Infection with adult Ascaris primarily occurs in the gastrointestinal system, but physical migrationother than this has been reported. To date, only a small number of cases have been reported to involvethe urinary system and no report of Ascariasis migration to the retroperitoneal space.This is a case of a 38-year-old female admitted as a case of perinephric abscess, renal mass right.Patient was initially managed conservatively with broad spectrum antibiotics and tube drainage, butwith the deteriorating condition, an exploratory laparotomy, with retroperitoneal exploration wasdone. During exploration, no colonic fistula was noted. The renal parenchyma was noted to bepinkish with a 1cm opening at the mid lateral pole associated with purulent discharge. Interestingly,a 6cm x 1cm wax-like, moving structure was found in the retroperitoneal space The object wasremoved with Debakey forceps and was determined to be Ascaris lumbricoides by histopathology.Fecal analysis of stool for ova and parasites was negative for Ascaris. The patient then had an uneventfulrecovery.Currently, there are only two theories on how Ascaris lumbricoides can be introduced into the urinarysystem. The first includes fistulation between the GI and urinary system and second by retrogrademigration of the adult worm through the urethra. Given the current data, the authors believe that thepatient experienced retrograde invasion of Ascaris through the urethra, and subsequently migrated tothe retroperitoneal space through fistulation.Ascariasis of the genitourinary tract is a rare condition. This is the first reported case of ascariasis inthe retroperitoneum.
Ascaris lumbricoides

Penile calciphylaxis is a rare penile condition associated with end-stage renal disease and is found in 1-4% of hemodialysis patients. The condition has an overall mortality of 64%. Literature has yet to provide a gold standard for the management of this condition. The first case is a 58-year-old diabetic and hypertensive on hemodialysis who presented with ulcerating lesions on the penis. The patient underwent partial penectomy. The patient contracted pneumonia during recovery and expired 3 months after the procedure. The second case is a 56-year-old diabetic with end stage renal disease on dialysis who presented with dry gangrene of the penis. He underwent partial penectomy and was sent home after recovery.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate male lower urinary tract symptoms between age, quality of life scores,parameters of uroflowmetry and prostate size. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight males were included in this study. Uroflowmetry parameters,age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QoL) scores and prostate sizewere gathered. For correlation, distribution of age, uroflowmetry parameters and prostate size werefirst compared to IPSS. Analysis of variance was used to compare age of patients, while Kruskall-wallis test was used to compare the QoL, uroflowmetry parameters, and prostate size on each IPSSgroups. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to correlate IPSS to age, quality of life,uroflowmetry parameters, and prostate size both for multivariate and univariate analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between age and IPSS. However, on profile distribution,the age distribution between symptom scores were statistically similar. Qol scores were directlyproportional to IPSS. Thus, patients with a worse QoL score were more likely to have higher IPSS.Qmax scores decreased as symptom severity increased. Patients with higher Qmax scores are lesslikely to have higher IPSS scores. Voided volume was observed to decrease as IPSS severity increased,but this was not statistically significant. Patients with higher post void residual scores were morelikely to have higher IPSS. There was also no significant correlation between prostate size and IPSS. CONCLUSION There were no significant correlation between IPSS and age, voided volume and prostatesize. On the other hand, patients with a worse QoL score and a high post void residual had higherIPSS. Patients with a high Qmax, are less likely to have an elevated IPSS.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview on the impact of healthcare disruption by the COVID-19 pandemic to urology training programs in the Philippines. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was used in collaboration with the study done by Rosen, et al. last May 2020. Telephone survey of the study population was done determining the status of resident staffing, workload, health/wellness, and didactics. Numerical and categorical data were analyzed and descriptive statistics are provided. RESULTS: All the observations on resident time in the workplace, including assignment to teams (81%), redeployment responses (55-97%), and remote clinical work (65%) were significant. Fifty one percent of residents have decreased research load. Eighty one percent have didactics in small groups. Fifty-five percent have 1 to 2 Video-based learning/conferences per week (p=0.007) followed by those with 3-4 with 98% (p=0.120) and those with >5 with only 6% (p=0.729). For Resident health and wellness, 87% of the residents were exposed to COVID-positive patients, but only 8% of residents were COVID positive (p=0.591). Lastly, 59% of the participants do not have access to wellness programs. CONCLUSION Data from respondents revealed significant changes in the different aspects of the present study. Urology residents spent more time away from their specialties, and have been re-deployed to COVID-19 floors. Ambulatory services, conferences, educational lectures have mostly shifted to virtual platforms. Resident concerns for COVID-19 exposure have been addressed properly; however, wellness programs have not been widely available for residents. As a first national survey, the present study may give significant insights on program changes and may be used as preliminary data for future studies.
Philippines