Objective The aim of this study was to determine the content of phthalate in disposable plastic tableware sold on Chengdu market,and to provide primary data for safety evaluation.Methods Sample selection was based on stratified sampling.Sixteen phthalate compounds were investigated in 60 disposable plastic tableware,divided into seven groups.The analysis was performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).Results In this survey,diethyl phthalate,diisobutyl phthalate,dibutyl phthalate and diethylhexyl phthalate were detected,while the other 12 phthalate compound were not.The positive rates of the four detected phthalate were 6.7％ (4/60),10.0％ (6/60),46.7％ (28/60) and 28.3％ (17/60) respectively,and the highest concentrations were 10.3,6.4,7.2 and 65.6 mg/kg,respectively.Conclusion The observed level of detection rates and maximum concentrations were relatively high in this survey.In addition,some subgroups of PAEs that were not allowed to use in food contact materials were detected.Therefore,the migration in different food simulant would be analyzed in the next step for further health outcome assessment.

Objective To investigate the detection and significance of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin B (INHB) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods This study randomly selected 240 PCOS patients from January to October 2018 in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, and 240 healthy women who were admitted to the physical examination center of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University as control group during the same period. Retrospective study was adopted. Serum samples of patients were collected and the serum estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), AMH and INHB were detected. The data were analyzed by single sample Kolmogorov-Smimov test, independent sample T test and logistic regression analysis. Results The detection values of AMH, INHB, E2, LH, FSH, T, SHBG and INHB/AMH in PCOS group were (8.55±3.17) ng/ml, (101.7±15.2) pg/ml, (63± 50) pg/ml, (13.0±5.8) mIU/ml, (6.5±1.5) mIU/ml, (0.68±0.23) ng/ml, (62±52) nmol/ml and (24.03±26.35) respectively. In the control group, the detection values of AMH, INHB, E2, LH, FSH, T, SHBG, INHB and AMH were (4.34±2.07) ng/ml, (83.3±7.7) pg/ml, (66±25) pg/ml, (7.1±3.7) mIU/ml, (7.2±1.9) mIU/ml, (0.40± 0.11) ng/ml, (67±37) nmol/ml and (42.83±62.22). The detection values of AMH, INHB, LH, T and SHBG in PCOS group were higher than those in control group (the t values were 9.843, 7.373, 9.021, 9.349 and 3.867), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The detection values of E2 and FSH in PCOS group were lower than those in control group(the t values were 0.762 and -1.342), with no significant difference (P>0.05). The INHB/AMH value was lower than that in control group(the t value was -2.332), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The area under the curve of AMH, INHB and AMH+INHB in the diagnosis of PCOS was 0.762, 0.677 and 0.789, respectively. The cut-off value of AMH in predicting polycystic ovary syndrome was 6.96 ng/mL, the sensitivity was 61.0％, and the specificity was 82.1％. The cut-off value of INHB in predicting polycystic ovary syndrome was 94.9 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 59.0％ and a specificity of 74.1％. The sensitivity and specificity of combined detection of AMH and INHB in predicting polycystic ovary syndrome were 83.6％ and 60.6％. The positive rates of ultrasound, T, AMH and INHB in PCOS group were 51.25％, 61.25％, 69.58％ and 66.25％, respectively. Conclusion The combined detection of AMH and INHB may improve the sensitivity and specificity of PCOS diagnosis, and its serum level is stable.

To investigate the distribution and diagnostic value of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in healthy women of childbearing age, women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), ovarian dysfunction (DOR) and premature ovarian failure (POF). This study retrospectively selected female patients of childbearing age who were treated in the affiliated Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January to December 2019. According to different clinical manifestations, they were divided into 133 cases in PCOS group, 120 cases in DOR group and 134 cases in POF group. 125 healthy women in the same period were selected as the control group. The values of serum AMH, estradiol (E2), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) were measured in the four groups. Single sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA, independent sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Mann-Whitney U test, logistic regression analysis and ROC curve were used for comparative analysis. The serum AMH levels of PCOS group, DOR group, POF group and control group were 9.10 (6.67, 11.49) ng/ml, 0.11 (0.05, 0.29) ng/ml, 0.03 (0.02, 0.06) ng/ml and 2.99 (1.57, 4.98) ng/ml, respectively [ M(Q1,Q3)], the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.001). The basal endocrine levels including E2, FSH, LH and T also had significant differences between groups ( P<0.001). The results of multiple comparisons showed that there were significant differences in AMH and LH between DOR, POF and PCOS groups and the control group. The T level of PCOS group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the E2, LH and T levels of DOR group were significantly higher than that of the control group, and the FSH level of POF group was significantly higher than that of the control group ( P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of AMH and AMH+LH in the diagnosis of PCOS were 0.905 and 0.922, the sensitivity was 82.7% and 85.0%, and the specificity was 88.0% and 88.8%. The AUC of DOR was 0.861 and 0.971, the sensitivity was 89.0% and 92.5%, and the specificity was 63.0% and 92.0%. The AUC of POF was 0.950 and 0.998, the sensitivity was 98.3% and 99.2%, and the specificity was 75.9% and 97.0%, respectively. The AUC of AMH and AMH+LH combined indexes in the differential diagnosis of DOR and POF were 0.768 and 0.937, the sensitivity was 70.3% and 95.5%, and the specificity was 73.9% and 80.8%.

To investigate the distribution and diagnostic value of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in healthy women of childbearing age, women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), ovarian dysfunction (DOR) and premature ovarian failure (POF). This study retrospectively selected female patients of childbearing age who were treated in the affiliated Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January to December 2019. According to different clinical manifestations, they were divided into 133 cases in PCOS group, 120 cases in DOR group and 134 cases in POF group. 125 healthy women in the same period were selected as the control group. The values of serum AMH, estradiol (E2), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) were measured in the four groups. Single sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA, independent sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Mann-Whitney U test, logistic regression analysis and ROC curve were used for comparative analysis. The serum AMH levels of PCOS group, DOR group, POF group and control group were 9.10 (6.67, 11.49) ng/ml, 0.11 (0.05, 0.29) ng/ml, 0.03 (0.02, 0.06) ng/ml and 2.99 (1.57, 4.98) ng/ml, respectively [ M(Q1,Q3)], the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.001). The basal endocrine levels including E2, FSH, LH and T also had significant differences between groups ( P<0.001). The results of multiple comparisons showed that there were significant differences in AMH and LH between DOR, POF and PCOS groups and the control group. The T level of PCOS group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the E2, LH and T levels of DOR group were significantly higher than that of the control group, and the FSH level of POF group was significantly higher than that of the control group ( P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of AMH and AMH+LH in the diagnosis of PCOS were 0.905 and 0.922, the sensitivity was 82.7% and 85.0%, and the specificity was 88.0% and 88.8%. The AUC of DOR was 0.861 and 0.971, the sensitivity was 89.0% and 92.5%, and the specificity was 63.0% and 92.0%. The AUC of POF was 0.950 and 0.998, the sensitivity was 98.3% and 99.2%, and the specificity was 75.9% and 97.0%, respectively. The AUC of AMH and AMH+LH combined indexes in the differential diagnosis of DOR and POF were 0.768 and 0.937, the sensitivity was 70.3% and 95.5%, and the specificity was 73.9% and 80.8%.