1.Significance of the Expression Quantity of HLA-B27 Gene and Its Subtype in Estimating Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Lingdi SUN ; Pingjun WANG ; Yong LU ; Xiaoqian WU ; Xianan SHAO
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine 2016;(1):58-60
Objective To investigate whether expression quantity of HLA-B27 and its subtypes associated with incidence of AS,the gene expression of HLA-B27 and its subtypes were detected in patients with AS.Methods 120 cases patients sus-pected with AS and 50 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study.Main demographic and clinical characteristics of the sub-jects were collected.Meanwhile total RNA was isolated from peripheral blood and real time RT-PCR was used to measure the quantitative expression of HLA-B27 gene.Besides RT-PCR,sequence-based typing (SBT)method was used to confirm the HLA-B27 subtype.All experimental data were analyzed by SPSS17.0 software and P values <0.05 were considered to be significant.Results Firstly,there were 55 subjects were finally diagnosed as AS patients among the 120 patients suspec-ted with AS.There were 53 subjects whose HLA-B27 was positive (96.36%)in 55 patients with AS.It showed that there was a correlation between BASDAI and expression quantity of HLA-B27 gene (r=0.845,P =0.000).Five subtypes were found and which were HLA-B27∶04 subtype (29/53,54.72%),HLA-B27:05 subtype (20/53,37.74%),HLA-B27 ∶02 subtype (2/53,3.77%),HLA-B27∶03 subtype (1/53,1.89%)and HLA-B27∶07 subtype (1/53,1.89%),respectively. Among the 50 healthy subjects,there were only one kind of subtype (2/50,4%),which was HLA-B27∶04.There were no statistical difference in the age (t=0.711,P =0.480),sex (χ2 =0.880,P =0.348),family history (χ2 =0.011,P =0.916) and treatment (χ2 =0.113,P =0.736)between the HLA-B27∶04 and HLA-B27∶05 subtypes.Conclusion HLA-B27∶04 and HLA-B27∶05 were primary subtypes in AS patients which HLA-B27 positive.There was a correlation between gene expression quantity of HLA-B27 and AS disease activity index.
2.Comparison Analysis of HLA-B27 Detected by PCR-SBT and IMS-ELISA in AS Patients
Lingdi SUN ; Chuanzhong MEI ; Pingjun WANG ; Xiaoqian WU ; Xianan SHAO
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine 2015;(2):16-18
Objective To compare PCR-SBT to IMS-ELISA in the HLA-B27 detection in the ankylosing spondylitis (AS)pa-tients.Methods Simultaneously,PCR-SBT and IMS-ELISA were used to detect the HLA-B27 expression in peripheral blood samples which were suspected patients with AS from 120 cases.Chisquare test of paired design and the area under curve of receiver operating characteristics of SPSS17.0 software were used to evaluate the value of PCR-SBT and IMS-ELISA in HLA-B27 detection of AS patients.Results Among 120 cases of suspected patients with AS,the positive rates of HLA-B27 detected by PCR-SBT and IMS-ELISA were 45.83%(55/120)and 37.50% (45/120),respectively.There was statistical difference between the two methods in the HLA-B27 detection (χ2 =59.455,P =0.000).The sensibility and spe-cificity of PCR-SBT were 96.36% and 96.92%,respectively.While the sensibility and the specificity of IMS-ELISA were 69.09% and 89.23%,respectively.Area under the curve of two methods were 0.966 and 0.792,respectively.Conclusion In comparison with IMS-ELISA,the sensibility and the specificity of PCR-SBT in HLA-B27 detection were higher in AS diag-nosis,that is to say,PCR-SBT is better in HLA-B27 detection and AS diagnosis.
3.Effects of triptolide on radiosensitization of lung cancer A549 cells
Xiate ZHOU ; Haihua YANG ; Wei WANG ; Pingjun GU ; Wei FENG
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2021;28(10):1481-1485
Objective:To investigate the effects of triptolide on radiosensitization of lung cancer A549 cells and the underlying mechanism.Methods:During June-September 2019, lung cancer A549 cells were treated with different concentrations of triptolide for 24 and 48 hours in Animal Experiment Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China. The inhibitory effects of triptolide on the proliferation of lung cancer A549 cells were determined using MTT method. Appropriate concentrations of triptolide and double distilled water were added to the experimental and control groups, respectively. The effects of triptolide on radiosensitization of lung cancer A549 cells was determined by colony formation assay. Radiosensitization ratio was calculated. Lung cancer A549 cells were divided into blank control, triptolide, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + triptolide groups. The effects of triptolide on apoptosis and cell cycle of lung cancer A549 cells were determined by flow cytometry.Results:The 10% inhibitory concentration (IC 10) and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50) of triptolide for treating lung cancer A549 cells were 36.61 nmol/L and 259.38 nmol/L, respectively at 24 hours, and they were 9.05 nmol/L and 61.49 nmol/L, respectively at 48 hours. Triptolide had an radiosensitization effect on lung cancer A549 cells, with the radiosensitization ratio of 1.135. The apoptosis rate in the radiotherapy + triptolide group was significantly higher than that in the radiotherapy [(45.47 ± 8.29)% vs. (5.25 ± 0.59)%, t = 6.847, P = 0.002]. The proportion of lung cancer A549 cells at the G2/M phase in the radiotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the radiotherapy + triptolide group [(27.82 ± 0.96)% vs. (11.98 ± 0.55)%, t = 20.176, P < 0.05]. The proportion of lung cancer A549 cells at the G2/M phase in the black group was significantly higher than that in the triptolide group [(17.31 ± 3.42)% vs. (8.05 ± 0.71)%, t = 3.749, P = 0.02]. Conclusion:Triptolide has a radiosensitization effect on lung cancer A549 cells, and the underlying mechanism may be related to its participation in cell apoptosis and cycle regulation.
4.Effects of interIeukin-6 on mitochondriaI biogenesis in activated astrocytes and its mechanism
Xiaolan CHEN ; Yang WANG ; Tiannan ZHANG ; Pingjun WANG ; Jinda HUANG ; Xinxin CHEN ; Qiyi ZENG
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics 2019;34(3):213-217
Objective To invkstigatk thk kffkcts of intkrlkucin-6(IF-6)on mitochondrial biogknksis in ac-tivatkd astrocetks(LS)and thk rolk of adknosink monophosphatk protkin cinask( LMPK)in this prockss. Methods Thk LS isolatkd from nkonatal rat ckrkbral codkx wkrk purifikd and culturkd. Thk LS was randomle dividkd into 5 groups:control group,lipopolesaccharidk(FPS)+intkrfkron-γ(IPN-γ)group( IPN-γ group),FPS+IPN-γ+IF-6 group(IF-6 group),FPS+IPN-γ+IF-6A siANL+IF-6 group(siANL group),and FPS+IPN-γ+nkga-tivk control(NC)+IF-6 group(NC group),thkn,LS in kach group was trkatkd for 6 h. Tumor nkcrosis factor-α (TNP-α)mANL and intkrlkucin-1β(IF-1β)mANL kxprkssion wkrk dktkctkd be adopting rkvkrsk transcription-polemkrask chain rkaction(AT-PCA). Thk lkvkls of rkactivk oxegkn spkciks(AOS)wkrk dktkctkd be fluorksknt probk mkthod and thk lkvkls of adknosink triphosphatk(LTP)wkrk dktkctkd be lucifkrask mkthod. Ckll viabilite was kvaluatkd be using ckll count Kit-8. Pkroxisomk prolifkrator-activatkd rkckptor gamma coactivator-1α(PGC-1α),nuclkar rk-spiratore factor-1(NAP-1),mitochondrial transcription factor L( TPLM)and phospho-adknosink monophosphatk activatkd protkin cinask(p-LMPK)protkin kxprkssion wkrk dktkctkd be using Zkstkrn blotting. ResuIts (1)Com-parkd with thk control group,thk mANL kxprkssions of TNP-α and IF-1β(2. 548 ± 0. 154 vs. 1. 000 ± 0. 001,P﹦ 0. 000;2. 912 ± 0. 102 vs. 1. 000 ± 0. 001,P﹦0. 000),thk lkvkls of AOS[(245. 307 ± 13. 379)APR vs.(69. 460 ± 7. 257)APR,P﹦0. 000]and LTP[(1. 558 ± 0. 008)nmol╱mg protkin vs.(1. 016 ± 0. 025)nmol╱mg protkin,P﹦0. 000]significantle klkvatkd,and thk ckll viabilite(0. 840 ± 0. 013 vs. 1. 000 ± 0. 001,P﹦0. 000)dkcrkaskd,whilk thk protkin kxprkssion of NAP-1(0. 406 ± 0. 045 vs. 0. 157 ± 0. 016,P﹦0. 017),TPLM(0. 605 ± 0. 025 vs. 0. 416 ± 0. 013,P﹦0. 005)klkvatkd in FPS+IPN-γ group,and thk diffkrkncks wkrk significant(all P<0. 05).(2)Comparkd with FPS+IPN-γ group,thk lkvkls of LTP[(1. 763 ± 0. 028)nmol╱mg protkin vs.(1. 558 ± 0. 008)nmol╱mg pro-tkin,P﹦0. 000],thk ckll viabilite(0. 910 ± 0. 024 vs. 0. 840 ± 0. 013,P﹦0. 008)wkrk klkvatkd,whilk thk protkin kx-prkssion of PGC-1α(0. 724 ± 0. 027 vs. 0. 586 ± 0. 039,P﹦0. 000),NAP-1(1. 036 ± 0. 211 vs. 0. 406 ± 0. 045,P﹦0. 000),TPLM(0. 786 ± 0. 058 vs. 0. 605 ± 0. 025,P﹦0. 002)and p-LMPK(1. 094 ± 0. 223 vs. 0. 755 ± 0. 084,P﹦0. 014)wkrk klkvatkd in IF-6 group,and thk diffkrkncks wkrk significant( all P<0. 05).(3)Comparkd with IF-6 group,LTP[(1. 187 ± 0. 005)nmol╱mg protkin vs.(1. 763 ± 0. 028)nmol╱mg protkin,P﹦0. 000]and thk ckll viabili-te(0. 680 ± 0. 040 vs. 0. 910 ± 0. 024,P ﹦0. 000)all dkcrkaskd in siANL group,whilk thk protkin kxprkssion of PGC-1α(0. 631 ± 0. 022 vs. 0. 724 ± 0. 027,P﹦0. 020),NAP-1(0. 386 ± 0. 066 vs. 1. 036 ± 0. 211,P﹦0. 000), TPLM(0. 593 ± 0. 022 vs. 0. 786 ± 0. 058,P﹦0. 009)and p-LMPK(0. 365 ± 0. 063 vs. 1. 094 ± 0. 223,P﹦0. 002) significantle dkcrkaskd in siANL group,and thk diffkrkncks wkrk significant(all P<0. 05). ConcIusions IF-6 can incrkask mitochondrial biogknksis in activatkd LS,which is probable mkdiatkd through up-rkgulating thk kxprkssion of LMPK.
5.A comparative study on calculation of intraocular lens power using different formulas between IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 in cataract eyes
Xiaohui DENG ; Pingjun CHANG ; Jinhai HUANG ; Dandan WANG ; Yinying ZHAO ; Xixia DING ; Yun'e ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology 2022;40(12):1170-1175
Objective:To compare the accuracy of IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted.Two hundred and sixty-two eyes of 262 patients who underwent phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation at the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from November 2018 to November 2019 were enrolled.Preoperative biometry for cataract surgery was performed using IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500.IOL power was calculated through the built-in formulas, Haigis, Holladay Ⅰ, Hoffer Q and SRK/T of the two devices.The difference in IOL power calculation between the two devices was analyzed through the prediction error of IOL power calculation using different formulas across different axial length (AL) ranges.This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (No.2020-038-K-33). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before the surgery.Results:There was no significant difference in mean absolute error (MAE) between IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 using Haigis, Hoffer Q and SRK/T over the entire AL range (all at P >0.05). The MAE of IOLMaster 500 was 0.47 (0.24, 0.90) D, which was significantly lower than 0.50 (0.28, 0.99) D of IOLMaster 700 using Holladay Ⅰ formula ( Z=-3.120, P=0.002). When AL was <22.0 mm and ≥24.5 mm-<26.0 mm, there was no significant difference in MAE between the two devices using the four formulas (all at P >0.05). When AL was ≥22.0 mm-24.5 mm, there was no significant difference in the MAE between the two devices using Haigis, Hoffer Q and SRK/T (all at P >0.05), but 0.42 (0.18, 0.75) D from IOLMaster 500 was smaller than 0.45 (0.25, 0.79) D from IOLMaster 700 using Holladay Ⅰ, showing a statistically significant difference ( Z=-3.487, P <0.001). But the difference was negligible and therefore was of no clinical significance.When AL was ≥26.0 mm, there was no statistically significant difference in the MAE between the two devices using Haigis, Holladay Ⅰ and SRK/T, but 0.66 (0.38, 1.00) D from IOLMaster 500 was significantly smaller than 0.98 (0.62, 1.32) D from IOLMaster 700 using Hoffer Q ( Z=-3.046, P=0.002). Conclusions:The refractive prediction accuracy of IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 using Haigis, Hoffer Q and SRK/T is similar over the entire AL range.For patient with long AL, the IOL calculation from IOLMaster 700 using Hoffer Q is significantly larger than that from IOLMaster 500, which requires extra caution in clinical practice.The accuracy of IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 for IOL prediction is very similar.