Objective To investigate the measures to improve the newborn hearing screening quality.Methods835 cases of neonates using distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearing screening,after first,second and third hearing screening,the final 5 cases failed,diagnosed by ABR screening hearing handicap in 3 cases.Experience constantly was summed up during screening process to improve screening quality.Results835 newborns were screened.The rate of failing to hearing screening was 0.60％,the rate of hearing impairment diagnosed by ABR was 0.36％,and the positive proportion of hearing screening was 0.24％.ConclusionOur experience during screening progress is to take some measures to improve the newborn hearing screening quality,with reducing false positives and avoiding false negatives,by choosing screening time,cleaning external ear and electric-otoscopy examination,environmental noise control,updating test procedures according to the physiology and development of the newborns,testing calibration instruments of otoacoustic emissions hearing screening,selecting suitable earplug,probe with correct plsce,and combining acoustic impedance examination,with a long term follow-up of listening in high risk neonates with passing screening.

Objective:To evaluate the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) on flap surgery in animal models.Methods:Nine databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CBM, CNKI, and WANFANG database) were searched for published literature comparing the effects of BTXA (BTXA group) versus saline or no treatment (control group) on flap operation in animal models from January 1979 to March 2022. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Indicators included flap survival rate, blood flow and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression level after surgery. The subjects were divided into pre-operation injection group and intraoperation injection group according to the intervention timing, and were divided into random flap group and axial flap group according to the type of flaps, and subgroup analysis was conducted respectively. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software and Stata 15.1 software were used for all statistical analysis.Results:A total of 603 animals from 19 studies were included after rigorous inclusion and exclusion screening. Compared with control group, BTXA group revealed a significantly higher flap survival rate [mean difference ( MD)=15.65%, 95% CI: 13.11%-18.19%, Z=12.08, P<0.001], blood flow [standardized mean difference ( SMD)=1.96, 95% CI: 1.39-2.54, Z=6.71, P<0.001] and VEGF expression (at mRNA level: SMD=6.01, 95% CI: 0.89-11.13, Z=2.30, P=0.020; at protein level: SMD=3.44, 95% CI: 2.44-4.43, Z=6.73, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the flap survival rate of the pre-operation injection group ( MD=21.54%, 95% CI: 16.07%-27.01%, Z=7.71, P<0.001) was significantly higher than that of the intraoperative injection group ( MD=9.40%, 95% CI: 6.79%-12.00%, Z=7.07, P<0.001). The flap survival rate of the random flap group ( MD=20.87%, 95% CI: 16.67%-25.07%, Z=9.73, P<0.001) was significantly higher than that of the axial flap group ( MD=13.11%, 95% CI: 8.91%-17.31%, Z=6.12, P<0.001). Conclusion:BTXA assisted flap surgery may have positive effects on the survival rate, blood flow and VEGF expression in animal models. In addition, injection timing and flap type may also be important factors in the effect of BTXA on flap surgery.

Objective:To evaluate the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) on flap surgery in animal models.Methods:Nine databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CBM, CNKI, and WANFANG database) were searched for published literature comparing the effects of BTXA (BTXA group) versus saline or no treatment (control group) on flap operation in animal models from January 1979 to March 2022. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Indicators included flap survival rate, blood flow and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression level after surgery. The subjects were divided into pre-operation injection group and intraoperation injection group according to the intervention timing, and were divided into random flap group and axial flap group according to the type of flaps, and subgroup analysis was conducted respectively. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software and Stata 15.1 software were used for all statistical analysis.Results:A total of 603 animals from 19 studies were included after rigorous inclusion and exclusion screening. Compared with control group, BTXA group revealed a significantly higher flap survival rate [mean difference ( MD)=15.65%, 95% CI: 13.11%-18.19%, Z=12.08, P<0.001], blood flow [standardized mean difference ( SMD)=1.96, 95% CI: 1.39-2.54, Z=6.71, P<0.001] and VEGF expression (at mRNA level: SMD=6.01, 95% CI: 0.89-11.13, Z=2.30, P=0.020; at protein level: SMD=3.44, 95% CI: 2.44-4.43, Z=6.73, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the flap survival rate of the pre-operation injection group ( MD=21.54%, 95% CI: 16.07%-27.01%, Z=7.71, P<0.001) was significantly higher than that of the intraoperative injection group ( MD=9.40%, 95% CI: 6.79%-12.00%, Z=7.07, P<0.001). The flap survival rate of the random flap group ( MD=20.87%, 95% CI: 16.67%-25.07%, Z=9.73, P<0.001) was significantly higher than that of the axial flap group ( MD=13.11%, 95% CI: 8.91%-17.31%, Z=6.12, P<0.001). Conclusion:BTXA assisted flap surgery may have positive effects on the survival rate, blood flow and VEGF expression in animal models. In addition, injection timing and flap type may also be important factors in the effect of BTXA on flap surgery.