1.A Course of Post-primary Clinical Training at Anjo Kosei Hospital
Masahiro YAMAMOTO ; Kazuhiro SUZUKI ; Seiji SHIMIZU
Medical Education 2005;36(5):287-289
1) Anjo Kosei Hospital has nearly 40 years of history of the post-primary clinical training course.
2) More than 90% of the young doctors, passed through 2 years of the primary clinical training course, have chosen further training at Anjo Kosei Hospital. During this course they began to start the experience for their own career for specialist.
3) This education program is closely coordinated with Medical Colleges such as Nagoya University and Nagoya City College of medicine. After 4 or 5 years of training at Anjo Kosei Hospital, they continued their training at Nagoya University Hospital or Nagoya City College Hospital for the further career.
2.Referral and Consultation Practice between Generalists and Specialists at a University Hospital: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Keiichiro KITA ; Yosuke SHIMIZU ; Seiji YAMASHIRO
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association 2019;42(2):92-97
Background: Few studies have focused on the current state of referral and consultation practice between generalists and specialists at Japanese university hospitals.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of 513 outpatients (a cumulative total of 608 patients) who visited the Department of General Medicine of Toyama University Hospital between January and December 2016. All patients used our in-hospital consultation and referral service.Results: We referred 492 new patients to different specialists, with 40% referred to psychiatry, orthopedics, otolaryngology, and dermatology specialists. Our suspected diagnoses were correct for 285 of 395 patients (72%) who were referred to specialists to confirm the diagnosis. No abnormalities were observed in 86 patients (21%), and inappropriate referrals were made for 5 patients (1.2%). We also received 116 consultations from specialists, 66% of which were from orthopedics, psychiatry, gynecology, oral dental surgery, and neurosurgery specialists. Many of the referred patients had vague symptoms such as fever and general fatigue.Conclusion: Improving the practical skills of generalists regarding orthopedic and otolaryngologic problems may result in more appropriate referrals. Our department also served as a consultant for medical problems for specialists, especially orthopedic surgeons and psychiatrists.
3.Evaluations of a Program for Teaching Basic Clinical Skills to Medical Students.
Seiji SAITO ; Yukihiro SHIMIZU ; Keiichiro KITA ; Kouji OHZAWA ; Akiharu WATANABE
Medical Education 2001;32(6):451-457
A program for teaching basic clinical skills to fifth-year medical students was started at Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University in 1999. The five units of basic clinical skills included: 1) medical interviewing, 2) general physical examination, 3) chest examination, 4) abdominal examination, and 5) neurologic examination. The educational strategies and evaluations in each unit consisted of: 1) lectures, 2) videotape demonstrations, 3) role-playing in small groups, 4) practice on patients in small groups, 5) written examinations, and 6) objective structured clinical examinations. The students evaluated each session of the program with a five-grade rating scale and comments. Small-group sessions (role play and practice on patients) and objective structured clinical examinations received the highest scores, followed by videotape demonstrations. Lectures received significantly lower scores than did other parts of the program. In addition, most students recommended standardization of educational content, increased practice time, and fewer lectures. We conclude that evaluation by students is essential for improving programs for teaching basic clinical skills.
4.Report on the Toronto International Program to Strengthen Family Medicine and Primary Care
Kaku KURODA ; Moe KURODA ; Yosuke SHIMIZU ; Daishi OGAWA ; Makoto OURA ; Naoko KOBAYASHI ; Seiji YAMASHIRO
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association 2020;43(1):29-31
We participated in TIPS-FM (Toronto International Program to Strengthen Family Medicine and Primary Care) for two weeks in Toronto in June 2019. This program enabled us to learn many important factors for developing family medicine. Based on Canadian family medicine, which has a long history, we were able to review the missions of family medicine in Japan, and gained further insight into multilayered essentials on the patient-, community-, and global-levels.
5.Limited Clinical Significance of Splenectomy and Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection for Type 4 Gastric Cancer
Aina KUNITOMO ; Kazunari MISAWA ; Yuichi ITO ; Seiji ITO ; Eiji HIGAKI ; Seiji NATSUME ; Takashi KINOSHITA ; Tetsuya ABE ; Koji KOMORI ; Yasuhiro SHIMIZU
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2021;21(4):392-402
Purpose:
Type 4 gastric cancer (GC) has a very poor prognosis even after curative resection, and the survival benefit of splenectomy for splenic hilar lymph node (LN; #10) dissection in type 4 GC remains equivocal. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of splenectomy for #10 dissection in patients with type 4 GC.
Materials and Methods:
The data of a total of 56 patients with type 4 GC who underwent total gastrectomy with splenectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative morbidity, state of LN metastasis, survival outcomes, and therapeutic value index (TVI) of each LN station were evaluated. TVI was calculated by multiplying the incidence of LN metastasis at each nodal station and the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients who had metastasis to each node.
Results:
Overall, the postoperative morbidity rate was 28.6%, and the incidence of #10 metastasis in the patients was 28.6%. The 5-year OS rate for all patients was 29.9%, and most patients developed peritoneal recurrence. Moreover, the 5-year OS rates with and without #10 metastasis were 6.7% and 39.1% (median survival time, 20.4 vs. 46.0 months; P=0.006). The TVI of #10 was as low as 1.92.
Conclusions
The clinical significance of splenectomy in the dissection of #10 for type 4 GC is limited and splenectomy for splenic hilar dissection alone should be omitted.