INTRODUCTIONIt is uncommon for medical students to deliver public health talks as part of their medical education curriculum. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel training programme that required medical students to deliver public health talks during their family medicine (FM) clerkship in a Singapore primary care institution.

METHODSThe FM faculty staff guided teams of third-year medical students to select appropriate topics for health talks that were to be conducted at designated polyclinics. The talks were video-recorded and appraised for clarity, content and delivery. The appraisal was done by the student's peers and assigned faculty staff. The audience was surveyed to determine their satisfaction level and understanding of the talks. The students also self-rated the effectiveness of this new teaching activity.

RESULTSA total of 120 medical students completed a questionnaire to rate the effectiveness of the new teaching activity. 85.8% of the students felt confident about the delivery of their talks, 95.8% reported having learnt how to deliver talks and 92.5% perceived this new training modality as useful in their medical education. Based on the results of the audience survey, the speakers were perceived as knowledgeable (53.1%), confident (51.3%) and professional (39.0%). Assessment of 15 video-recorded talks showed satisfactory delivery of the talks by the students.

CONCLUSIONThe majority of the students reported a favourable overall learning experience under this new training programme. This finding is supported by the positive feedback garnered from the audience, peers of the medical students and the faculty staff.

Adult ; Curriculum ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Family Practice ; education ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Program Evaluation ; Public Health ; education ; Singapore ; Students, Medical ; Teaching ; education ; Video Recording

Background: Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a treatment for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Nevertheless, there are disparities in the technique employed, including combining it with pedicle ligation. We aimed to investigate if short-term clinical outcomes were different between patients undergoing LHP with and without pedicle. Methods: Patients who underwent LHP from a prospective registry of 3 centers were identified. Demographics, severity, symptoms, operative technique, post-operative pain, complications, and recurrence were investigated. Sub-investigation of patients with simultaneous pedicle ligation, and without, was performed. Statistical analysis was done using the χ2 test. P values <0.05 were noted as statistically significant. Results: One hundred and two patients (59.8% male) of a mean age of 45 years were assessed. Most (62.7%) had 3rd degree hemorrhoids. Median operative time was 24 minutes (10-60 minutes) minutes. Post-operative length of stay was 26 hours (2-168 hours) hours. Median pain score 24 hours post-operatively was 0/10. The general complication percentage was 26.5%, but majority complications were self-limiting. The most common complication was post-operative swelling (16 patients; 15.7%). Post-operative bleeding was seen in 9 patients (8.8%) at a median of 7 (1-14) days, 3 of whom needed operation and readmission. Then 4 patients (3.9%) had moderate-to-severe pain (pain score of more than 5/10), 2 patients (2.0%) developed ulceration and 3 patients (2.9%) had recurrence, were treated conservatively. Patients with pedicle ligation had a higher complication (33.3% vs. 14.8%; p=0.08), mainly bleeding and swelling but not statistically significant. Conclusions LHP demonstrates good short-term outcomes with minimal complication and recurrence incidences. Supplementary ligation of pedicles does not provide additional benefits, and in fact, may worsen outcomes.
Hemorrhoids