1.Pulmonary stenosis after arterial switch operation for complete transposition of the great arteries(TGA).
Tadashi IKEDA ; Yoshio YOKOTA ; Fumio OKAMOTO ; Akira SHIMIZU ; Shogo NAKAYAMA ; Shuichi MATSUNO ; Shigehiro OHTANI ; Katsushi ODA ; Seiichiro MAKINO
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1989;19(1):7-12
Pulmonary stenosis is the most frequent problem after arterial switch operation for TGA. We experienced four cases of late severe pulmonary stenosis out of twelve patients. All four had supravalvular stenosis either at anastomotic site or at previously banded segment. One patient had associated valvular stenosis and another had bilateral branch stenosis. It is possible that valvular stenosis was due to retraction of equine pericardial patch and branch stenosis was due to overdistension. All four cases were successfully reoperated on 13∼39 months after switch operation. To prevent late pulmonary stenosis, we now alter technique of switch operation in two points. First, the great arteries are anastomosed with interrupted U-shaped sutures from outside of the vessels in whole circumference. Second, both coronary arteries are transferred with punched-out method to save tissue of Valsalva sinus, and the defects are closed with autologous pericardial patch.
2.Gingyo Gedokusan vs Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Influenza and Influenza-like illness : An Open-label Prospective Study
Kentaro Iwata ; Wataru Igarashi ; Midori Honjo ; Takashi Nishimoto ; Kyoko Shinya ; Akiko Makino ; Kazuo Mitani ; Yoshiko Tatsumi ; Hiroyuki Ninomiya ; Kumi Higasa ; Seiichiro Usuki ; Hiroki Kagawa ; Daisuke Uchida ; Kohei Takimoto ; Rei Suganaga ; Hiroo Matsuo ; Yuichiro Oba ; Mami Horigome ; Hideaki Oka ; Goh Ohji ; Yasuhisa Abe ; Hiroyuki Yoshida ; Shohiro Kinoshita ; Midori Hirai
General Medicine 2013;14(1):13-22
Background: Gingyo-gedoku-san (GGGS) is an herbal medicine approved for upper respiratory infections in Japan. We conducted an open-label, multi-center, prospective trial, comparing GGGS with oseltamivir in patients with influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) as a pilot study.
Methods: Subjects were healthy persons aged between 16 and 40, and were enrolled from January 12, 2010 to March 24, 2011. Fifteen patients were enrolled in this trial (8 and 7 for GGGS and oseltamivir, respectively). RT-PCR was positive for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in 10 patients. The patients were provided with either GGGS or oseltamivir for 5 days. The primary outcome was mortality and/or hospitalization 7 days after the initial diagnosis. Body temperature and other clinical characteristics were also evaluated.
Results: All patients recovered from illness without complication or hospitalization. The mean time to resolve symptoms for the GGGS and oseltamivir groups was 3.9 days and 3.3 days, respectively (p=0.43). The GGGS group appeared to have a smaller symptom score AUC than the oseltamivir group, (p=0.26). Time to recover activity level appeared to be shorter in the GGGS group (p=0.10), with shorter time to recover health status (p=0.02). Sub-group analysis on patients with positive PCR showed similar results between the two groups.
Conclusion: GGGS was associated with symptom improvements resembling oseltamivir for both influenza and ILI. Randomized controlled trials involving larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.