Objective To investigate the distribution and drug resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from peritonsillar abscess .Methods Data on bacterial pathogens isolated from peritonsillar abscess in Wenzhou Central Hospital from January 2010 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed .Strains were identified with Vitek 32 identification system and the drug susceptibility test was performed with K-B method.Chi-square test for linear trend was performed to reveal the changes of distribution and drug resistance of the strains .Results A total of 2 864 bacterial strains were isolated in five years , in which 1 786 strains were Gram-negative bacilli (62.4%), and 1 078 (37.6%) strains were Gram-positive cocci. The positive rate of Gram-negative bacilli was on the rise during year 2010-2014 (χ2 =84.74, P<0.01), and the top three Gram-negative bacilli were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Haemophilus influenzae, which accounted for 72.5%(1 295/1 786) of the total Gram-negative strains, and the positive rates of first two bacilli were on the rise (χ2 =83.75 and 24.74, P<0.01).Gram-positive cocci were mainly Staphylococcus aureus and Hemolytic streptococcus, which accounted for 83.2% ( 897/1 078) of the total Gram-positive strains.Resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime, cefoperazone, piperacillin/tazobactam were on the rise (χ2 =16.17, 13.48 and 11.44, P<0.05), while resistance rates to gentamicin and amikacin were on the decline (χ2 =16.54 and 16.63, P <0.05). Resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to ceftazidime, cefoperazone/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam were on the rise (χ2 =12.52, 10.85 and 14.14, P<0.05).Resistance rates of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin were on the rise (χ2 =10.21, P<0.05), and the positive rate of β-lactamase producing strains was also on the rise (χ2 =10.38, P<0.05).Resistance rates of Staphylococcus aureus to cefazolin and methicillin were on the rise (χ2 =15.44 and 12.53, P<0.05), but no vancomycin resistant strain was found .Hemolytic streptococcus were sensitive to all commonly used antibiotics .Conclusions Peritonsillar abscess in Wenzhou Central Hospital is mainly induced by Gram-negative bacilli infection . Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus are the top three bacterial pathogens , and are highly resistant to most antibiotics .

Objective To observe the serum concentration of S100βprotein (S100β)and neuron specific enolase (NSE)in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor resection with ulinastatin treat-ment.Methods Twenty-four patients with supratentorial tumor resection,aged 18-65 years,ASA Ⅰor Ⅱ,were randomly divided into the control group (group A,n =12)and ulinastatin group (group U,n =12).Patients in group U received ulinastatin (2 kU/kg)at the beginning of the surgery,with the continuous dose of 1 kU·kg-1 ·h-1 till the end of the operation.Group A received equivalent volume of saline solution as the vehicle control.Blood samples were taken from the artery and jugular venous bulb before induction of anesthesia (T1 ),skin incision (T2 ),1 h after dura openning (T3 ),at the closure of dura (T4 ),at the end of operation (T5 )and 24 h after operation (T6 )to analyze the concentration of S100β and NSE.The concentration of S100β and NSE were determined by ELISA. Results The concentration of serum S100β and NSE increased more significantly higher at T3-T6 in group A than group U (P <0.01).The concentration of serum S100βand NSE in group U were lower than those in group A at T3-T5 (P < 0.01 ).Conclusion Ulinastatin reduces the concentration of serum S100βand NSE during surgery,indicating it alleviates brain injury during supratentorial tumor resection.

Objective To investigate the short-term clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in the treatment of locally recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods Clinical data of 120 cases of recurrent NSCLC after radiotherapy admitted to our hospital from October 2009 to October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.SRT was adopted for further radiotherapy.The prescription dose was 50％ dose curve surrounding the target area.The total dose was 40-50 Gy,with a single dose of 4-5 Gy for 8-12 times.The chest CT was re-examined every 2 months after radiotherapy.The short-term clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated.The changes of Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and quality of life (QOL) were recorded before and after radiotherapy.Results One patient terminated the radiotherapy due to grade 3 acute radiation-induced pneumonia,25 patients (21.0％) obtained complete remission (CR),61 cases (51.3％) of partial remission (PR),19 cases (16.0％) of stable disease (SD),14 cases (11.8％) of progress disease (PD),86 cases (72.3％) of objective remission rate (CR+PR),and 105 cases (88.2％) of disease control (CR+PR+SD),respectively.Thirty-one patients experienced radiation-induced pneumonia,23 cases of radiation-induced myelosuppression and 1 case of acute radiation-induced heart injury.All these adverse reactions were mitigated after symptomatic treatment.The KPS was significantly increased from 68.16±15.22 before SRT to 78.39± 11.50 after SRT (P＜0.05).The QOL was considerably elevated from 27.58±5.37 prior to SRT to 38.16±8.39 following SRT (P＜0.01).Conclusion SRT is an efficacious and safe treatment of locally recurrent NSCLC,which yields controllable and tolerable adverse reactions and enhances the QOL of patients.

Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of different doses of apatinib combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the adverse reactions.Methods:A total of 69 patients with NSCLC diagnosed in the No. 901 Hospital of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army Joint Logistics Support Force were selected from January 2018 to June 2020, and were divided into chemotherapy alone group (docetaxel+ cisplatin was used), apatinib group A [apatinib (0.25 g)+ docetaxel+ cisplatin was used] and apatinib group B [apatinib (0.50 g)+ docetaxel+ cisplatin was used] according to random number table method, with 23 cases in each group. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), and incidences of adverse reactions were compared between the three groups of patients.Results:One patients in the apatinib group B withdrew from the study due to acute myocardial infarction. After 4 cycless of treatment, the ORR of the patients in the chemotherapy alone group, apatinib group A and apatinib group B were 17.39% (4/23), 47.83% (11/23) and 54.55% (12/22) respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=7.41, P=0.024). The ORR of the apatinib group B was higher than that of the chemotherapy alone group, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=6.77, P=0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in ORR between the apatinib group A and chemotherapy alone group, the apatinib group A and apatinib group B ( χ2=4.85, P=0.028; χ2=0.20, P=0.652). The DCR of the patients in the three groups were 47.83% (11/23), 78.26% (18/23) and 86.36% (19/22) respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=9.03, P=0.011). The DCR of the apatinib group B was higher than that of the chemotherapy alone group, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=7.52, P=0.006). There were no statistically significant differences in DCR between the apatinib group A and the chemotherapy alone group, the apatinib group A and apatinib group B ( χ2=4.57, P=0.033; χ2=0.51, P=0.477). The median OS of the patients in the three groups were 6.8, 9.2 and 9.9 months respectively, with a statistically significant different ( χ2=8.91, P=0.022). Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the median OS of the apatinib group A and apatinib group B were significantly prolonged, with statistically significant differences ( χ2=7.25, P=0.036; χ2=8.60, P=0.029). Compared with the apatinib group A, the median OS of the apatinib group B was prolonged, but there was no statistically significant different ( χ2=1.54, P=0.201). The median PFS of the patients in the three groups were 5.2, 7.7 and 8.2 months respectively, with a statistically significant different ( χ2=8.79, P=0.026). Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the median PFS of the apatinib group A and apatinib group B were significantly prolonged, with statistically significant differences ( χ2=7.01, P=0.039; χ2=8.36, P=0.031). Compared with the apatinib A group, the median PFS of the apatinib group B was prolonged, but there was no statistically significant different ( χ2=1.68, P=0.186). There were statistically significant differences in the incidences of fatigue [34.78% (8/23) vs. 65.22% (15/23) vs. 72.73% (16/22), χ2=7.50, P=0.024], hypertension [4.35% (1/23) vs. 34.78% (8/23) vs. 68.18% (15/22), χ2=20.07, P<0.001], hand-foot syndrome [4.35% (1/23) vs. 43.48% (10/23) vs. 72.73% (16/22), χ2=22.28, P<0.001] and oral mucositis [8.70% (2/23) vs. 39.13% (9/23) vs. 72.73% (16/22), χ2=19.26, P<0.001] among the three groups. Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the incidences of hypertension and hand-foot syndrome in the apatinib group A and the incidences of fatigue, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome and oral mucositis in the apatinib group B were increased, with statistically significant differences ( χ2=6.77, P=0.009; χ2=9.68, P=0.002; χ2=6.51, P=0.011; χ2=20.00, P<0.001; χ2=22.37, P<0.001; χ2=19.21, P<0.001). Conclusion:Apatinib (0.50 g) combined with chemotherapy has better short-term efficacy than chemotherapy alone in advanced NSCLC. Apatinib (0.25 g) and apatinib (0.50 g) can prolong the survival of patients, but increasing the treatment dose can not achieve longer survival benefit.

[摘 要] 目的：探讨贝伐珠单抗联合多柔比星脂质体治疗铂类耐药复发性卵巢上皮性癌患者的近期疗效和不良反应，并随访生存情况。方法：选取中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇一医院2018年1月至2019年12月收治的76例铂类耐药复发性卵巢上皮性癌患者，采用数字随机分组法分为对照组38例、观察组38例，对照组给予多柔比星脂质体单药化疗4个周期，观察组给予贝伐珠单抗联合多柔比星脂质体化疗4个周期，观察两组患者治疗后近期疗效和不良反应，以及血清肿瘤标志物人附睾蛋白4（human epididymis protein 4，HE4）、糖类抗原125（carbohydrate antigen 125，CA125）变化，并随访总生存期（OS）和无疾病进展生存期（PFS）。结果：对照组患者客观有效率（ORR）为40.54%、疾病控制率（DCR）为67.57%，观察组患者ORR为69.44%、DCR为88.89%，观察组ORR和DCR显著高于对照组（均P<0.05）。治疗后观察组患者血清HE4和CA125分别为（142.67±46.81）pmol/L、（31.79±11.65）U/L，显著低于对照组患者的（219.33±75.67）pmol/L、（57.05±17.85）U/L（均P<0.05）。两组患者的胃肠反应、骨髓抑制、肝肾功能损伤、心脏毒性、过敏反应、血栓栓塞和出血等不良反应相比较差异无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；观察组患者高血压发生率显著高于对照组（P<0.05），但可控、可耐受。观察组患者中位OS 和中位PFS分别分别为17.2个月和10.9个月，显著长于对照组患者的14.1个月和7.8个月（均P<0.05）。结论：对于铂类耐药复发性卵巢上皮性癌患者，贝伐珠单抗联合多柔比星脂质体近期疗效可靠、安全性好、不良反应可耐受，值得临床推广。

[Abstract] Objective: To observe the short-term efficacy and safety of Apatinib combined with radiotherapy and concurrent docetaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy in driver-gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. Methods: A total of 72 NSCLC patients with brain metastases, who were treated in our hospital from June 2018 to June 2019, were enrolled in this study. The driver gene was proved to be negative by next generation sequencing (NGS). The patients were divided into control group (36 cases) and treatment group (36 cases) by Digital random grouping method.The control group received 2 cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for brain metastases, and the treatment group was given Apatinib anti-angiogenic treatment based on the regimen in control group. Primary study endpoints: confirmed objective response rate (cORR) and disease control rate (DCR); Secondary study endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QOL) score, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and incidence of adverse drug events (AE). Results: Compared with the control group, cORR and DCR in treatment group were significantly improved [41.67% (15/36) vs 33.33% (12/36), 80.56% (29/36) vs 69.44% (25/36), all P<0.05], the median PFS was significantly prolonged (5.9 vs 4.6 months, P<0.05), and serum CEA and VEGF levels were significantly reduced [(16.5±2.3) vs (22.9±3.7) ng/ml, (291.6±42.6) vs (479.3±50.2) ng/L, all P<0.05], while the QOL score was slightly increased, but the difference was not statistically significant [(69.5±8.5) points vs (64.1±7.3) points, P>0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of acute brain edema, gastrointestinal reaction, bone marrow suppression, and liver dysfunction between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05); however, the incidences of oral mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension and proteinuria in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion: The efficacy of Apatinib combined with radiochemotherapy in driver-negative NSCLC patients with brain metastases is significantly better than that of radiochemotherapy alone, and the adverse reactions can be controlled. It is worthy of clinical recommendation.

Objective: : To observe the short-term efficacy and toxicity of apatinib monotherapy as well as docetaxel plus cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer. Method: : According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 108 patients with advanced gastric cancer in the 105th Hospital of PLA were selected. According to random table grouping method, there were 54 cases in group A and 54 cases in group B. Patients in group A received continuous oral administration of apatinib alone, while group B received docetaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy, with 3 weeks as a cycle and 4 cycles for a course. The efficacy and side effects were evaluated 3 months later. Results: : In groupA, there were 4 cases of CR, 25 cases of PR, 18 cases of SD and 7 cases of PD; the ORR was 53.7% and DCR was 87%. In group B, there were 2 cases of CR, 19 cases of PR, 21 cases of SD and 12 cases of PD; the ORR was 38.9% and DCR was 77.8%. The ORR and DCR in group A were significantly better than those in group B (P<0.05). The main adverse reactions were gastrointestinal reaction, myelosuppression, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, all of which were grade 1 to 2; The incidence of bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reaction in group A was lower than that in group B (P<0.05), while the incidence of hand-foot syndrome and hypertension in group B was lower than that in group A (P<0.01). Conclusion： ：The short-term efficacy of targeted therapy of apatinib alone was better than that of docetaxel combined with cisplatin chemotherapy, and the toxicity and side effects of both regimens were controllable;Apatinib can be used as the primary regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.