1.Research for relevance between nitrate transporters (Sialin) and ischemia-reperfusion injury in free flaps
Jiajie OUYANG ; Ming SU ; Delong LI ; Qifang NIU ; Yang YANG ; Zhengxue HAN
Chinese Journal of Microsurgery 2017;40(3):252-256
Objective To explore the relevance between nitrate transporters (Sialin) and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in free flaps.Methods Twenty rats were randomly divided into control group and experimental group,10 in each group.After preparatiing 4 cm×8 cm free tissue flap on left lower abdominal,the rats in experimental group were experienced ischemia in 6 hours,then reperfusion.The rats in control group were without ischemia treatment,and tissue flaps were sutured in situ.After postoperative observation for 7 days,the furthest edge of survival flaps were sampled.The expression of Sialin was detected by the Real-time PCR and Western blot.The change of nitrate content was analysed by chemiluminescence.Results Both of results of Real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot,it was found that expression levels of Sialin in the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group(0.945±0.0530)(P<0.05).Applying Real-time quantitative PCR relative quantitative analysis,it was found that the experimental group Sialin mRNA expression level was 0.284±0.0486,significantly lower than that of control group (0.945±0.0530)(P<0.05).Using Western blot technical analysis,experimental Sialin protein expression level was(0.1413±0.0446),significantly lower than the control group (0.3519±0.0368) (P<0.05).The concentration of nitrate of test results found that the expression of nitrate transporters (Sialin) linearly related with the concentration of nitrate in free flaps,which means tbe Sialin expression level decreased,the nitrate content decreased(P<0.05,R=0.81).Conclusion The concentration of nitrate was linearly related to the level of Sialin expression:when Sialin expression levels dropped,the concentration of nitrate decreased.Nitrate transporters(Sialin) may be correlated with IRI in free flaps.
2.Analysis of the application and effect of the PDCA cycle nursing management model in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis
CHEN Xuanjun ; OUYANG Jiajie ; ZHU Wenzhen ; QING Anrong
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases 2019;27(8):527-530
Objective:
To explore the application and effect of the PDCA cycle nursing management model in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.
Methods :
Thirty patients with peri-implant mucositis were treated nonsurgically. Before treatment, the 30 patients had no history of systemic diseases, drug allergies, or bad habits. According to the principle of single-blind randomized control, the patients were divided into two groups: 15 patients were assigned to the control group and received routine clinical nursing and oral hygiene education according to the doctor′s prescription; and 15 patients were assigned to the intervention group, in which the PDCA cycle nursing management model was adopted. The four steps of “plan, do, check and act” were carried out. The plaque index (PL), gingival index (GI) and probe depth (PD) in the two groups were recorded before treatment and 3 and 6 months after treatment.
Results:
There was no significant difference in the PL, GI or PD between the intervention group and the control group before treatment (P > 0.05). Three months after treatment, the PL in the intervention group was 1.25 ± 0.44, while the PL in the control group was 1.49 ± 0.39, with a significant difference (t=2.56, P=0.008); the GI in the intervention group was 1.21 ± 0.43, while the GI in the control group was 1.56 ± 0.37, with significant difference (t=2.94, P=0.006); and the PD in the intervention group was 4.39 ± 0.41 while the PD in the control group was 4.47 ± 0.52 mm, with no significant difference (t=2.24, P=0.062). Six months after treatment, the PL in the intervention group was 1.26 ± 0.48, while the PL in the control group was 1.51 ± 0.42, with a significant difference (t=2.66, P=0.007); the GI in the intervention group was 1.34 ± 0.28, while the GI in the control group was 1.74 ± 0.48 (t=2.98, P=0.008); and the PD in the intervention group was 4.46 ± 0.52 mm, while the PD in the control group was 4.54 ± 0.66, with no significant difference (t=2.28, P=0.077).
Conclusion
The PDCA cycle nursing management model can enhance patients′ awareness of oral health maintenance, reduce gingival plaque accumulation, and effectively improve the health status of peri-implant tissues.