Purpose:To detect the expression of MDR 1 / P-gp,C-erbB-2 in breast cancer and study the correlation between MDR 1 /P-gp and C-erbB-2. Methods:Expression of MDR 1 gene was measured with the flu orogenic quantitative RT-PCR method in 57 cases of breast cancer and 20 cases o f control group (including 10 cases of benign breast lesions and 10 cases of adj acent breast tissues). In addition, immunohistochemical analyses was used to det ect the expression of P-gp and C-erbB-2 protein in the above mentioned tissu es. Results:The amplification rate of MDR 1 gene and the expre ssion of P-gp protein in breast cancer group was 50.88% (29/57) and 42.11% (24/ 57), which had a significient difference as compared to the control group. The a mplification of MDR 1 gene were higher than the expression of P-gp protein ,there was close correlation between them but not complete correspondence.The p ositive rate was 28.07%(16/57) in detecting the overexpression of C-erbB-2 pro tein in breast cancer group, nevertheless, no positive case was found in the con trol group. The expression of MDR 1/P-gp was also correlated with the over expression of C-erbB-2. Conclusions:Multidrug resistance gene1(MDR 1)and protoonco gene C-erbB-2 were co-expressed in breast cancer,and their expression were po sitively related. The expression of above mentioned two genes have a relationshi p with multidrug resistance in breast cancer.

Background:Colonoscopy is considered as a standard method for detecting various kinds of colorectal polyps. However,conventional colonoscopy( CC)still has the chance to miss some lesions. Literatures have already reported that transparent hood assisted colonoscopy( THAC)can improve the detection of colorectal polyps. However,the effect of black hood assisted colonoscopy( BHAC)on detection of colorectal polyps is still unclear. Aims:To evaluate the effect of BHAC on detection of colorectal polyps. Methods:A total of 1 076 patients underwent CC and BHAC from Sept. 2014 to April 2015 at Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled study. Baseline characteristics,cecal intubation time,withdrawal time,number of polyps,detection rate of polyps,location, size,morphology and pathological diagnosis of polyps between two groups were compared. Results:Compared with CC group,cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in BHAC group than in CC group[(6. 31 ± 3. 51)min vs.(7. 05 ± 4. 15)min,P=0. 002]. No significant differences in withdrawal time and rate of cecal intubation were found between two groups(P>0. 05). Detection rate of polyps was significantly higher in BHAC group than in CC group(65. 4% vs. 48. 7%,P=0. 004). No significant differences in size,morphology of polyps were found between two groups(P>0. 05). Conclusions:Compared with CC,BHAC could significantly improve the detection of colorectal polyps,and shorten cecal intubation time.

Objective To determine risk factors for the miss rate of colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy.Methods A total of 981 patients,diagnosed as having at least one polyp in colonoscopy,received a second colonoscopy in 6 months from November 2012 to March 2016.All polyps were removed in the second colonoscopy.Bio-information of patients such as sex,age,surveillance interval and features of polyps such as number,size,shape,location,pathology,withdrawal time,bowel preparation was retrospectively analyzed.Factors associated with the miss rates in these patients were analyzed with Chisquare and was also analyzed with Logistic regression model for multiple factors.Results A total of 981 patients were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,including 604 males and 377 females.Miss rates of males and females were 38.9％ (235/604) and 27.9％ (105/377) (P＜0.01)respectively.Age ranged from 25 to 87 years with mean age being 61.0±9.7 years.Miss rates of senior patients ＜65 and ≥65 years were 31.5％(195/619) and 40.1％(145/362) respectively (P＜0.01).A total of 1 728 adenomas were found in first colonoscopy.A total of 2 267 adenomas were found in the second colonoscopy.The adenoma miss rate was 23.8％ (539/2 267).The miss rate of adenoma whose size ≤ 5 mm was 42.5％ (311/732);and that of larger size of 6 to 9 mm was 17.8％ (194/1 090);that of even larger size,i.e.,≥10 mm,was 7.6％(34/445)(P＜0.01).Miss rates of Is,Isp,Ip,LST and Ⅱ adenomas in shape were 28.4％(489/1 720),9.3％(24/235),6.6％ (12/182),9.0％(6/67) 20.5％ (8/39) respectively (P＞0.05).Location with highest adenoma miss rate were descending colon,ascending colon and transverse colon,27.8％(64/230),25.5％(120/470),25.5％ (161/632) respectively.Miss rates of high and low risk adenoma were 44.8％ (277/618) and 17.4％ (63/363) (P＜0.01).The highest adenoma miss rate of all the pathology type was tubular adenoma.The adenoma miss rate was 26.9％ (449/1 671) (P＜0.01).Miss rates of good and poor bowel preparation were 30.2％ (271/897) and 82.1％ (69/84) (P＜0.01).Miss rates of adequate and inadequate withdrawal time were 24.3％ (174/717) and 62.9％ (166/264) (P＜0.01).Conclusion Male,old-age,diameter ≤ 5 mm,poor bowel preparation and inadequate withdrawal time,high risk adenoma are the risk factors for missed adenoma.But the shape and location of adenoma are not the risk factors.

Objective To investigate the risk factors of pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen from gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 235 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgical resection and diagnosed as LGIN or EGC ( including high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia) by postoperative pathology. Patients were grouped by whether there was significant pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the risk factors for significant pathological discrepancy. Results Significant pathological discrepancy occurred in 33 cases (14. 0%). Univariate analysis showed that protruding lesion, non-reddish surface, without erosion or ulcer, diffused pathological type and number of biopsy were related to the pathological discrepancy (all P＜0. 05). Multivariate analysis suggested that small number of biopsy blocks (OR＝0. 574, 95%CI: 0. 363-0. 908, P＝0. 018) was an independent risk factor for significant pathological discrepancy. Conclusion The pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen from gastric LGIN and EGC are common. Multiple biopsies can improve the accuracy of biopsy and reduce the occurrence of pathological discrepancy with excisional specimen.