Actinomycosis is a chronic granulomatous suppurative infection caused by anaerobic bacteria from genus Actinomyces which are normal flora of mouth, colon and vagina. Actinomycosis of upper extremity is rare. We report a case of actinomycosis of the distal phalanx of finger many years after flap reconstruction. The patient presented with two months’ history of chronic discharging sinus from the tip of his right index finger, which had sustained a degloving injury 20 years previously. It had been treated with an anterior chest wall flap which had healed uneventfully but was bulky due to excess tissue from the donor site. Radiograph revealed osetomyelitis changes of distal phalanx. Debulking surgery with curettage of the distal phalanx was done. Wound healing was uneventful. He was treated with six weeks of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin. The discharge from the distal phalanx cultured actinomycosis odontolyticus. Histopathology of the debrided tissue showed chronic inflammation. As far as we are aware, there are no reports of actinomycosis in a flap involving the finger treated previously with a chest wall skin flap. The infection was probably dormant for many years before manifesting as a discharging sinus. Although the finger flap was bulky, it was not problematic until it started to have serous discharge. With a thorough debridement of all infected tissue, six weeks of antibiotic was adequate. Ciprofloxacin was prescribed based on discharge culture sensitivity. Metronidazole was added as actinomycosis is anaerobic. Response was prompt as patient was not immunocompromised. At follow-up six months post-surgery the finger had recovered with good function. If not for the discharging sinus, patient would probably have tolerated his bulky finger for the rest of his life.

Background: Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performed using iAssist with the conventional instrumented (CIN) TKA in terms of functional and radiological outcomes. Methods: A total of 100 knees operated for TKA by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively for a period of 2 years. Weightbearing postoperative radiographs of the knees along with scanograms of the lower limbs were used for measurements of component positioning, mechanical axis alignment, and number of outliers. Oxford knee scoring was used for functional analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference was seen in the mean mechanical axis alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal alignment (α and β angles) and sagittal alignment (γ and δ angles) of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups. Though the percentage of outliers for mechanical axis alignment was lower in the PNA-TKA group than in the CIN-TKA group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). The number of outliers for the femoral and tibial component positioning in coronal and sagittal planes was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the two groups with respect to the Oxford Knee Score. The mean surgical time was greater in the PNA-TKA group by 11 minutes, which was statistically significantly longer (p = 0.018). Complications were seen in 6.89% of the cases in the CIN-TKA group, while none in the PNA-TKA group. Conclusions The accurate mechanical axis alignment and component positioning can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation, so the use of PNA system, which adds to the surgical cost, is questionable. Also, equally good short-term functional outcome can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation. The surgeon must be accustomed with the instrumentation of the PNA system, or it adds to the surgical time.

Background: Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performed using iAssist with the conventional instrumented (CIN) TKA in terms of functional and radiological outcomes. Methods: A total of 100 knees operated for TKA by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively for a period of 2 years. Weightbearing postoperative radiographs of the knees along with scanograms of the lower limbs were used for measurements of component positioning, mechanical axis alignment, and number of outliers. Oxford knee scoring was used for functional analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference was seen in the mean mechanical axis alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal alignment (α and β angles) and sagittal alignment (γ and δ angles) of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups. Though the percentage of outliers for mechanical axis alignment was lower in the PNA-TKA group than in the CIN-TKA group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). The number of outliers for the femoral and tibial component positioning in coronal and sagittal planes was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the two groups with respect to the Oxford Knee Score. The mean surgical time was greater in the PNA-TKA group by 11 minutes, which was statistically significantly longer (p = 0.018). Complications were seen in 6.89% of the cases in the CIN-TKA group, while none in the PNA-TKA group. Conclusions The accurate mechanical axis alignment and component positioning can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation, so the use of PNA system, which adds to the surgical cost, is questionable. Also, equally good short-term functional outcome can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation. The surgeon must be accustomed with the instrumentation of the PNA system, or it adds to the surgical time.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric biomechanical study. PURPOSE: We compared the “skipped segment screw” (SSS) construct with the conventional “all segment screw” (ASS) construct for cervical spine fixation in six degrees of freedom in terms of the range of motion (ROM). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Currently, no clear guidelines are available in the literature for the configuration of lateral mass (LM) screwrod fixation for cervical spine stabilization. Most surgeons tend to insert screws bilaterally at all segments from C3 to C6 with the assumption that implants at every level will provide maximum stability. METHODS: Six porcine cervical spine specimens were harvested from fresh 6–9-month-old pigs. Each specimen was sequentially tested in the following order: intact uninstrumented (UIS), SSS (LM screws in C3, C5, and C7 bilaterally), and ASS (LM screws in C3–C7 bilaterally). Biomechanical testing was performed with a force of 2 Nm in six degrees of freedom and 3D motion tracking was performed. RESULTS: The two-tailed paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. There was a significant decrease in ROM in instrumented specimens compared with that in UIS specimens in all six degrees of motion (p<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in ROM between the different types of constructs (SSS and ASS). CONCLUSIONS: Because both configurations provide comparable stability under physiological loading, we provide a biomechanical basis for the use of SSS configuration owing to its potential clinical advantages, such as relatively less bulk of implants within a small operative field, relative ease of manipulating the rod into position, shorter surgical time, less blood loss, lower risk of screw-related complications, less implant-related costs, and most importantly, no compromise in the required stability needed until fusion.
Cadaver ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Equidae ; Female ; Freedom ; Laminectomy ; Operative Time ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Spine* ; Surgeons ; Swine

Objectives: To investigate trends of osteoporosis treatment rates, and factors affecting osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture admission within a single health care system in Hawaii. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients aged 50 years or older and hospitalized for hip fractures between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019 at Hawaii Pacific Health, a large health care system in Hawaii. We collected data on basic demographics and osteoporosis medication prescription from electronic medical records. We evaluated trends of osteoporosis treatment rates and performed logistic regression to determine factors associated with osteoporosis treatment. Results: The mean for treatment rates for osteoporosis from 2011 to 2019 was 17.2% (range 8.8%-26.0%). From 2011 to 2019 there was a small increase in treatment rates from 16.3% in 2011 to 24.1% in 2019. Men were less likely to receive osteoporosis treatment after admission for hip fracture. Patients discharged to a facility were more likely to receive osteoporosis treatment. As compared to women, men who had a hip fracture were less likely to receive dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, and osteoporosis medication before hip fracture admission. Conclusions The use of osteoporosis medication for secondary prevention after admission for hip fracture in Hawaii from 2011 to 2019 was low. However, there was a small increase in treatment rates from 2011 to 2019. Disparities in treatment of osteoporosis after hip fracture were noted in men. Significant work is needed to increase treatment rates further, and to address the disparity in osteoporosis treatment between men and women.

Objectives: To investigate trends of osteoporosis treatment rates, and factors affecting osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture admission within a single health care system in Hawaii. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients aged 50 years or older and hospitalized for hip fractures between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019 at Hawaii Pacific Health, a large health care system in Hawaii. We collected data on basic demographics and osteoporosis medication prescription from electronic medical records. We evaluated trends of osteoporosis treatment rates and performed logistic regression to determine factors associated with osteoporosis treatment. Results: The mean for treatment rates for osteoporosis from 2011 to 2019 was 17.2% (range 8.8%-26.0%). From 2011 to 2019 there was a small increase in treatment rates from 16.3% in 2011 to 24.1% in 2019. Men were less likely to receive osteoporosis treatment after admission for hip fracture. Patients discharged to a facility were more likely to receive osteoporosis treatment. As compared to women, men who had a hip fracture were less likely to receive dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, and osteoporosis medication before hip fracture admission. Conclusions The use of osteoporosis medication for secondary prevention after admission for hip fracture in Hawaii from 2011 to 2019 was low. However, there was a small increase in treatment rates from 2011 to 2019. Disparities in treatment of osteoporosis after hip fracture were noted in men. Significant work is needed to increase treatment rates further, and to address the disparity in osteoporosis treatment between men and women.