We examined the effect of increased rehabilitative training time on patients with cerebrovascular disorders at a convalescent rehabilitation ward in Japan. After April 2006, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Labor raised the permitted training time from 6 to 9 units (1 unit of training time corresponds to 20 minutes of exercise with a therapist) for patients in a convalescent rehabilitation ward. We compared patients who underwent rehabilitation during the period from April 2006 to March 2008 (9-unit group, 131 patients) with those rehabilitated from April 2003 to March 2006 6-unit group, 153 patients) in the convalescent rehabilitation ward of our hospital. The patients were evaluated with FIM instruments at admission and discharge. Length of hospital stay and rate of return to the patient's home were also examined. The 9-unit group had a shorter hospital stay, and higher FIM efficiency scores, and also a higher rate of home return compared with the 6-unit group.

After April 2006, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Labor raised the permitted training time from 6 to 9 units (1 unit of training time corresponds to 20 minutes of exercise with a therapist) for patients in a kaifukuki (convalescent) rehabilitation ward. We examined the effect of the increased rehabilitative training time on patients using feeding tubes in a kaifukuki rehabilitation ward after an initial cerebrovascular disorder, with a particular focus on improving swallowing disorders. Our study was comprised of post-stroke patients with feeding tubes who underwent rehabilitation from April 2001 to March 2006 (N=14, 6-unit group) and from April 2006 to March 2009 (N=16, 9-unit group). All patients went to the ward within two months after suffering a stroke. There was no significant difference in the Functional Independence Measure(FIM) efficiency or length of hospital stay between the two groups. Feeding tube removal was more common in the 9-unit group compared to the 6-unit group (81.3% vs. 35.7%, p<0.05), and the 9-unit group also had more training time per day. Logistic regression analysis showed that the increased training time per day spent with a speech therapist contributed to improving swallowing disorders (p<0.01).

Purpose: We report two patients receiving high doses of systemic opioids in whom gradual switching of the opioid administration route from systemic to intrathecal provided satisfactory pain relief without excessive sedation or withdrawal symptoms. Case reports: In one of the patients, who was already receiving 500mg morphine intravenously but still suffered from right upper quadrant pain, it was difficult to increase the opioid dosage according to the WHO guidelines because of intolerable side effects. The other patient, in spite of taking a combination of systemic opioids equivalent to 760mg oral morphine, had inadequate pain relief and could not continue receiving home medical care. In both cases we could successfully change from systemic to intrathecal opioid administration in a step-wise manner without deterioration of pain control, adverse effects due to over dosage, or withdrawal symptoms. Intrathecal opioid administration also reduced drowsiness and improved daily activity. Conclusion: Currently, there are no guidelines for change of route of opioid administration from systemic to intrathecal administration and few published reports have concretely documented opioid route switching in Japan. A carefully planned, step-wise switching of opioid administration route from systemic to intrathecal should be considered in patients who are already taking high doses of systemic opioids. Palliat Care Res 2009; 4(1): 317-320