1.Complementary Medicine & Mucosal Immunology-Recent Topics around Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Toshinori ITO ; Yasuyuki KAI ; Takumi IGURA ; Seiichi NAKAJIMA ; Toshiro NISHIDA ; Tsunekazu MIZUSHIMA ; Riichiro NEZU
Japanese Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2008;5(2):85-101
Complementary medicine aimed at improving patients’ QOL by complementing modern medicine has recently become the focus of attention. These alternative supplements or functional foods are commonly biologically based. Contained within food itself, these specialized components serve a tertiary function regarding biological regulation and defense. Further, in vivo mechanisms are considered to be closely linked to mucosal immunity of the intestine. As the mechanism of innate immunity is further elucidated, the significant role of certain food components in relation to mucosal immunity of the intestine has become a focus of interest.
In this paper, I would like to describe the experimental and clinical applications of complementary medicine in cases of chronic and/or intractable inflammatory bowel disease.
2.Current Status and Influencing Factors of the Stockpiling of Regular Medicines for Disasters in Patients with Chronic Disease
Akira MITOYA ; Ryota KUMAKI ; Ryoo TANIGUCHI ; Mitsuhiro SOMEYA ; Ryuichi KINOSHITA ; Tomoyuki SUZUKI ; Seiichi FURUTA ; Keiko AKAGAWA ; Keiko KISHIMOTO
Japanese Journal of Social Pharmacy 2024;43(1):2-11
To promote the stockpiling of regular medicines for disasters (SMD), we investigated SMD rates and clarified the relationship between SMD status (Yes or No) and the characteristics of patients with chronic diseases. A survey was provided to patients visiting the pharmacies in Hokkaido. SMD was defined as a patient having a supply of regular medicine for 7 days or more and replacing with new medicine within one year. Of a total of 537 participants (51.0% male; mean age 65.8 years), 61.1% had experienced a major disaster. The SMD rate was extremely low at 15.3%. The median score for a patient’s understanding of the regular medicine names (5-point scale: 1=hardly understood, 5=almost understood) was 2. The median number of monthly pharmacy visits was 0.8. 5.4% were recommended SMD by physicians or pharmacists. Results from multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that positive patient characteristics included age (OR=1.154, 95%CI [1.026-1.298], P=0.017), understanding of the regular medicine names (1.724, [1.039-2.859], P=0.035), and recommendation of SMD by physicians or pharmacists (5.991, [2.616-13.722], P<0.001). A negative patient characteristic was the number of pharmacy visits (0.587, [0.383-0.899], P=0.014). The most influential positive factor was the recommendation of SMD by physicians or pharmacists; however, only 5.4% of the participants had experienced this. The findings of this study indicated important that health care providers and the government to work together to devise easy-to-understand measures to inform local residents about the importance of SMD and how to them, conduct educational activities.