From the surgical stand point of view we have classified 129 patients with aortic dissections, of which anatomic variations were clearly identified. In addition to the DeBakey's nomenclature, we newly employed two groups, aortic arch type and abdominal aortic type. Futhermore, each type was divided into subgroups. This report provides practical and suitable operative approaches according to anatomic variations of the aortic dissecting aneurysms. 1. Twenty-one patients had type I dissections. Thirteen of 21 (62%) were combined with aortic valve regurgitations. 2. Ten patients had type II dissections. Eight of 10 (80%) showed aortic valve regurgitation. This type was further divided into three subgroups. 3. Eighty patients had type III dissections, consisting of 18 type III a and 62 type III b dissections. The type III a dissection included all the cases in which dissections did not involve major branches of the abdominal aorta. Retrograde dissections to the proximal ascending aorta were found in eight patients out of 80 (10%). 4. Twelve patients had aortic arch type dissections. This group was divided into two subgroups, according to the extent of the aortic dissection. 5. Six patients had abdominal aortic type dissections. This group was also subdivided into two. 6. On the basis of the types of dissections outlined above, the most suitable radical operative procedure was selectively proposed in each case.

The patient is a 47-year-old male who presented with abnormal shadows in his chest X-ray. On the third intercostal space, diastolic regurgitant murmur and systolic ejection murmur were heard. X-ray of the chest showed a projection of the right second costal arch in addition to the right atrium shadow. Cardiac catheterization showed no abnormalities except for a rise in the left ventricular end diastolic pressure which was 18mmHg. The patient was found to have Grade II aortic regurgitation. All there findings diagnosis of the case as extra-cardiac right Valsalva sinus aneurysm with aortic regurgitation. Incision of the aneurysm, showed a Valsalva sinus aneurysm having an opening of approximately 3cm just above the right aortic valve ring with the orifice of the right coronary artery occluded. Complete patch closure was performed with elevation of the aortic valve ring. No reconstruction for the right coronary artery was made.

Marfan's syndrome associated with multiple arterial aneurysms of the abodominal aortic branches in a pair of identical twins is described. The first case, a 21-year-old male, visited our affiliated hospital because of severe upper abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) and aortography (AOG) demonstrated multiple abdominal aneurysms, i.e., celiac artery, bilateral renal arteries and superior mesenteric artery, but there were no findings of dissecting aneurysm of the aorta. The aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery, which had ruptured, was replaced with a greater saphenous vein graft. The postoperative course was uneventful until sudden cardiac arrest occurred on the 5th POD. An autopsy revealed a dissecting aortic aneurysm (DeBakey type I), massive intrathoracic hemorrhage, and subarachnoidal hemorrhage. Two years later, the second case, the 23-year-old twin brother of the prior case, visited our hospital because of upper abdominal pain similar to that of his brother. The clinical course bore a close resemblance to his brother's. CT and AOG revealed the intact aorta and aneurysms of the celiac artery and right renal artery. The ruptured aneurysm of the celiac artery was ligated. Immediately after his returning to the ICU, he developed sudden massive intrathoracic bleeding and cardiac arrest. This is the fourth report of identical twins with Marfan's syndrome in Japan. It is also noteworthy that in both cases rupture of the extra-aortic aneurysm occurred prior to the aortic dissection or aneurysmal formation.

Among 232 patients undergoing repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) during a 10-year period, 5 (2.2%) patients had evidence of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAA). We examined their clinical course, laboratory, operative and histopathological findings, and considered possible correlations between their diagnosis and surgical treatment. Among these cases of IAAA, 2 patients complained of severe abdominal or back pain. The differential diagnosis from rupture of AAA was difficult in these cases. They also showed inflammatory signs in laboratory, operative and histopathological findings. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging appear to offer reliable means for diagnosing IAAA; In particular we could recognize the“Inflammatory mantle”in 3 cases, which indicated IAAA. In the surgical treatment, the presence of IAAA necessitates certain modifications in the surgical approach, in order to avoid injuring the retroperitoneal and abdominal structures. We could observe post-operative change in the thickness of the aortic wall, which decreases with time without anti-inflammatory agents.