1.Retrospective Study of Surgical Gastrojejunostomy versus Gastroduodenal Stenting for Malignant Gastroduodenal Obstruction
Toshihiko Matsumoto ; Kaori Hino ; Hiroyuki Terasawa ; Akio Nakasya ; Kazuhiro Uesugi ; Norifumi Nishide ; Takeshi Kajiwara ; Akinori Asagi ; Tomohiro Nishina ; Junichirou Nasu ; Shinichiro Hori ; Seijin Nadano ; Hiroshi Ishii
Palliative Care Research 2016;11(2):166-173
Background: We retrospectively compared endscopic gastroduodenal stenting with gastrojejunostomy as a means of palliating malignant gastric and duodenal obstruction. Methods: This retrospective study investigated patients treated for malignant gastric and duodenal obstruction from April 2011 to April 2015 at Shikoku Cancer Center. Results: Of the 40 patients in this study, 25 underwent gastroduodenal stenting and 15 had operative gastrojejunostomy. Comparing the stenting and operative patients, technical success rate was 100% in both group, clinical success rate was 84% in stenting patients and 93% in operative patients. The median time to fluid intake was significantly shorter in stenting patients than operative patients(0 day vs 2 days, p=0.0003), and the median time to intake of solids was also significantly shorter in stenting patients(1day vs 3 days, p<0.0001).The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in stenting patients(9 days vs 23 days, p=0.0116). Median cost of hospitalization is more expensive in operative patients than stenting patients(¥1,106,170 vs ¥752,290, p=0.0052). Conclusion: Our study suggested that gastoroduodenal stent was less length of time to fluid/solid intake, and less costly than gastrojejunostomy.
2.Ibaraki's Amabie-chan usage and its association with infection prevention behavior and fear of COVID-19: a cross-sectional preliminary survey of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study.
Daisuke HORI ; Yuichi OI ; Shotaro DOKI ; Tsukasa TAKAHASHI ; Tomohiko IKEDA ; Yu IKEDA ; Yo ARAI ; Kei MUROI ; Hiroaki SASAKI ; Mami ISHITSUKA ; Asako MATSUURA ; Wyi GO ; Ichiyo MATSUZAKI ; Shinichiro SASAHARA
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2022;27(0):17-17
BACKGROUND:
Ibaraki's Amabie-chan is a COVID-19 infection control system unique to Ibaraki prefecture, Japan. It requires residents to register each time they visit events, commercial facilities, and restaurants. The number of registrations has been limited, and its function alerting about people positive for COVID-19 infection seems not to be working. Nevertheless, registration with the system might have some impact on the user's behavior. In the current preliminary survey, the possible impact of Ibaraki's Amabie-chan on infection prevention behavior and fear of COVID-19 was investigated.
METHODS:
A cross-sectional, web-based, anonymous, and self-administered survey was conducted at two workplaces in Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki, Japan. The first survey was conducted at one of the workplaces in November 2020, and the second survey, at the other workplace in February 2021. Variables of interest were sex, age group, marital status, employment status, Ibaraki's Amabie-chan use, COVID-19 Contact-Confirming Application use, ten items of infection prevention behaviors, and fear of COVID-19. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS:
In both surveys, use of Ibaraki's Amabie-chan was significantly associated with COCOA use and with "physical condition management such as body temperature measurement." No association was found with other infection prevention behaviors or with fear of COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings did not provide sufficient evidence for the effectiveness of Ibaraki's Amabie-chan in regard to users' infection control behavior. Further detailed study is needed to investigate the effectiveness in terms of infection prevention and the cost-effectiveness of Ibaraki's Amabie-chan.
COVID-19/prevention & control*
;
Cohort Studies
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Fear
;
Humans
;
SARS-CoV-2
3.Association between flourishing mental health and occupational stress among workers of Tsukuba Science City, Japan: a cross-sectional study.
Daisuke HORI ; Yuichi OI ; Yuh OHTAKI ; Christina-Sylvia ANDREA ; Tsukasa TAKAHASHI ; Nagisa SHIRAKI ; Tomohiko IKEDA ; Yu IKEDA ; Shotaro DOKI ; Shinichiro SASAHARA ; Ichiyo MATSUZAKI
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2019;24(1):64-64
BACKGROUND:
Flourishing, defined as the coexistence of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, is the most favorable end of the mental health spectrum. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated the association between flourishing mental health and favorable work-related outcomes. However, epidemiology of flourishing mental health is scarce in Japan. Moreover, the relationship between flourishing mental health and occupational stress has not been elaborated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate (1) the prevalence of flourishing mental health and (2) the association between flourishing mental health and occupational stress among Japanese workers.
METHODS:
The present survey was conducted in from February to March 2017 via an anonymous, self-administered, and web-based questionnaire among workers in Tsukuba Science City, Japan. Mental Health Continuum Short Form was used to assess flourishing mental health. We performed binomial logistic regression analyses to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of occupational stress for flourishing mental health, controlling for sociodemographic factors.
RESULTS:
A total of 7012 respondents (4402 men, 2610 women) were analyzed. The overall prevalence of flourishing mental health among the respondents was 12.4%. Full-time (permanent) workers were less likely to be flourishing. Reward from work (AOR = 2.34, 95% CI = 2.04-2.68), support from colleagues and superiors (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.44-1.94), and workload (AOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05-1.36) were positively associated with flourishing mental health, whereas mental workload (AOR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57-0.75) was inversely associated with flourishing mental health.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of the present study shed light on the association between flourishing mental health and occupational stress.