1.Innovative Application of Information Technology in Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization Construction
Ji MA ; Mengyuan WANG ; Rong WANG ; Renghai LIU
World Science and Technology-Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2016;18(7):1113-1120
With the boom of modern science and technology,traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has hardly converged on the surge.As a result,modern Chinese medicine has to press ahead with the reform and innovation of informatization for better inheritence and promotion of the essential of Chinese culture.In July,2012,the State Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration published the Twelfth Five Year Plan for Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization Construction,pointing out a new direction for the practitioners and institutions of Chinese medicine and bringing them both opportunities and challenges.Modern Chinese medicine should be more concerned with the integration of advanced information technology,mathematics,physics and other related disciplines for its pioneering innovation in the specific applications,such as the TCM objective treatments,informatization construction and education in TCM,and Chinese medicine database and digital publishing modes.
2.Clinical study of modified seton treatment on high anal fistulas by multicenter, randomized,single blind method
Liang YUAN ; Yuming KOU ; Guodong LI ; Fei WANG ; Renghai LIU ; Shuxin ZHANG
International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2013;(7):593-596
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standardized seton therapy combined with the counterparts drainage improved surgical approach on the treatment of high anal fistula,and to form the technical specifications and application programs.Methods 120 patients of high anal fistula (simple and complex) from three centers were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group,60 cases in each group.SPSS 16.0 was used to make a statistical analysis on actual enrolled patients,fall off and excluded patients.Demographics,distribution of cases and baseline data were also compared between the two groups to determine the efficacy and safety.The treatment group was treated with a modified hanging line with their counterpart drainage; while the control group was treated with traditional low cut high hanging line method.The length of healing time,hung off times,healing time,postoperative pain,anal and manometry were observed in both groups.Results Among 120 cases,118 eases were effective and 2 eases excluded off Healing time of the treatment group (29.87±3.93)d was less than the control group(35.32±8.61)d,P<0.05.Hang off time of the treatment group (13.73±3.15)d was less than the control group (14.98±6.84) d,P<0.05.Although the postoperative pain scores of the treatment group was lower than the control group,but with not statistical significance.Anal manometry was within the normal range,and anal function was not affected.Conclusion The quantitative hung up with the improved counterparts drainage surgical methods were safe and effective in the treatment of high anal fistula.