1.Management of primary T1G3 bladder cancer: immediate cystectomy or bladder preserving approach?
Xiaowen SUN ; Mingshan YANG ; Dongbin BI ; Weiguo LI ; Haitao LIU ; Bangmin HAN ; Sanwei GUO ; Shujie XIA
Chinese Journal of Urology 2008;29(12):811-814
Objective To compare the long-term outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed stage T1G3 bladder cancer treated with bladder preserving approach and intravesical instillation or im-mediate cystectomy.Methods of 113 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 27 to 88) diag-nosed with T1G3 bladder cancer from January 1993 to February 2007,81 cases were treated by tran-sureteral resection with additional intravesieal instillation and 32 were treated with immediate cystecto-my.Differences between the 2 groups in 5-year overall survival and tumor specific survival were calcu-lated using the Kaplan-Meier survival function and analyzed by the log rank test.Results of 81 pa-tients treated with organ preserving approach and postoperative intravesical instillation,53 patients developed local recurrence and 21 patients underwent deferred cysteetomy in a median 64 (range 6-140) months follow-up.The overall and tumor specific survival at 5 years was 64.2% (52/81) and 77.8%(63/81),and in those who had deferred cystectomy it was 61.9% (13/21) and 76.2% (16/21),respectively.Of the 32 patients treated with immediate cystectomy,the 5-year overall and tumor specific survival was 59.4%(19/32) and 75.0%(24/32) within a median follow-up of 62(range 4-141)months.There was no statistical difference of the 5-year overall and tumor specific survival be-tween patients treated with bladder preserving approach or immediate cystectomy.Conclusion Blad-der preserving approach and immediate eystectomy might have similar 5-year overall and tumor specific survival for primary T1G3 bladder cancers.
2.Data analysis of renal cell carclnoma database of Shanghai Renji Hospital
Baijun DONG ; Jin ZHANG ; Yonghui CHEN ; Haige CHEN ; Qi CHEN ; Sanwei GUO ; Hanqing XUAN ; Wei XUE ; Lixin ZHOU ; Dongming LIU ; Yiran HUANG
Chinese Journal of Urology 2008;29(4):222-225
Objective To study the histological classification,clinical stage,histological grade and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma by analyzing the records of the patients in Shanghai Renji hospital. Methods A consecutive series of 435 patients with renal cell carcinoma between 2003 and 2005derived from the renal cancer database were reviewed clinically and pathologically.The 1997 version of WHO histological classification for renal epithelial tumor,the 2002 version of AJCC clinical TNM staging system and the 1982 version of Fuhrmaffs system for nuclear grade were used.By survival analysis of 57 cases with advanced renal cell carcinoma using Kaplan-Meier method prognostic factors were confirmed using logrank test. Results Of a total 435 patients,cases were classified into 10(accounting for 2.4%of renal cell tumors)hereditary renal cancer in VHL disease,372(85.5%)clear cell renal cell carcinoma(CCRCC),13(3.0%)papillary renal cell carcinoma(PRCC),18(4.1%)chromophobe renal cell carcinoma(CRCC),4(0.9%)oncocytoma,4(0.9%)carcinoma of the collecting ducts of Bellini(CCDB),and 14(3.2%)renal cell carcinoma unclassified.There were 335(77%)patients undergone radical nephrectomy,74(17%)nephron sparing surgery and 26(6%)others,such as palliative nephrectomy.The patients with VHL disease come from 5 Chinese kindred and all had bilateral clear cell renal cell carcinomas and multifocal renal cysts.There were 7 paients of stage Ⅰ and 3 cases of stage Ⅱ and 6 cases of grade Ⅰ and 4 cases of grade Ⅱ.Genetic test revealed that all patients had VHL gene mutation.4 patients had recurrence while no evidence of local advance and distant metastasis were found during a mean of 28.6 months.Patients with chromophobe RCC are all of stage Ⅰ and 5 cases of grade Ⅰ and 13 cases of gradeⅡ.All patients are alive without recurrence or metastasis during a mean of 19.8 months.Collecting ducts RCC all presented with stage Ⅰ but grade Ⅲand with the median survival only 11.3 Months.Of clear cell and papillary RCC,260(67.6%),64(16.6%),32(8.3 %),29(7.5%)were stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲand Ⅳ,and of stage Ⅰ patients 147(38.2%),113(29.4%)were T1a and T1b respectively.124(32.2%),219(56.9%),40(10.4)and 2(0.5%)were grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ,respectively.Median survival of 57 advanced RCC is 16.0±1.3months,1-year survival is 55%,and 2-year survival is 31%,respectively.By using logrank test,clinical stage(<0.01),tumor size(<0.01),lymphadenopathy(<0.01),metastasis(<0.01)and tumor grade(<0.01)were anatomical and histological prognostic factors for advanced RCC. Coneluslons Different RCC subtypes have different clinical course.The RCC patients in VHL disease have VHL gene mutation and the tumors are often multifocal,bilateral,clear cell type with a low stage and grade which often recurrence but without metastasis.Chromophobe RCC may have a favorable prognosis but collecting duct RCC poor prognosis.In anatomical and histological level,clinical stage,tumor size,lymphadenopathy,metastasis and tumor grade are prognostic factors of survival for advanced RCC.