Background: Lopinavir/Ritonavir is an oral combination agent being used to treat Human Immunodeficiency Virus. It was demonstrated to have clinical and in vitro activity against coronaviruses. There are no specific anti viral preparation or biologic agents currently recommended to treat Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2(SARS-CoV-2) infection. There are no in-vitro studies published as well, for Lopinavir/ritonavir against SARS- CoV-2. However, recent case series and cohort studies showed earlier clinical improvement and shorter duration of viral shedding were noted especially if the combination drug is administered early in the course of the disease. Objective: The objective of this review is to search, retrieve, appraise and summarize existing studies and clinical trials regarding the efficacy and safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir combination in the treatment of SARS Cov-2 infection. The evidenced based recommendations may be used as a guide by clinicians and practitioners in their current practice. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for evidences (Medline, CENTRAL, ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrial. gov and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) and articles were selected based on a pre-defined criteria according to population, intervention, outcome and study designs. Results: Two randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment did not significantly accelerate clinical improvement, reduce mortality, or shoten the viral RNA detectability in patients with serious COVID-19. Conclusion There is little evidence to conclude on the effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with COVID-19. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.
Lopinavir ; Ritonavir ; COVID-19

Based on reporting in the last several years, an impressive but dismal list of cytotoxic chemotherapies that fail to prolong the median overall survival of patients with glioblastoma has prompted the development of treatment protocols designed to interfere with growth-facilitating signaling systems by using non-cytotoxic, non-oncology drugs. Recent recognition of the pro-mobility stimulus, interleukin-18, as a driver of centrifugal glioblastoma cell migration allows potential treatment adjuncts with disulfiram and ritonavir. Disulfiram and ritonavir are well-tolerated, non-cytotoxic, non-oncology chemotherapeutic drugs that are marketed for the treatment of alcoholism and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, respectively. Both drugs exhibit an interleukin-18-inhibiting function. Given the favorable tolerability profile of disulfiram and ritonavir, the unlikely drug-drug interaction with temozolomide, and the poor prognosis of glioblastoma, trials of addition of disulfiram and ritonavir to current standard initial treatment of glioblastoma would be warranted.
Antineoplastic Agents ; Dacarbazine ; analogs & derivatives ; Disulfiram ; Glioblastoma ; Humans ; Interleukin-18 ; Ritonavir

BACKGROUND: Data regarding differences of intolerance between a ritonavir-unboosted and a ritonavir-boosted atazanavir regimen in HIV-infected Koreans is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was conducted of the incidence of severe hyperbilirubinemia (serum total bilirubin >3.1 mg/dL) and discontinuation of atazanavir in HIV-infected patients who had received an atazanavir-containing regimen at Seoul National University Hospital from 2005 to 2009. Patients with active liver disease were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Of a total of 335 patients receiving an atazanavir-containing regimen, 145 (43.3%) received treatment with a ritonavir-boosted regimen. The cumulative incidence of severe hyperbilirubinemia at three months was 40.5% in patients receiving a ritonavir-boosted atazanavir regimen and 21.4% in patients receiving an un-boosted atazanavir regimen (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of severe hyperbilirubinemia at 12 months was 58.5% in patients receiving a ritonavir-boosted regimen and 41.3% in those receiving an un-boosted regimen (P=0.008). The proportion of drug discontinuation due to jaundice during the 12-month period was 11.7% in patients receiving a ritonavir-boosted regimen and 5.3% in those receiving an un-boosted regimen (P=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of severe hyperbilirubinemia and discontinuation of atazanavir due to jaundice was significantly more common in HIV-infected Koreans who received a ritonavir-boosted atazanavir regimen than in those who received a ritonavir-un-boosted atazanavir regimen.
Atazanavir Sulfate ; Bilirubin ; HIV ; Humans ; Hyperbilirubinemia ; Incidence ; Jaundice ; Liver Diseases ; Oligopeptides ; Pyridines ; Ritonavir

A liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for the determination of lopinavir and ritonavir in human plasma. Analytes were separated from plasma by a combination of alkalinized protein precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column with the mobile phase consisted of methanol-0.1% formic acid in water (80:20). A tandem mass spectrometer equipped with electrospray ionization source was used as detector and operated in the positive ion mode. Quantification was performed using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of the transitions m/z 629.6 --> 155.2, m/z 721.4 --> 268.2, and m/z 515.2 --> 276.2 for lopinavir, ritonavir and telmisartan (internal standard), respectively. The method showed a good linearity in a concentration range of 62.5 - 10000 ng mL(-1) for lopinavir, and 12.5 - 2000 ng mL(-1) for ritonavir. The lower limits of quantification were 15 pg mL(-1) and 8 pg mL(-1) for lopinavir and ritonavir, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precision was less than 15% and the absolute recovery was above 75%. This method was selective and rapid, sensitive for investigating blood drug concentrations in clinics.
Chromatography, Liquid ; methods ; HIV Infections ; blood ; Humans ; Lopinavir ; blood ; Ritonavir ; blood ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; methods

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has stimulated tremendous efforts to develop therapeutic agents that target severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to control viral infection. So far, a few small-molecule antiviral drugs, including nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid), remdesivir, and molnupiravir have been marketed for the treatment of COVID-19. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir has been recommended by the World Health Organization as an early treatment for outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, the existing treatment options have limitations, and effective treatment strategies that are cost-effective and convenient for tackling COVID-19 are still needed. To date, four domestically developed oral anti-COVID-19 drugs have been granted conditional market approval in China. These drugs include azvudine, simnotrelvir-ritonavir (Xiannuoxin), leritrelvir, and mindeudesivir (VV116). Preclinical and clinical studies have explored the efficacy and tolerability of mindeudesivir and supported its early use in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 cases at high risk for progression. In this review, we discuss the most recent findings regarding the pharmacological mechanism and therapeutic effects focusing on mindeudesivir and other small-molecule antiviral agents for COVID-19. These findings will expand our understanding and highlight the potential widespread application of China's homegrown anti-COVID-19 drugs.
Humans ; Ritonavir/therapeutic use* ; COVID-19 ; Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use* ; China ; Nitriles ; Lactams ; Proline ; Adenosine/analogs & derivatives* ; Leucine

OBJECTIVE: To describe negative conversion and rebound of patients with severe and critical acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection after treatment with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, and to analyze related factors associating with failure of SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion and relapse and prognosis. METHODS: A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients aged ≥ 16 years old who were diagnosed with severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 infection and took Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for 5 days in Peking University First Hospital from December 7, 2022 to January 27, 2023, were included. General characteristics and clinical data were collected from electronic medical record system. The Kaplan-Meier curve of SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion was drawn. Factors with P < 0.10 were incorporated into multivariate Logistic regression model to analyze the relationship between the factors and persistent nucleic acid positive and rebound. RESULTS: A total of 31 severe and 37 critical SARS-CoV-2 infection patients were included. The median duration from initiation of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir to negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 for both was 6.0 days, and the negative conversion rate on day 15 was 93.5% and 86.5%, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 rebound was observed in 7 patients (11.3%), among whom were 1 severe patient and 6 critical patients. The above 7 patients with SARS-CoV-2 rebound and 6 patients with failure of SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion were compared with 55 patients with persistent negative conversion. Factors with P < 0.10, including the lowest lymphocyte count (LYM), the highest D-dimer, the highest procalcitonin (PCT), the lowest Ct value, cardiovascular diseases other than hypertension and coronary heart disease, were incorporated into multivariate Logistic regression analysis. The decreased LYM [odds ratio (OR) = 0.146, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.031-0.689, P = 0.015] and the increased PCT (OR = 2.008, 95%CI was 1.042-3.868, P = 0.037) were revealed to be independent risk factors of the failure of SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion or rebound. The proportion of mechanical ventilation and invasive ventilation were significantly higher in patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection or rebound than those in patients with SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion (84.6% vs. 38.2%, 69.2% vs. 25.5%, both P < 0.01), but no significant difference in mechanical ventilation and invasive ventilation duration was observed. Compared with the patients with SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion, more patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection or rebound were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU, 76.9% vs. 50.9%), and length of ICU stay in patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection or rebound tended to be longer [days: 13.0 (10.3, 24.3) vs. 11.0 (5.3, 23.0), P > 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS The decreased LYM and increased PCT are independent risk factors for the failure of SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion or rebound in patients with severe and critical SARS-CoV-2 infection. Attention should be paid to these patients for their poor prognosis.
Humans ; Adolescent ; COVID-19 ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Retrospective Studies ; Ritonavir/therapeutic use* ; Critical Illness ; COVID-19 Drug Treatment

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects of various HIV protease inhibitors on the function of pancreatic beta-cells.

METHODSRat insulinoma INS-1 cells were incubated with different concentrations of ritonavir or amprenavir for 48 h and stimulated with 20 mmol/L D-glucose for 30 min. The rate of insulin release was measured in the supernatant by ELISA, normalized to cellular DNA contents. Cells were counted with trypan blue and MTT test were determined to evaluate the effect of protease inhibitors on cell viability.

RESULTRitonavir treatment significantly decreased baseline insulin release and glucose-stimulated insulin release in a dose-dependent manner (r=-0.861, -0.839, both P<0.01). For 10 micromol/L of ritonavir, the decrease rate of baseline insulin secretion and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was 46% and 47%, respectively. Amprenavir had no effect on the rate of insulin release.

CONCLUSIONVarious HIV protease inhibitors present different effect on the insulin release of pancreatic beta-cells.

Animals ; Carbamates ; pharmacology ; HIV Protease Inhibitors ; pharmacology ; Insulin ; secretion ; Insulinoma ; metabolism ; pathology ; Islets of Langerhans ; metabolism ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; metabolism ; pathology ; Rats ; Ritonavir ; pharmacology ; Sulfonamides ; pharmacology

Objective: To summarize the application experience and the therapeutic effect of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir (trade name: Paxlovid) for COVID-19 in children. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data, including collecting the clinical manifestations and clinical outcomes, dynamically monitoring the blood routine, hepatic and renal function and SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid results, and observing the related side effects during the treatment, etc, of 3 cases with COVID-19 treated with Paxlovid admitted to Shanghai Children's Hospital (designated referral hospital for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Shanghai) from May 1^st to June 1^st, 2022. Results: The 3 cases were 12, 14, 17 years of age, among which 2 cases were males, 1 case was female. All 3 cases were mild cases with underlying diseases and risk of developing into severe COVID-19, with symptoms of high fever, sore throat and dry cough. The treatment of Paxlovid at 3^rd day of symptom onset contributed to the symptom-free after 1-2 days and negative results of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid after 2-4 days. All patients had no adverse manifestations of gastrointestinal tract and nervous system but a case had little skin rashes, which recovered after the withdrawal of Paxlovid. Three cases had normal hepatic and renal function during the Paxlovid treatment. At 3 months after discharge, no clinical manifestations of post-COVID syndrome were found in all 3 cases. Conclusion: Paxlovid was effective and relatively safe in the treatment of 3 children with COVID-19.
Child ; Male ; Humans ; Female ; COVID-19 ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Ritonavir/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; China ; Nucleic Acids ; COVID-19 Drug Treatment

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has occasioned worldwide alarm. Globally, the number of reported confirmed cases has exceeded 84.3 million as of this writing (January 2, 2021). Since there are no targeted therapies for COVID-19, the current focus is the repurposing of drugs approved for other uses. In some clinical trials, antiviral drugs such as remdesivir (Grein et al., 2020), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) (Cao et al., 2020), chloroquine (Gao et al., 2020), hydroxychloroquine (Gautret et al., 2020), arbidol (Wang et al., 2020), and favipiravir (Cai et al., 2020b) have shown efficacy in COVID-19 patients. LPV/r combined with arbidol, which is the basic regimen in some regional hospitals in China including Zhejiiang Province, has shown antiviral effects in COVID-19 patients (Guo et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). A retrospective cohort study also reported that this combination therapy showed better efficacy than LPV/r alone for the treatment of COVID-19 patients (Deng et al., 2020).
Animals ; COVID-19/drug therapy* ; Drug Interactions ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Indoles/pharmacokinetics* ; Lopinavir/pharmacokinetics* ; Male ; Rats ; Retrospective Studies ; Ritonavir/pharmacokinetics* ; SARS-CoV-2

The combination of atazanavir (ATV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) has been used as a salvage regimen for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. In this paper, we discuss two cases of HIV-positive patients who had long histories of virological failure following a heavy treatment of antiretroviral drugs, but then achieved virological suppression with double-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimens. In patients with multiple genotypic resistance to PIs and NRTIs, virological suppression can be achieved with a combination of ATV plus LPV/RTV with an NRTI backbone. The two cases in this report suggest that a combination of ATV plus LPV/RTV could be a useful salvage regimen for the subset of HIV-positive patients with limited treatment options.
Adult ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; HIV Infections/*drug therapy ; HIV Protease Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Oligopeptides/*administration & dosage ; Pyridines/*administration & dosage ; Pyrimidinones/*administration & dosage ; Ritonavir/*administration & dosage