1.Study of a suitable turn over nursing program for preventing pressure sores in stroke patients
Ping ZHOU ; Huahua LIU ; Shengyan HUANG ; Meiling XIE
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2011;27(11):23-25
Objective To observe the preventing effect of optimal programs (improving turn over postures and elongating the turn over intervals)in preventing pressure sore occurrence in patients with acute stroke. Methods Acute stage stroke patients (time from on-set less than or equal to one week)were selected and divided randomly into 4 groups, one group adopted 2.0 hours turn over intervals as the routine group, others adopted 2.5 hours, 3.0 hours, 3.5 hours turn over intervals as the study groups. The incidence of pressure sores and complications were recorded. Results None of the groups (2.0 h, 2.5 h,3.0 h, 3.5 h)suffered from pressure sores. The incidence of complications including malnutrition, pulmonary infections and constipations was not increased in the study groups either. Conclusions Optimal turn over nursing programs including elongating turn over intervals to 2.5h, 3.0h, 3.5h and adopting 30 degree lateral posture can effectively prevent occurrence of pressure sores in acute stroke patients.
2. Integrated model of specialist-general practitioner and community nurse for diabetes management in Xinjiang primary care settings
Bin HUANG ; Xudong JI ; Shengyan WANG ; Jianxin YIN ; Naihong YANG ; Junxia ZHAI ; Wenhuan KANG ; Xuhong MA ; Jin LI
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners 2020;19(1):83-85
A total of 115 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited from Quanzijie Township Health Service Center were divided into integrated management group (
3. Effect of diabetic management modes on diabetic nephropathy: a prospective study
Jin LI ; Bin HUANG ; Shengyan WANG ; Xudong JI ; Jianxin YIN ; Naihong YANG ; Junxia ZHAI ; Wenhuan KANG ; Xuhong MA
Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2019;31(12):1497-1500
Objective:
To explore the effect of "diabetes specialists-community general practitioners-community nurse co-management mode" and "diabetes specialist management mode" on diabetic nephropathy (DN) in primary medical institutions.
Methods:
Patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to Quanzijie Health Clinic of Jimusar County of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from October 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled. The Patients were divided into co-management group or specialist management group according to their administrative villages. The treatment plans of the two groups were formulated with reference to the current guidelines. The subjects of the co-management group were jointly managed by a fixed team composed of diabetes specialists from Jimusar Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, community general practitioners and community nurses from Quanzijie Health Clinic, and required to attend diabetes education courses every month. The diabetes specialist of Jimusar Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital was responsible for the formulation and management of the treatment plan of the research object. Follow-up was fulfilled once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks in two groups. Before and after intervention, blood glucose, blood pressure, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as well as the utilization rate of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) were collected.
Results:
A total of 115 patients accomplished this study with 54 patients in co-management group and 61 patients in specialist management group. After 24 weeks of intervention, fasting glucose level, postprandial glucose level 2 hours after breakfast, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), Log UACR in co-management group and specialists management group were significantly decreased compared with baseline [fasting glucose level (mmol/L): 8.06±1.92 vs. 9.16±2.83, 8.21±2.10 vs. 9.06±1.89; postprandial glucose level 2 hours after breakfast (mmol/L): 12.26±3.78 vs. 14.11±5.28, 12.47±3.63 vs. 14.00±3.88; HbA1c: 0.074±0.014 vs. 0.082±0.023, 0.076±0.014 vs. 0.081±0.016; Log UACR (mg/g): 1.63±1.56 vs. 2.25±1.44, 1.84±1.65 vs. 2.43±1.56, all