No abstract available.
Prostatectomy*

No abstract available.
Hyperplasia* ; Prostate* ; Prostatectomy*

No abstract available.
Prostatectomy* ; Prostatic Hyperplasia

No abstract available.
Prostate* ; Prostatectomy* ; Prostatic Neoplasms*

No abstract available.
Prostate* ; Prostatectomy* ; Prostatic Neoplasms*

No abstract available.
Prostatectomy* ; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia*

No abstract available.
Prostatectomy* ; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia*

Objectives: to investigate the effectiveness and reliability of the combination of optical cystolithotripsy (OC) and transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) for the treatment of bladder calculi and obstructive benign prostates enlargement (BPE). Patients and methods: from September 1999 to December 2003, 63 patients who had bladder stones and BPE were treated with combined OC and TURP; 45 patients who had bladder stones with no infravesical obstruction were treated with OC alone. In the same period, the records of random selection of 561 patients with BPE were treated by TURP. The operative duration time, the length of hospital stay, the duration of urethral catheterization, outcome and complication of the procedures for each patient were reviewed. Results: The mean duration of surgery were significantly longer with combined OC and TURP than with OC or TURP alone (p<0.05), but not of hospital stay and urethral catheterization. Stones free rates were 100% after OC alone and combined OC and TURP. The postoperative average mean peak flow rates were 13.2 ml/s in the combined OC and TURP group and were 13.7 in the TURP alone group. The complication rates were 13.6% for the TURP procedure, 5% for the OC alone and 21% for the combined OC and TURP (p<0.05). Conclusion: Simultaneous treatment with OC and TURP did not change the effectiveness of these procedures, but caused additional morbidity.
Prostatectomy ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Objective: To investigate the application of a simplified technique for reconstruction of vesicourethral support (RVUS) in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: From January 2017 to August 2019, 122 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal LRP, 65 with RVUS (the RVUS group) and 57 without RVUS (the non-RVUS group). We compared the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of pelvic lymph node dissection, neurovascular bundle sparing, incidence of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage (UVAUL), postoperative urinary continence, postoperative hospital stay, intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time, and urethral catheter removal time between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of pelvic lymph node dissection, neurovascular bundle sparing, or urethral catheter removal time (P > 0.05). The incidence rate of UVAUL was lower in the non-RVUS than in the RVUS group (8.8% vs 0%, P < 0.05), and so were the rates of postoperative urinary continence immediate after (0% vs 32.3%, P < 0.05) and at 1 month (38.6% vs 56.9%, P < 0.05), 3 months (59.6% vs 80%, P < 0.05), 6 months (78.9% vs 84.6%, P > 0.05) and 12 months after catheter removal (87.7% vs 92.3%, P > 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay was dramatically longer in the non-RVUS than in the RVUS group (［9.1 ± 4.3］ vs ［6.7 ± 1.8］ d, P < 0.01) and so was the intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time (［6.9 ± 4.5］ vs ［4.8 ± 1.5］ d, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The simplified technique for reconstruction of vesicourethral support in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy improves early urinary continence, especially immediate continence, decreases the incidence rate of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage, and shortens the intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time and postoperative hospital stay.?
Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Prostatectomy

No abstract available.
Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Hyperplasia