Objectives: Existing standards of care recommend operative management for fragility fractures of the hip. Early intervention has been associated with lower incidence of morbidity and mortality. A lack of consensus remains in the Philippines however, regarding timing of surgery. We sought to determine the effects of surgical timing on in-hospital complications among Filipino patients with fragility hip fractures. Methods: All patients admitted for fragility hip fractures in a single tertiary-care facility from 2014-2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Subjects treated within 72 hours were grouped under “early intervention,” while those managed beyond were designated “delayed intervention.” Primary outcomes were complications during admission, while secondary outcome was length of hospital stay. A total of 96 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which 41 (42.71%) underwent early intervention. Baseline characteristics for both groups were comparable. Results: A significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcers (2.4% for ≤72hours vs 45.5%; p=<0.0001), pneumonia (7.32% vs 47.27%; p=<0.0001), and urinary tract infection (4.88% vs 40%; p=<0.0001), as well as shorter hospital stay (mean: 8.85 days±5.4 vs 14.6 days±13.3; p=0.01) were seen in the early intervention group. More cases of documented deep vein thrombosis were recorded in the delayed intervention group (83.3% versus 16.6%), as was the only case of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion Early intervention showed a significantly lower incidence of in-hospital complications among patients with fragility fractures of the hip, suggesting that surgery within 72 hours may lead to better outcomes by helping to reduce the incidence of pressure sores, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection among Filipinos with hip fractures, while reducing length of admission.
Osteoporotic Fractures

No abstract available.
Osteoporosis ; Osteoporotic Fractures

Bisphosphonates have been used as first-line therapy to reduce the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Several publications have recently described the occurrence of low-energy subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures with long-term bisphosphonate use, so called atypical femoral fracture. Atypical fracture is a rare condition, and the treatment and its effectiveness have not been adequately reported. Thus, finding appropriate treatment is difficult. In this report, the authors reviewed the treatment of atypical fracture and described helpful suggestions for surgery.
Diphosphonates ; Femoral Fractures ; Incidence ; Osteoporotic Fractures

Recently, atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) have been found in patients who were prescribed bisphosphonate to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Although the occurrence of AFF is rare, there are some concerns, such as a higher risk of delayed or non-union of AFF. This paper reviews the treatment of AFF and suggests some considerations during surgery.
Femoral Fractures ; Humans ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporotic Fractures ; Teriparatide

PURPOSE: This study was to examine the relationship of knowledge, health beliefs, and prevention behaviors of osteoporotic fracture in outpatients with osteoporosis. METHODS: The subjects were 120 outpatients receiving osteoporosis treatment on K hospital in G city from Dec. 2007 to Feb. 2008. Questionnaires were collected and analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 12.0 program for descriptive statistics, and t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Subjects were treated for fracture about 28 months. The mean score of knowledge, health belief and prevention behaviors in subjects were 17.5 +/- 3.22, 2.8 +/- 0.23 and 2.8 +/- 0.38 respectively. The score of health belief recorded the lowest point. However, the score of knowledge varied with general and disease-related characteristics of subjects. In contrast, the score of prevention behaviors did not showed any significant differences. Fracture prevention behavior in subjects showed rather higher relationship with the health belief system than the knowledge of fracture prevention. CONCLUSION: The present work suggested that education program for prevention behaviors of fracture should be developed to focus on altering the health belief system rather than the knowledge of osteoporotic fracture prevention. Furthermore, individual education program based on living circumstances and daily life habits should be also developed.
Humans ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporotic Fractures ; Outpatients ; Surveys and Questionnaires

No abstract available.
Absorptiometry, Photon* ; Bone Density* ; Femur* ; Osteoporotic Fractures*

No abstract available.
Osteoporotic Fractures ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Vertebroplasty

No abstract available.
Absorptiometry, Photon* ; Bone Density* ; Osteoporotic Fractures* ; Spine*

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVF) are an increasing public health problem. Cement augmentation (vertebroplasty of kyphoplasty) helps stabilize painful OVF refractory to medical treatment. This stabilization is thought to improve pain and functional outcome. Vertebroplasty consists of injecting cement into a fractured vertebra using a percutaneous transpedicular approach. Balloon kyphoplasty uses an inflatable balloon prior to injecting the cement. Although kyphoplasty is associated with significant improvement of local kyphosis and less cement leakage, this does not result in long-term clinical and functional improvement. Moreover, vertebroplasty is favored by some due to the high cost of kyphoplasty. The injection of cement increases the stiffness of the fracture vertebrae. This can lead, in theory, to adjacent OVF. However, many studies found no increase of subsequent fracture when comparing medical treatment to cement augmentation. Kyphoplasty can have a protective effect due to restoration of sagittal balance.
Fractures, Compression ; Kyphoplasty ; Kyphosis ; Osteoporotic Fractures ; Public Health ; Spine ; Vertebroplasty

PURPOSE: This paper reviewed the safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement in osteoporotic femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching multiple databases including five Korean databases, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Safety was assessed through the incidence of complication. The effectiveness was assessed through the failure rate of anchor fixation, improvement of function and radiological assessment (sliding distance of lag screw and cutout). The safety and effectiveness of anchor augmentation with bone cement were assessed by reviewing all articles reporting on the treatment. Two researchers carried out independently each stage from the literature search to data extraction. The tools of Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Networks were used to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS: Six studies were considered eligible. The safety results revealed a small amount of cement leakage (1 case), but no other severe complications were encountered. Regarding the effectiveness, the failure rate of anchor fixation was 16.7% and the Harris's hip score showed no significant improvement. The sliding distance of the anchor was similar in the cement augmentation group and non-cement group but there was no cutout. CONCLUSION: The results of the assessment suggest that the safety is acceptable, but further research will be needed to verify the effectiveness of the treatment.
Bone Cements ; Femoral Fractures ; Femur ; Hip ; Incidence ; Osteoporotic Fractures