1.American cutaneous leishmaniasis in children and adolescents from Northcentral Venezuela.
Olinda Delgado ; Sylvia Silva ; Virginia Coraspe ; Maria A Ribas ; Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales ; Pedro Navarro ; Carlos Franco-Paredes
Tropical biomedicine 2008;25(3):178-83
American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL) comprises a broad range of cutaneous manifestations caused by different Leishmania species which may produce severe and chronic sequelae in adults. However, it has been suggested that ACL may show different clinical and epidemiological features in children and adolescents that need to be further elucidated. We evaluated the epidemiological features of ACL in a cohort of pediatric patients from Northcentral Venezuela between years 1997 and 2005. Mean age of patients was 9 years old, with a mean clinical evolution of 3 months. Lesions were located mostly in extremities. Forty patients (93%) were positive by MST, 97.7% by IFAT and 48.8% by smear. MST values tended to be related to patients' age, higher values being recorded in older patients (p=0.153).
Adjective Check List
;
Venezuela
;
Child
;
MST
;
Clinical
2.A prospective analysis of factors that influence weight loss in patients undergoing radiotherapy.
Jon CACICEDO ; Francisco CASQUERO ; Lorea MARTINEZ-INDART ; Olga del HOYO ; Arturo NAVARRO ; Pedro BILBAO
Chinese Journal of Cancer 2014;33(4):204-210
Malnutrition occurs frequently in patients with cancer. Indeed, a variety of nutritional and tumor-related factors must be taken into account in these patients. Recognizing this relationship, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the risk factors that influence weight loss in patients undergoing radiotherapy with oral nutritional supplementation and dietetic counseling. Weight loss of 74 patients during radiotherapy and 1 month after treatment was analyzed. Parameters such as age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, and the use of chemotherapy were analyzed to evaluate their influence on weight loss. All patients underwent oral nutritional supplementation and dietetic counseling. Forty-six (65.7%) patients lost weight, with a mean weight loss of (4.73 ± 3.91) kg, during radiotherapy. At 1 month after treatment, 45 (66.2%) patients lost weight, presenting a mean weight loss of (4.96 ± 4.04) kg, corresponding to a (6.84 ± 5.24)% net reduction from their baseline weight. Head and neck cancer patients had a mean weight loss of (3.25 ± 5.30) kg, whereas the remaining patients had a mean weight loss of (0.64 ± 2.39) kg (P = 0.028) during radiotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, the head and neck tumor location (P = 0.005), use of chemotherapy (P = 0.011), and ECOG PS score of 2-3 (P = 0.026) were considered independent risk factors. Nutritional status and parameters, such as tumor location (especially the head and neck), the use of chemotherapy, and the ECOG PS score, should be evaluated before radiotherapy because these factors can influence weight loss during radiotherapy and 1 month after treatment.
Body Weight
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms
;
radiotherapy
;
Humans
;
Neoplasms
;
radiotherapy
;
Prospective Studies
;
Radiotherapy
;
adverse effects
;
Risk Factors
;
Weight Loss
3.Older Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: Which Patients should be Selected for a Different Approach?
Nere Larrea AGUIRRE ; Susana García GUTIÉRREZ ; Oscar MIRO ; Sira AGUILÓ ; Javier JACOB ; Aitor ALQUÉZAR-ARBÉ ; Guillermo BURILLO ; Cesáreo FERNANDEZ ; Pere LLORENS ; Cesar Roza ALONSO ; Ivana Tavasci LOPEZ ; Mónica CAÑETE ; Pedro Ruiz ASENSIO ; Beatriz Paderne DÍAZ ; Teresa Pablos PIZARRO ; Rigoberto Jesús del Rio NAVARRO ; Núria Perelló VIOLA ; Lourdes HERNÁNDEZ-CASTELLS ; Alejandro Cortés SOLER ; Elena SÁNCHEZ FERNÁNDEZ-LINARES ; Jesús Ángel Sánchez SERRANO ; Patxi EZPONDA ; Andrea Martínez LORENZO ; Juan Vicente Ortega LIARTE ; Susana Sánchez RAMÓN ; Asumpta Ruiz ARANDA ; Francisco Javier MARTÍN-SÁNCHEZ ; Juan González DEL CASTILLO ;
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2024;28(1):9-19
Background:
While multidimensional and interdisciplinary assessment of older adult patients improves their short-term outcomes after evaluation in the emergency department (ED), this assessment is time-consuming and ill-suited for the busy environment. Thus, identifying patients who will benefit from this strategy is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to identify older adult patients suitable for a different ED approach as well as independent variables associated with poor short-term clinical outcomes.
Methods:
We included all patients ≥65 years attending 52 EDs in Spain over 7 days. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, and baseline functional status data were collected. The outcomes were 30-day mortality, re-presentation, hospital readmission, and the composite of all outcomes.
Results:
During the study among 96,014 patients evaluated in the ED, we included 23,338 patients ≥65 years—mean age, 78.4±8.1 years; 12,626 (54.1%) women. During follow-up, 5,776 patients (24.75%) had poor outcomes after evaluation in the ED: 1,140 (4.88%) died, 4,640 (20.51) returned to the ED, and 1,739 (7.69%) were readmitted 30 days after discharge following the index visit. A model including male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3, and functional impairment had a C-index of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.82) for 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
Male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, functional impairment, or severe comorbidity are features of patients who could benefit from approaches in the ED different from the common triage to improve the poor short-term outcomes of this population.
4.Older Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: Which Patients should be Selected for a Different Approach?
Nere Larrea AGUIRRE ; Susana García GUTIÉRREZ ; Oscar MIRO ; Sira AGUILÓ ; Javier JACOB ; Aitor ALQUÉZAR-ARBÉ ; Guillermo BURILLO ; Cesáreo FERNANDEZ ; Pere LLORENS ; Cesar Roza ALONSO ; Ivana Tavasci LOPEZ ; Mónica CAÑETE ; Pedro Ruiz ASENSIO ; Beatriz Paderne DÍAZ ; Teresa Pablos PIZARRO ; Rigoberto Jesús del Rio NAVARRO ; Núria Perelló VIOLA ; Lourdes HERNÁNDEZ-CASTELLS ; Alejandro Cortés SOLER ; Elena SÁNCHEZ FERNÁNDEZ-LINARES ; Jesús Ángel Sánchez SERRANO ; Patxi EZPONDA ; Andrea Martínez LORENZO ; Juan Vicente Ortega LIARTE ; Susana Sánchez RAMÓN ; Asumpta Ruiz ARANDA ; Francisco Javier MARTÍN-SÁNCHEZ ; Juan González DEL CASTILLO ;
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2024;28(1):9-19
Background:
While multidimensional and interdisciplinary assessment of older adult patients improves their short-term outcomes after evaluation in the emergency department (ED), this assessment is time-consuming and ill-suited for the busy environment. Thus, identifying patients who will benefit from this strategy is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to identify older adult patients suitable for a different ED approach as well as independent variables associated with poor short-term clinical outcomes.
Methods:
We included all patients ≥65 years attending 52 EDs in Spain over 7 days. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, and baseline functional status data were collected. The outcomes were 30-day mortality, re-presentation, hospital readmission, and the composite of all outcomes.
Results:
During the study among 96,014 patients evaluated in the ED, we included 23,338 patients ≥65 years—mean age, 78.4±8.1 years; 12,626 (54.1%) women. During follow-up, 5,776 patients (24.75%) had poor outcomes after evaluation in the ED: 1,140 (4.88%) died, 4,640 (20.51) returned to the ED, and 1,739 (7.69%) were readmitted 30 days after discharge following the index visit. A model including male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3, and functional impairment had a C-index of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.82) for 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
Male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, functional impairment, or severe comorbidity are features of patients who could benefit from approaches in the ED different from the common triage to improve the poor short-term outcomes of this population.
5.Older Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: Which Patients should be Selected for a Different Approach?
Nere Larrea AGUIRRE ; Susana García GUTIÉRREZ ; Oscar MIRO ; Sira AGUILÓ ; Javier JACOB ; Aitor ALQUÉZAR-ARBÉ ; Guillermo BURILLO ; Cesáreo FERNANDEZ ; Pere LLORENS ; Cesar Roza ALONSO ; Ivana Tavasci LOPEZ ; Mónica CAÑETE ; Pedro Ruiz ASENSIO ; Beatriz Paderne DÍAZ ; Teresa Pablos PIZARRO ; Rigoberto Jesús del Rio NAVARRO ; Núria Perelló VIOLA ; Lourdes HERNÁNDEZ-CASTELLS ; Alejandro Cortés SOLER ; Elena SÁNCHEZ FERNÁNDEZ-LINARES ; Jesús Ángel Sánchez SERRANO ; Patxi EZPONDA ; Andrea Martínez LORENZO ; Juan Vicente Ortega LIARTE ; Susana Sánchez RAMÓN ; Asumpta Ruiz ARANDA ; Francisco Javier MARTÍN-SÁNCHEZ ; Juan González DEL CASTILLO ;
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2024;28(1):9-19
Background:
While multidimensional and interdisciplinary assessment of older adult patients improves their short-term outcomes after evaluation in the emergency department (ED), this assessment is time-consuming and ill-suited for the busy environment. Thus, identifying patients who will benefit from this strategy is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to identify older adult patients suitable for a different ED approach as well as independent variables associated with poor short-term clinical outcomes.
Methods:
We included all patients ≥65 years attending 52 EDs in Spain over 7 days. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, and baseline functional status data were collected. The outcomes were 30-day mortality, re-presentation, hospital readmission, and the composite of all outcomes.
Results:
During the study among 96,014 patients evaluated in the ED, we included 23,338 patients ≥65 years—mean age, 78.4±8.1 years; 12,626 (54.1%) women. During follow-up, 5,776 patients (24.75%) had poor outcomes after evaluation in the ED: 1,140 (4.88%) died, 4,640 (20.51) returned to the ED, and 1,739 (7.69%) were readmitted 30 days after discharge following the index visit. A model including male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3, and functional impairment had a C-index of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.82) for 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
Male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, functional impairment, or severe comorbidity are features of patients who could benefit from approaches in the ED different from the common triage to improve the poor short-term outcomes of this population.
6.Older Adult Patients in the Emergency Department: Which Patients should be Selected for a Different Approach?
Nere Larrea AGUIRRE ; Susana García GUTIÉRREZ ; Oscar MIRO ; Sira AGUILÓ ; Javier JACOB ; Aitor ALQUÉZAR-ARBÉ ; Guillermo BURILLO ; Cesáreo FERNANDEZ ; Pere LLORENS ; Cesar Roza ALONSO ; Ivana Tavasci LOPEZ ; Mónica CAÑETE ; Pedro Ruiz ASENSIO ; Beatriz Paderne DÍAZ ; Teresa Pablos PIZARRO ; Rigoberto Jesús del Rio NAVARRO ; Núria Perelló VIOLA ; Lourdes HERNÁNDEZ-CASTELLS ; Alejandro Cortés SOLER ; Elena SÁNCHEZ FERNÁNDEZ-LINARES ; Jesús Ángel Sánchez SERRANO ; Patxi EZPONDA ; Andrea Martínez LORENZO ; Juan Vicente Ortega LIARTE ; Susana Sánchez RAMÓN ; Asumpta Ruiz ARANDA ; Francisco Javier MARTÍN-SÁNCHEZ ; Juan González DEL CASTILLO ;
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2024;28(1):9-19
Background:
While multidimensional and interdisciplinary assessment of older adult patients improves their short-term outcomes after evaluation in the emergency department (ED), this assessment is time-consuming and ill-suited for the busy environment. Thus, identifying patients who will benefit from this strategy is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to identify older adult patients suitable for a different ED approach as well as independent variables associated with poor short-term clinical outcomes.
Methods:
We included all patients ≥65 years attending 52 EDs in Spain over 7 days. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, and baseline functional status data were collected. The outcomes were 30-day mortality, re-presentation, hospital readmission, and the composite of all outcomes.
Results:
During the study among 96,014 patients evaluated in the ED, we included 23,338 patients ≥65 years—mean age, 78.4±8.1 years; 12,626 (54.1%) women. During follow-up, 5,776 patients (24.75%) had poor outcomes after evaluation in the ED: 1,140 (4.88%) died, 4,640 (20.51) returned to the ED, and 1,739 (7.69%) were readmitted 30 days after discharge following the index visit. A model including male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3, and functional impairment had a C-index of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.82) for 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
Male sex, age ≥75 years, arrival by ambulance, functional impairment, or severe comorbidity are features of patients who could benefit from approaches in the ED different from the common triage to improve the poor short-term outcomes of this population.