Objective: To report the case of a woman who underwent smell training for post-infectious olfactory dysfunction presumably from COVID-19. Methods: Design: Case Report. Setting: Tertiary Private Training Hospital. Patient: One. Result: A 41-year-old woman who developed olfactory dysfunction attributed to COVID-19 underwent smell training. At baseline, her responses were mostly “no smell,” and those reported as “can smell a bit” were rated as distorted. After three months, she could now smell items that she previously could not smell, but these smells were still distorted. At the time of this writing, she was on her 4th month of smell training. Conclusion Although we cannot rule out spontaneous resolution of anosmia in our patient, we would like to think that smell training contributed to her recovery of smell.
Anosmia ; Anosmia ; Olfactory Bulb ; Olfaction Disorders

<p style="text-align: justify;">OBJECTIVES: This study determined the initial otoacoustic (OAE) hearing screening results of newborns with collapsed ear canals and vernix caseosa in the ear canal and compared these to ears that were patent.
METHODS: Two hundred term newborns (400 ears) with normal APGAR scores, birth weight, maternal and gestational history, who were born between August 2013 to October 2013 and who had OAE hearing screening test done by trained midwives were included in this study. All of them underwent otoscopy after the OAE hearing screening test was done to determine patency of the ear canal and presence of vernix caseosa. The examining physician was blinded to the OAE results. Comparison between the OAE results and the otoscopic findings were done.
RESULTS: Four hundred ears were included in the study. Two hundred and fifty one ears (62.8%) had vernix caseosa and 42 ears (10.5%) had collapsed ear canal. The overall initial OAE hearing screening test pass rate of the newborns tested was 69.5%. The initial OAE hearing screening test pass rate of newborns those with ear canal vernix caseosa or collapsed ear canal, were 72.1% and 47.6%, respectively. Patent ears were found in 107 (26.7%) with a pass rate of 71.9%.
CONCLUSION:The pass rates of ears with vernix caseosa and collapsed ear canal were 72.1% and 47.6%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the OAE hearing screening test pass rates of ears with patent canal and ears that were collapsed and/ or had vernix caseosa. However, there was a statistically significant difference in pass rates between patent ear canals and collapsed ear canalp>
Otoscopy ; Infant, Newborn ; Vernix Caseosa