1.Clinical Experiences of the Orbital Tumors.
Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine 1996;13(1):78-85
No abstract available.
Orbit*
2.Moll's Cyst Occurring in the Orbital Septum.
So Min HWANG ; Min Wook KIM ; Yong Hui JUNG ; Hyung Do KIM ; Hong Il KIM
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2014;41(3):292-293
No abstract available.
Orbit*
3.Two rare malignant tumors in the orbit.
In Sik HONG ; Jeong Yoon LEE ; Hee Chang AHN ; Yea Sik HAN
Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 1991;18(3):486-493
No abstract available.
Orbit*
4.Measurement of Orbital Volume from Different Slice Thickness Facial Computed Tomography Scans Using a Semi-automatic Program.
Hye Jee KIM ; Ji Sang HAN ; In Ki PARK ; Sam Jin CHOI ; Jae Ho SHIN
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2016;57(11):1671-1677
PURPOSE: To compare the orbital volume calculated from various slice thickness facial computed tomography scans using a semi-automated computer program. METHODS: Axial and coronal scans of 2, 2.5, 3 mm slice thickness facial computed tomography scans were used to measure the orbital volume. The cross-sectional area was determined from each slice using a semi-automated computer program (MATLAB 2009a®, MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA), and then the volume was calculated from serial reconstruction of the cross sections. RESULTS: The measured value in the 2 mm images was 33.14 ± 2.37 cm³ in the right orbit and 34.32 ± 2.60 cm³ in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 35.54 ± 3.58 cm³ in the right orbit and 34.96 ± 4.05 cm³ in the left orbit for the coronal scans. In the 2.5 mm images, the values were 33.28 ± 3.35 cm³ in the right orbit and 33.73 ± 4.10 cm³ in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 35.24 ± 3.98 cm³ in the right orbit and 35.10 ± 3.93 cm³ in the left orbit for the coronal scans. In the 3 mm images, the values were 33.23 ± 2.70 cm³ in the right orbit and 33.39 ± 2.69 cm³ in the left orbit for the axial scans, and 33.20 ± 3.64 cm³ in the right orbit and 32.95 ± 3.45 cm³ in the left orbit for the coronal scans. In the 3 mm image, there was not a significant difference in the calculated volume between the axial and coronal scans (p(3mm) = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Because there is no difference in the results of the orbital volumetric measurements between three other slice thicknesses in the axial scan, using axial scan images with a computer program that semi-automatically calculates orbital volume is useful. In addition, the volume measured by thick slice images has more reproducibility than the volume measured by thin slice images.
Orbit*
5.White-Eyed Medial Orbital Wall Fracture with Oculocardiac Symptoms.
Min Suk KANG ; Eui Cheol JEONG
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2015;42(2):247-249
No abstract available.
Orbit*
6.CT findings of orbital inflammatory diseases.
Jang Min KIM ; Hyun Joon SHIN ; Jung Hyuk KIM ; Won Hyuck SUH
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1991;27(5):597-601
No abstract available.
Orbit*
8.Case report of traumatic orbital apex syndrome and superior orbital fissure syndrome
Young Ihl KIM ; Un Bong PAIK ; Jong Ha KIM ; Jae Man HYUN ; Moon Young LEE ; Sung Won PARK ; Myung Hwan KIM
Journal of the Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 1994;15(4):275-280
No abstract available.
Orbit
9.A clinical study of pseudotumor of the orbit.
Yang Gi MIN ; Ic Tae KIM ; Won Seok YU
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 1991;34(6):1242-1246
No abstract available.
Orbit*