No abstract available.
Retrospective Studies*

No abstract available.
Retrospective Studies*

Although most available IOL power calculation formulas perform accurately for eyes of average axial length, they have been shown to be inaccurate for eyes that have unusually short and long axial length. To compare the prediction accuracy of new Hoffer Q with SRK-II formula, we reviewed, retrospectively, a series of 225 ECCE with PCL implantation cases, including 106 Hoffer Q group and 119 SRK-II group, each of which was further divided into subgroups based on axial length. The Hoffer Q formula overestimated the refraction and resulted in more myopic shift and was less accurate than SRK-II in all length eyes, except short length eyes. In short length eyes, both formulas had similar mean error and mean absolute error but Hoffer Q formula was more accurate than the SRK-II in +/- 0.5D prediction proportion.
Retrospective Studies

Authors retrospectively analyzed 22 cases of inferior oblique overaction, which were treated by means of infetior tlblique recession from May 1983 to June 1985. We compared preoperative and postoperative hyperdeviation in the primary position and adduction, and calculated the amount of corrected hyperdeviations in the prirrtary position and adduction pet millimeter of inferior oblique recession. The results were as follows: 1. The overall success rate was 84.4 % in primary inferior oblique overaction. 2. The amounts of correction in the primary position per millimeter of inferior oblique recession were 0.69 prism diopter. 3. The amounts of correction in adduction per millimeter of inferior oblique recession were 1.94 prism diopter. 4. Decrement amounts in adduction compared to in the primary position were 1.59 prism diopter per millimeter of inferior oblique recession.
Retrospective Studies

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiologic results of unilateral or bilateral minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) and conventional open lumbar interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Only a few studies have compared the slip reduction and fusion rate between unilateral or bilateral MIS TLIF and conventional open TLIF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2007 and May 2015, 80 patients with single-level low-grade spondylolisthesis underwent unilateral MIS TLIF (26 patients), bilateral MIS TLIF (10 patients), or open TLIF (44 patients) by a single surgeon. Radiologic studies were performed preoperatively, 2 weeks postoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively. Slip reduction, the lumbar lordortic angle, and the fusion rate were analyzed. RESULTS: The 3 groups exhibited significantly improved slip after operation. Significant differences were found among the 3 groups (p=0.015) and between the MIS TLIF group (31.76%±14.42%) and the open TLIF group (41.66%±15.98%) (p=0.01) in the slip reduction rate at 2 weeks after the operation. However, no significant difference was found between unilateral MIS TLIF and bilateral MIS TLIF (37.61%±15.0% vs. 29.5%±13.82%, p=0.148). In the lumbar lordotic angle, no significant difference was found among the 3 groups. There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in slip reduction or the fusion rate at 12 months after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that unilateral MIS TLIF showed a similar slip reduction and fusion rate to bilateral MIS TLIF, but that conventional open TLIF showed better slip reduction than MIS TLIF, although it had a similar fusion rate.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Spondylolisthesis*

No abstract available.
Peptic Ulcer* ; Retrospective Studies*

No abstract available.
Myelitis, Transverse* ; Retrospective Studies*

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluated the clinical and radiological effectiveness of sacral alar screws for augmentation of S1 pedicle screws in long-level fusion including L5-S1 segment. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: The fusion rates of lumbosacral junction in long-level fusion are various when S1 pedicle screws are used without augmentation. But, reports of sacral alar screw augmentation are rare. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1996 to 2005, 63 patients performed more than two-level fusion including lumbosacral junction were reviewed. 47 patients underwent lumbosacral fusion with S1 pedicle screws only (S1 group), and 16 patients with sacral alar screws augmentation in addition to S1 pedicle screws (S1-2 group). Radiologically, bony union, halo sign, and breakage of implants were evaluated. Clinically, complications associated with screw placement and general complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Bony union was obtained in 56 cases(89%) at postoperative 4.3 months. Nonunion was observed in 7 cases(11%, S1 group:5, S1-2 group:2). Loosening of S1 pedicle screw was observed in 32 cases(89%) of S1 group and in 4 cases(25%) of S1-2 group. It showed statistical significance between two groups. Sacral alar screw loosening occurred in 8 cases(50%) of S1-2 group. Metal breakage was developed in 2 cases of S1 group without nonunion or loosening. Postoperative infection occurred in 7 cases(11%, S1 group:5, S1-2 group:2). CONCLUSIONS: Sacral alar screw augmentation was effective on protecting the loosening of S1 pedicle screw. Additional sacral alar screw can improve the rate of fusion for lumbosacral junction despite no statistical significance.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Succinates

STUDY DESIGN: The authors retrospectively analysed the difference of clinical natures in contained vs. ruptured HIVD. OBJECTIVE: To compare contained HIVD with ruptured HIVD in respect of clinical symptoms, signs and the result after surgery. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: In contained disc herniation, the disc material remains beneath tile intact outer annulus. But, once disc material penetrates through the limit of posterior annulus, it is a ruptured herniation or disc extrusion/sequestration. There is few report concerning the clinical characteristics related to type of herniation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients, treated by open discectomy from March 1990 to December 1994, were followed up for minimum two years. The clinical symptoms and signs including SLR, motor deficit, sensory deficit, change of DTR, and severity of radiating pain were periodically followed up on the predesigned protocol. Result: Twenty patients had contained disc and remaining 26 had ruptured disc. The mean age of contained disc was 31.4 years and that of ruptured disc was 43.3 years. In preoperative examination, 18/26 cases of patients with ruptured discs, developed pain in less than 3 months, compared with 7/20 cases of does with contained ones. Motor deficit was positive in 25/26 cases (96.2%) of ruptured discs and 12/20 cases (60%) of contained ones. 23/26 cases (80.8%) of patients with ruptured discs, had sensory deficit compared with 12/20 cases (60%) of those with contained ones. There was no significant difference in SLR and DTR change between ruptured and contained disc. CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as age, motor and sensory deficits and duration of symptoms had correlation with the type of herniation, but SLR and DTR change showed no statistical difference in this study. Clinical outcome showed no significant difference between two groups, but in ruptured group, the results were getting worse with the time goes. On the basis of this study, we concluded that the clinical symptoms and signs were different between the two groups, but surgical results showed no statistical difference.
Diskectomy ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study on the effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for maintaining the reduction in isthmic spondylolisthesis patients. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy of performing posterior lumbar interbody fusion for maintaining the reduction in isthmic spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW: There have been many reports regarding the surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis. Although there are many reports that the clinical results have nothing to do with the reduction, many surgeons have tried to maintain the reduction. However, the question about what kind of fusion modality is the most effective for maintaining the reduction is still controversial. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between August 2002 and January 2004, 24 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis were operated on. 14 underwent posterolateral fusion alone (group A) and 10 underwent additional posterior interbody fusion (group B). These two groups were compared in terms of the clinical results, the radiological changes and fusion rates. RESULTS: the reduction rate were 11.81% and 7.32% in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (p>0.05). The reduction losses were 0.19% and 0.35% in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (p>0.05). The changes after fusion were 0.11% and 0.10% in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (p>0.05). There was no case of nonunion. The satisfaction rates were 86% and 83% in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the addition of posterior interbody fusion showed no benefit in maintaining correction. If solid fusion can be obtained, then posterolateral fusion seems to be sufficient enough to maintain correction in isthmic spondylolisthesis. The authors think that further studies are mandatory because of the small number subjects in our study.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Spondylolisthesis*