1.Effect of hemorrhagic transformation on the outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke
Yuhua CHEN ; Lina ZHANG ; Li XU ; Shoukang CHEN ; Liang YIN ; Qiming CHEN
International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases 2010;18(9):650-653
Objective To investigate the effect of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) on the outcome of acute ischemic stroke.Methods One hundred and one patients with acute ischemic stroke were divided into cerebral infarction without HT,hemorrhagic infarction (HI),and parenchymal hematoma (PH) according to the CT and/or MRI findings.The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate the outcome at 3 months after onset,and the good outcome was defined as mRS ≤ 2.The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Results There were 53 patients without HT,44 HI,and 4 PH,respectively in 101 patients with acute ischemic stroke.HI (OR =0.07,95% CI0.01-0.30;P <0.001),<65 years (OR =52.94,95% CI9.12-307.27;P<0.001),and NIHSS score < 15 (OR= 0.63,95% CI 0.50-0.78;P<0.001) were the independent predictors of good outcome for patients with acute ischemic stroke.Conclusions HI is one of the independent predictors of good outcome at 3 months after acute ischemic stroke.
2.Status of diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in 2017: a national multi-center retrospective study.
Jie WU ; Xinjian XU ; Hao XU ; Gang MA ; Chi MA ; Xiaocheng ZHU ; Zeqiang REN ; Xudong WU ; Xudong WU ; Yingjie CHEN ; Yanhong WENG ; Liping HU ; Fei CHEN ; Yonggan JIANG ; Hongbin LIU ; Ming WANG ; Zhenhua YANG ; Xiong YU ; Liang LI ; Xinzeng ZHANG ; Zhigang YAO ; Wei LI ; Jianjun MIAO ; Liguang YANG ; Hui CAO ; Fan CHEN ; Jianjun WU ; Shichen WANG ; Dongzhu ZENG ; Jun ZHANG ; Yongqing HE ; Jianliang CAO ; Wenxing ZHOU ; Zhilong JIANG ; Dongming ZHANG ; Jianwei ZHU ; Wenming YUE ; Yongxi ZHANG ; Junling HOU ; Fei ZHONG ; Junwei WANG ; Chang CAI ; Hongyan LI ; Weishun LIAO ; Haiyang ZHANG ; Getu ZHAORI ; Qinjie LIU ; Zhiwei WANG ; Canwen CHEN ; Jianan REN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2019;22(1):49-58
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the current status of diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis (AA) in China.
METHODS:
Questionnaire survey was used to retrospectively collect data of hospitalized patients with AA from 43 medical centers nationwide in 2017 (Sort by number of cases provided: Jinling Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Lu'an People's Hospital, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Dalian Central Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Dongying People's Hospital, Jinjiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huangshan Shoukang Hospital, Xuyi People's Hospital, Nanjing Jiangbei People's Hospital, Lanzhou 940th Hospital of PLA, Heze Municipal Hospital, The First College of Clinical Medical Science of China Three Gorges University, Affiliated Jiujiang Hospital of Nanchang University, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Affiliated Central Hospital of Shandong Zaozhuang Mining Group, The Third People's Hospital of Kunshan City, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, The 81st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Linyi Central Hospital, The General Hospital of Huainan Eastern Hospital Group, The 908th Hospital of PLA, Liyang People's Hospital, The 901th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, The Fourth Hospital of Jilin University, Harbin Acheng District People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Nanjing Luhe People's Hospital, Taixing Municipal People's Hospital, Baotou Central Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Linyi People's Hospital, The 72st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, People's Hospital of Dayu County, Taixing City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Beijing Guang'anmen Hospital, Langxi County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanyang Central Hospital, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University).The diagnosis and management of AA were analyzed through unified summary. Different centers collected and summarized their data in 2017 and sent back the questionnaires for summary.
RESULTS:
A total of 8 766 AA patients were enrolled from 43 medical centers, including 4 711 males (53.7%) with median age of 39 years and 958 (10.9%) patients over 65 years old. Of 8 776 patients, 5 677 cases (64.6%) received one or more imaging examinations, and the other 3 099 (35.4%) did not receive any imaging examination. A total of 1 858 (21.2%) cases received medical treatment, mainly a combination of nitroimidazoles (1 107 cases, 59.8%) doublet regimen, followed by a single-agent regimen of non-nitroimidazoles (451 cases, 24.4%), a nitroimidazole-free doublet regimen (134 cases, 7.2%), a triple regimen of combined nitroimidazoles (116 cases, 6.3%), nitroimidazole alone (39 cases, 2.1%) and nitroimidazole-free triple regimen (3 cases, 0.2%). Of the 6 908 patients (78.8%) who underwent surgery, 4 319 (62.5%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 2589 (37.5%) underwent open surgery. Ratio of laparotomy was higher in those patients under 16 years old (392 cases) or over 65 years old (258 cases) [15.1%(392/2 589) and 10.0%(258/2 589), respectively, compared with 8.5%(367/4 316) and 8.0%(347/4 316) in the same age group for laparoscopic surgery, χ²=91.415, P<0.001; χ²=15.915,P<0.001]. Patients with complicated appendicitis had higher ratio of undergoing open surgery as compared to those undergoing laparoscopic surgery [26.7%(692/2 589) vs. 15.6%(672/4 316), χ²=125.726, P<0.001].The cure rates of laparoscopic and open surgery were 100.0% and 99.8%(2 585/2 589) respectively without significant difference (P=0.206). Postoperative complication rates were 4.5%(121/2 589) and 4.7%(196/4 316) respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (χ²=0.065, P=0.799). The incidence of surgical site infection was lower (0.6% vs. 1.7%, χ²=17.315, P<0.001), and hospital stay was shorter [6(4-7) days vs. 6(5-8) days, U=4 384 348.0, P<0.001] in the laparoscopic surgery group, while hospitalization cost was higher (median 12 527 yuan vs. 9 342 yuan, U=2 586 809.0, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still clinically based, supplemented by imaging examination. Appendectomy is still the most effective treatment at present. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the main treatment strategy, but anti-infective drugs are also very effective.
Acute Disease
;
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
therapeutic use
;
Appendectomy
;
Appendicitis
;
diagnosis
;
therapy
;
China
;
Female
;
Health Care Surveys
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult