1.Diagnostic Tests for Viral Hepatitis.
Korean Journal of Medicine 2013;85(3):267-271
No abstract available.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
;
Hepatitis
2.Standardization of the test BEC 96 for elderly.
Journal of Practical Medicine 2002;435(11):42-44
31 healthy person with average ages of 76.3 (s.o=6.4), being the normal life were studied by 8 tests of BEC according to the instruction. The advantage of BEC 96 was actual evaluation of functions, suitable capacity of evaluation and time of evaluation. The Vietnamese version of test can be applied in practising the gerontology in Vietnam. However, the nervous-psychological tests were valuable only when related with the clinical and considered seperately for individuals.
Aged
;
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
3.Some biochemical indicators in healthy Vietnamese people measured by automatic analyser
Journal of Vietnamese Medicine 1999;232(1):129-133
The authors have examined the biochemistry activity of the hospital during the past 4-5 years. The numbers of the tests have been raising from 52,000 to 140,000/year. The different kinds of tests have been raising from 55 to 90. The quality of the tests is poor; now 90% of them give high precise results.
Biochemistry
;
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
4.Decisions on what diagnostic tests to request
John Michael D. Deblois ; Nenacia Ranali Nirena P. Mendoza
The Filipino Family Physician 2022;60(1):26-33
In Evidence-based Family Practice, requesting a diagnostic test should be based on two issues. First is whether the test is accurate and thus will significantly help in clinical decision making. Second is whether the test is appropriate and acceptable for the patient. This involves careful discussion of risks and benefits based on the physician’s knowledge and experience and the patient’s values and preferences.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
5.Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal.
Ji Eun PARK ; Kyunghwa HAN ; Yu Sub SUNG ; Mi Sun CHUNG ; Hyun Jung KOO ; Hee Mang YOON ; Young Jun CHOI ; Seung Soo LEE ; Kyung Won KIM ; Youngbin SHIN ; Suah AN ; Hyo Min CHO ; Seong Ho PARK
Korean Journal of Radiology 2017;18(6):888-897
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and adequacy of statistical analyses in a general radiology journal when reporting a reliability analysis for a diagnostic test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three studies of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) and 36 studies reporting reliability analyses published in the Korean Journal of Radiology between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed. Studies were judged using the methodological guidelines of the Radiological Society of North America-Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (RSNA-QIBA), and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. DTA studies were evaluated by nine editorial board members of the journal. Reliability studies were evaluated by study reviewers experienced with reliability analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one (49.2%) of the 63 DTA studies did not include a reliability analysis when deemed necessary. Among the 36 reliability studies, proper statistical methods were used in all (5/5) studies dealing with dichotomous/nominal data, 46.7% (7/15) of studies dealing with ordinal data, and 95.2% (20/21) of studies dealing with continuous data. Statistical methods were described in sufficient detail regarding weighted kappa in 28.6% (2/7) of studies and regarding the model and assumptions of intraclass correlation coefficient in 35.3% (6/17) and 29.4% (5/17) of studies, respectively. Reliability parameters were used as if they were agreement parameters in 23.1% (3/13) of studies. Reproducibility and repeatability were used incorrectly in 20% (3/15) of studies. CONCLUSION: Greater attention to the importance of reporting reliability, thorough description of the related statistical methods, efforts not to neglect agreement parameters, and better use of relevant terminology is necessary.
Biomarkers
;
Diagnostic Tests, Routine*
;
Methods*
6.Comparative study od serologic diagnostic tests against Hantaan virus.
Ki Joon SONG ; Luck Ju BAEK ; Ho Wang LEE
Journal of the Korean Society of Virology 1991;21(2):87-103
No abstract available.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine*
;
Hantaan virus*
7.A Study of the Lacrimal Passage by the Simple Taste Test.
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 1975;16(4):375-377
A simple diagnostic test has been performed for the evaluation of the patency of the lacrimal excretory system. A 1% Saccharine solution was instilled in the lower conjuctival cul-de-sac and then tastfd by the patknt when it reachd the oropharynx; this painless and effective test was performed in study using 100 subjects. The average time lapse between instillation and testing was 7 and 1/6 minutes. Of the 100 subjects, 46% had a positive taste response within 5 minutes, 79% within 10 minutes, 88% within 15 minutes, and 97% within 20 minutes.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
;
Oropharynx
;
Saccharin
8.Color test using the Hahn Pseudoisochromatic Plates.
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 1980;21(3):239-246
The Hahn Pseudoisochromatic Plates were used to test the color sense of 100 color defective subjects. Results and data obtained from the test showed the plates to be practically useful in screening. qualitative and quantitative diagnostic test for congenital color defective subjects.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
;
Mass Screening
9.Overuse of Diagnostic Testing in the Management of Korean Patients with Acute Pyelonephritis.
Infection and Chemotherapy 2017;49(1):84-86
No abstract available.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine*
;
Humans
;
Pyelonephritis*
10.Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation?.
Young Jun CHOI ; Mi Sun CHUNG ; Hyun Jung KOO ; Ji Eun PARK ; Hee Mang YOON ; Seong Ho PARK
Korean Journal of Radiology 2016;17(5):706-714
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate with which diagnostic test accuracy studies that are published in a general radiology journal adhere to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015, and to explore the relationship between adherence rate and citation rate while avoiding confounding by journal factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All eligible diagnostic test accuracy studies that were published in the Korean Journal of Radiology in 2011-2015 were identified. Five reviewers assessed each article for yes/no compliance with 27 of the 30 STARD 2015 checklist items (items 28, 29, and 30 were excluded). The total STARD score (number of fulfilled STARD items) was calculated. The score of the 15 STARD items that related directly to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 was also calculated. The number of times each article was cited (as indicated by the Web of Science) after publication until March 2016 and the article exposure time (time in months between publication and March 2016) were extracted. RESULTS: Sixty-three articles were analyzed. The mean (range) total and QUADAS-2-related STARD scores were 20.0 (14.5-25) and 11.4 (7-15), respectively. The mean citation number was 4 (0-21). Citation number did not associate significantly with either STARD score after accounting for exposure time (total score: correlation coefficient = 0.154, p = 0.232; QUADAS-2-related score: correlation coefficient = 0.143, p = 0.266). CONCLUSION: The degree of adherence to STARD 2015 was moderate for this journal, indicating that there is room for improvement. When adjusted for exposure time, the degree of adherence did not affect the citation rate.
Checklist
;
Compliance
;
Diagnostic Tests, Routine*
;
Publications