Problem: As of 2022, only 49 graduates of the Philippines’ Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP) were employed by the Philippine Government, emphasizing the urgent need to increase the number of practicing field epidemiologists to better equip the country for public health emergencies. Context: The FETP–Intermediate Course (IC) curriculum is based mainly on the module of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that was incorporated into the Philippine context. It consists of five 1–2-week lecture series that provide participants with the knowledge and tools necessary to conduct job-relevant field projects. Individual projects are the centrepiece of the FETP–IC ,requiring trainees to investigate outbreaks, design and develop protocols, conduct field data collection, manage data, analyse data, interpret data, write reports and deliver oral presentations. Action: To address the shortage of practicing field epidemiologists in the Philippines, a subnational initiative in Northern Luzon was implemented. Outcome: Within 3 years, the two FETP–IC subnational training programmes have produced 42 applied epidemiologists who will strengthen epidemiology and surveillance in their respective localities. As of February 2023, 92 studies have been conducted, including 39 outbreak investigations, 37 data quality analysis/process improvement projects, 10 epidemiological studies and six surveillance evaluations. Discussion: By training and deploying skilled epidemiologists to local health offices and hospitals, the programme is helping to improve the capacity of the health system to respond to public health threats and protect the health of the population. The programme’s emphasis on practical training and real-world experience is an effective way to build a strong and sustainable epidemiological workforce.

Objective: The event-based surveillance and response report from the municipality of Buguias in the Philippines covering the period 1 January to 29 October 2022 indicated an unusual increase in the number of typhoid cases that surpassed the epidemic threshold for consecutive weeks. An investigation was conducted to confirm the existence of an outbreak, identify the source(s) of transmission and recommend prevention and control measures. Methods: The investigation employed a descriptive design. Medical records were reviewed to verify diagnoses and to identify cases that met case definitions. Key informant interviews were conducted to identify possible sources of transmission and investigate the reporting of cases in the Philippine Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (PIDSR) system. Results: A total of 220 cases of typhoid fever were captured by the PIDSR system. Of the 208 suspected cases that were reviewed, only 15 (7.2%) met the case definition used in this investigation. Fourteen of these 15 verified cases were interviewed; five (35.7%) were farmers and 13 (92.8%) reported using springs as their main water source and source of drinking water. Reporting of cases in the PIDSR system was largely based on the final chart diagnosis or a positive Typhidot or Tubex rapid diagnostic test result. The PIDSR case definition was not followed in the reporting of cases. Discussion: This study provides evidence of endemicity of typhoid fever in Buguias, Benguet, Philippines. However, from January to October 2022, cases were overreported by the surveillance system. Medical record reviews showed that most reported suspected cases did not meet case definition criteria. This finding emphasizes the need to improve typhoid guidelines with regards to diagnosis using rapid diagnostic tests and to investigate the cost-effectiveness of making confirmatory laboratory tests for typhoid available in the Philippines.