1.A case of neovascular glaucoma secondary to ocular ischemia
James Paul S. Gomez ; Amadeo A. Veloso ; Edgar U. Leuenberger
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology 2022;47(2):106-110
Objective:
To present a case of neovascular glaucoma secondary to ocular ischemic syndrome
following an uncomplicated phacoemulsification
Methods:
This is a case description of a 74-year-old male who developed blurred vision and increased
intraocular pressure (IOP) two months after an uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery
with posterior chamber lens implantation of the left eye. There was iris neovascularization with
absence of retinal dot/blot hemorrhages or neovascularization. The fluorescein angiogram (FA)
showed delayed choroidal fluorescence and arteriovenous time. IOP-lowering medications and
intravitreal injection of aflibercept were given. Carotid doppler test showed 70% stenosis of the
ipsilateral artery but a subsequent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) did not show evidence of
significant stenosis.
Results:
At his last consultation, visual acuity improved to counting fingers. IOP was maintained at
12 mmHg with one anti-glaucoma medication.
Conclusion
Ocular ischemia can confound the outcome of an uncomplicated cataract surgery.
Doppler scans are usually chosen as the first-line exam for those suspected of carotid stenosis but, at
times, may have contradictory results with MRA.
Glaucoma, Neovascular
;
Phacoemulsification
2.Workplace incivility among nurses in a national tertiary hospital.
Paul Froilan U. GARMA ; Maria Clarissa C. BRAGANZA ; Jewell Mari Ellaine DAVID ; Marivin Joy LIM ; Michelle DELA CRUZ ; Paul VELOSO
Philippine Journal of Nursing 2018;88(1):3-10
Incivility creates an environment of hostility among healthcare providers in the workplace, and undermines a culture of patient safety. Although this phenomenon is pervasive in the profession, nurses tolerate or ignore its occurrence due to inadequate knowledge, fear and lack of institutional policies. There are no empirical studies in the local context which explore incivility among nurses in the hospital setting. This study examined the sources and forms of incivility among nurses working in a hospital according to nurse-related variables. A descriptive, cross-sectional design was utilized. Respondents were asked to answer Nurse's Profile and Nursing Incivility Scale. A stratified random sampling was used. A sample of 280 nurses from different clinical nursing units in a national tertiary hospital completed the questionnaire. Incivility outcome was analyzed using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) according to nurse-related variables such as nursing designation, practice setting, type of clinical nursing unit and length of hospital work experience. Post-hoc analysis was performed using Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference. Data were collected from September to October 2017.
Majority of the participants are female (78 %) and single (50 %) with an average age of 36 years old (SD= 9.96, range 21-62). They are employed in the hospital for an average of 9 years (SD = 8.82). Most of the sample works in general clinical nursing units (68 %) in a service/ charity setting (57 %). More than half of the respondents are staff nurses (67%) who provide direct care (Nurse I/II) followed by charge nurses (Nurse III) (19%) and head and chief nurses (IV/VI) (13%). Significant in civil interactions were reported between nurses and their colleagues at work, physicians and patients and their families according to the nursing designation, practice setting, type of clinical nursing unit and length of work experience. The moderately in civil interactions were exhibited in the forms of inconsistent behaviors, hostile climate and displaced frustrations. Nurse-related variables have significant impact on in civil interactions in the hospital setting. Understanding the sources and forms of incivility is of paramount importance in mitigating its impact on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes, and developing relevant policies and interventions that protect the welfare of nursing workforce.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Adult (a Person 19-44 Years Of Age) ; Interprofessional Relations ; Incivility
3.Comparison of the clinical profile of patients with glaucoma between private and government clinics in the Philippines.
Edgar Felipe U LEUENBERGER ; James Paul S GOMEZ ; Robert Edward T ANG ; Maria Imelda YAP-VELOSO ; Joseph Anthony J TUMBOCON ; Jose Maria D MARTINEZ ; John Mark S DE LEON ; Nilo Vincent FLORCRUZ ; Rainier Victor A COVAR ; Irene R FELARCA ; Denise Polly CHAO-PO ; Shalam SIAO-MARIANO ; Marie Joan Therese D BALGOS ; Noel D ATIENZA
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology 2019;44(2):45-53
OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with glaucoma managed at private and government institutions in the Philippines between 2009 and 2014.
METHODS: A research team from two private and two government institutions in the Philippines reviewed the case records of 1246 patients seen who met the following criteria: intraocular pressure of >21 mmHg, optic nerve and nerve fiber layer abnormalities, and visual field defects. For bilateral cases, we selected the eye with worse glaucoma parameters.
RESULTS: There were 600 and 646 patients in the private and government groups (mean age at presentation, 60.51 and 55.88 years), respectively, with the majority being Filipino (91%). Patients with visual acuity (VA) of 20/20 to 20/40 were more frequently observed in private centers (58.7% vs. 41.3%), while a VA worse than counting fingers was more frequently observed in government centers (66.1% vs. 33.9%). Within-group analysis showed that primary angle-closure glaucoma was the most frequent glaucoma subtype in both private (27.3%) and government institutions (37.8%). In between-group analysis showed the following to be more common in private than government centers: primary open-angle glaucoma (61.3% vs. 38.7%), normal-tension glaucoma (63.9% vs. 36.1%), ocular hypertension (92.3% vs. 7.7%), and glaucoma suspects (80.4% vs. 19.6%) while government institutions registered a larger number of primary angle-closure glaucoma (59.8% vs. 40.2%) and secondary glaucoma (70.3% vs. 29.7%) cases. Medical treatment using a single drug and multiple drugs was employed for 245 (23%) and 825 (77%) patients, respectively. Within-group analysis showed that laser iridotomy and trabeculectomy were the most commonly performed laser and surgical procedures in both institution types.
CONCLUSION: There is a contrasting profile of glaucoma between clinical institutions in the Philippines with openangle glaucoma being more predominant in private centers while closed-angle glaucoma and secondary glaucoma being more frequent in government centers. Our findings may provide important preliminary information that can aid future health studies or training programs.
Human ; Glaucoma ; Patients