-3.102,P=0.003).There was no correlation between measurement difference and foveal thickness in ME group (r=-0.097; P =0.447).[Conclusion]s There is a difference of AL measurements using contact A-scan and IOLMaster in ME eyes.However,there was no correlation between measurement difference and the foveal thickness.

Objective: To explore the effect of improved V-Y advancement flap with major artery perforator on repairing several skin and soft tissue defects in whole body. Methods: From March 2015 to June 2017, 4 cases with pressure ulcer in sacrococcygeal region, 4 cases with pressure ulcer at ischial tuberosity, 2 cases with scalp and skull defects at occiput, 1 case with secondary wound after tumor resection in axillary region, and 2 cases with skin and soft tissue defects caused by other trauma were hospitalized, with disease duration ranging from 1 week to 6 months. Bones, blood vessels, or nerves were exposed in wounds of 11 cases. After debridement, wounds with area ranging from 5 cm×4 cm to 15 cm×12 cm were repaired by improved V-Y advancement flap with major artery perforator including occipital artery perforator, arteria glutaea perforator, intercostal artery perforator, and peroneal artery perforator, and the area of flap ranged from 11 cm×5 cm to 35 cm×20 cm. Distal end of flaps additionally carried 1 major artery perforator in 4 cases. Results: All flaps survived well without hemodynamic disorder, and wounds and donor sites healed well. During the follow-up for 3 to 18 months, the flaps were good in appearance with similar color and texture to normal skin around wound and without recurrence of rupture. Conclusions Compared with traditional V-Y advancement flap, the improved V-Y advancement flap with major artery perforator has the advantages of larger repair area, longer advance distance without tension, simple operation, and good appearance after operation, which is beneficial to clinical application.