1.Family response to presume consent system on organ donation from a review of literature
Makmor Tumin ; Khaled Tafran ; NurulHuda Mohd Satar
International e-Journal of Science, Medicine and Education 2015;9(3):20-26
Background: Most countries around the world
have experienced a shortage in organs needed for
transplantation. Organ donation performance is widely
attributed to two important factors: the legislation and
the role of the family. Thus, this literature review aims
to examine the willingness of people for organ donation
while highlighting the importance of having a presumed
consent system.
Methodology: In this study, we explored many papers
of which 10 articles were studied to gain conclusive
understanding of the two factors and their interactions.
Results: Our analysis of literature regarding the
legislation and family response showed that the
presumed consent system for organ donation accounted
for 21 – 30% higher organ donation rates than the
informed consent system. We also found a gap between
the willingness of people to donate their own and their
relatives’ organs. The ratio of people willing to donate
their organs after death was estimated to be 10 – 12%
higher than the ratio of those willing to donate their
relatives’ organs. Furthermore, the study revealed the
importance of a presumed consent system in raising the
willingness of the people and their relatives for donation,
but that did not eliminate the gap.
Conclusion: Countries seeking to overcome organ
shortage and increase organ donation rates by moving
towards the presumed consent system should consider
the importance of providing families with proper
information about this system. The fact that a gap
between the willingness of the people to donate their
own as well as their deceased relatives’ organs exists,
has to be conveyed to the governments, which will be
helpful in optimising organ donation rates.
Tissue and Organ Procurement
2.Muslims’ views on the permissibility of organ donation: The case of Malaysia
Makmor Tumin ; Abdillah Noh ; NurulHuda Mohd Satar ; Khaled Tafran ; Nawi Abdullah ; Wan Ahmad Hafiz Wan Md Adnan ; Mohamad Yusoff Sanusi
International e-Journal of Science, Medicine and Education 2016;10(1):41-48
Background: Some argue that Malaysia’s extremely low
organ donation rate is attributed to religion, specifically
Islam. Testing this argument, this study asked Malaysian
Muslims their views regarding various issues on organ
donation and examined whether their decisions to
donate organs are framed by religious beliefs.
Materials and Methods: This study investigated the
perspectives of Malaysian Muslims between October
and December 2013 in Kuala Lumpur. Self-administered
questionnaires were distributed to 900 people, with 829
responses collected (92% response rate). Respondents’
verbal consent was taken before proceeding with the
survey.
Results: The survey found that more than half of
respondents felt that organ donation is permitted in
Islam and that it is a communal responsibility. However,
the same proportions were unsure on the issues of rewards
for organs or on whether Islam permits the procuring of
organs from brain dead patients.
Conclusions: Malaysian Muslims are not against organ
donation; however, encouraging organ donation requires
the state to address public concerns on Islam’s views on
this sensitive issue through effective policy tools to help
address these gaps in Malaysian Muslims’ understanding
of organ donation. The organ donation rate could
improve by using Islamic scholars as ambassadors for an
organ donation drive to convey the message of Malaysia’s
urgent need for organ donation.
Tissue and Organ Procurement
3.Practice and barriers of family planning: A comparison among muslim women in three main cities, viz. New York City, Tehran and Kuala Lumpur
Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin ; Muzalwana Abdul Talib @ Abdul Mutalib ; Nurulhuda Mohd Satar ; Hanira Hanafi ; Azmah Othman ; Makmor Tumin ; Rustam Khairi Zahari
International e-Journal of Science, Medicine and Education 2016;10(2):30-37
Background: There is a lack of information on the
practice of family planning among Muslim women in
New York City in the United States of America (USA)
[hereinafter known as “Muslim women residing in the
United States” (MWRIU)], Tehran in the Islamic
Republic of Iran (IRI) and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
The limited figures on this issue are either outdated
or mere estimates. The importance of sexual and
reproductive health of Muslim women is expected to
have massive effects on the social and economic progress
of developing countries like the IRI and Malaysia. It is
also expected to have imperative impacts on the attempts
to empower the MWRIU community and enhance their
health status to meet the national standards.
Objective: The study objective is to explore and
compare the practice of family planning, namely on
contraceptive use and abortion among Muslim women
in 3 major cities of different countries.
Methodology: A survey of 379, 377 and
380 respondents from New York City, Tehran and
Kuala Lumpur respectively was conducted in 2013 using
self-administered questionnaires.
Results: There were significant differences in
contraceptive and abortion practices across these
countries (P<0.01). While a significant 86.6% of Iranian
and 66.2% of the MWRIU used contraception, only
22.9% of the Malaysian women did so. For abortion,
13.6% of the MWRIU and 6.3% of the Malaysian
respondents had abortion at least once; while only 22%
of Iranians revealed their abortion history, totaling
32.1% of them who had abortion. Financial problems
and having an unsupportive husband were among the
major factors hindering their practice of healthy family
planning.
Conclusion: Educational campaigns should be promoted
to increase the awareness on the permissibility of family
planning in Islam, as well as on sexual and reproductive
rights.
Family Planning Services