1.Emaciated Patient with Slowly Progressed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus who had hypoglycemia Despite Impaired Insulin Secretion
Takeshi Ito ; Nobuya Fujita ; Naoki Maeda ; Masayoshi Komura ; Hideto Tomioka ; Nobuki Ohnishi ; Kunihiko Arai ; Mizue Yokoyama ; Ryoji Yoshida
General Medicine 2009;10(1):23-27
We describe a 38-year-old, severely emaciated female with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes mellitus (SPIDDM), who had hypoglycemia due to fasting and an extremely low energy intake. After being diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM), she took in only 300-500 kcal per day and her weight had decreased to 30 kg, with a body mass index (BMI) of 11.4 kg/m2. She was admitted with hypoglycemia, and SPIDDM was confirmed by nearly-completely ceased insulin secretion and seropositivity towards anti-GAD antibody. After appropriate dietary therapy and insulin administration, she recovered from a state of emaciation and her glucose metabolism was restored. With this patient it proved very effective for the general physician to coordinate treatment for both diabetes and an eating disorder.
2.Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study
Yutaka OKAGAWA ; Tetsuya SUMIYOSHI ; Yusuke TOMITA ; Shutaro OIWA ; Fumihiro OGATA ; Takashi JIN ; Masahiro YOSHIDA ; Ryoji FUJII ; Takeyoshi MINAGAWA ; Kohtaro MORITA ; Hideyuki IHARA ; Michiaki HIRAYAMA ; Hitoshi KONDO
Clinical Endoscopy 2020;53(3):339-345
Background/Aims:
The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of screening colonoscopies performed by trainees is often lower than that of colonoscopies performed by experts. The effcacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) in adenoma detection is well documented, especially that of CACs performed by trainees. Endocuff, a new endoscopic cap, is reportedly useful for adenoma detection; however, no trials have compared the effcacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and CAC conducted by trainees. Therefore, the present study retrospectively compared the effcacy between EAC and CAC in trainees.
Methods:
This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 305 patients who underwent either EAC or CAC performed by three trainees between January and December 2018. We evaluated the ADR, mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP), cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and occurrence of complications between the EAC and CAC groups.
Results:
The ADR was significantly higher in the EAC group than in the CAC group (54.3% vs. 37.3%, p=0.019), as was the MAP (1.36 vs. 0.74, p=0.003). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to the cecal intubation rate or cecal intubation time. No major complications occurred in either group.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that EAC exhibits increased ADR and MAP compared to CAC when performed by trainees.