1.Tumour cell membrane laminin expression is associated with basal-like phenotype and poor survival in Nigerian breast cancer
Agboola Aoj ; Ebili Ho ; Iyawe Vo ; Banjo Aaf ; Salami Bs ; Rakha Ea ; Nolan C ; Ellis Io ; Green Ar
The Malaysian Journal of Pathology 2016;38(2):83-92
Introduction: Laminin is a glycoprotein with diverse functions in carcinogenesis including cell
proliferation, invasion, metastases and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In breast cancer
(BC) laminin expression is speculated to be associated with unfavourable clinicopathological and
molecular characteristics. We hypothesize that laminin expression would contributed to the aggressive
nature of basal like and triple negative BC phenotype observed in Black women. Methods: The
expression of laminin was determined in a well-characterised Nigerian cohort of 255 BC using tissue
microarray and immunohistochemistry. Laminin expression was compared with clinical, pathological
and survival characteristics. Results: Laminin was expressed in 146 (57.3%) cases and significantly
correlated with younger age at diagnosis (p=0.005), premenopausal status (p=0.003), expression
of EGFR (p=0.002), ID4 and MTA1, basal cytokeratin 5/6, p53, and triple negative tumours (all
p<0.001). In addition, there was an inverse association of laminin expression with E-cadherin (p=0.03),
ER and PgR (all p<0.001) and a trend with BRCA1 (p=0.05). Univariate survival analysis showed
tumours positive for laminin had significantly poorer breast cancer specific survival (BCSS, p=0.009)
and disease free interval (p=0.03), but not associated in Cox multivariate analysis. Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that laminin expression may have important roles in the aggressive nature
observed in the basal-like and triple negative molecular subtype of Nigerian BC women.
2.Internet search analytics for shoulder arthroplasty: what questions are patients asking?
Johnathon R. MCCORMICK ; Matthew C. KRUCHTEN ; Nabil MEHTA ; Dhanur DAMODAR ; Nolan S. HORNER ; Kyle D. CAREY ; Gregory P. NICHOLSON ; Nikhil N. VERMA ; Grant E. GARRIGUES
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2023;26(1):55-63
Background:
Common questions about shoulder arthroplasty (SA) searched online by patients and the quality of this content are unknown. The purpose of this study is to uncover questions SA patients search online and determine types and quality of webpages encountered.
Methods:
The “People also ask” section of Google Search was queried to return 900 questions and associated webpages for general, anatomic, and reverse SA. Questions and webpages were categorized using the Rothwell classification of questions and assessed for quality using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria.
Results:
According to Rothwell classification, the composition of questions was fact (54.0%), value (24.7%), and policy (21.3%). The most common webpage categories were medical practice (24.6%), academic (23.2%), and medical information sites (14.4%). Journal articles represented 8.9% of results. The average JAMA score for all webpages was 1.69. Journals had the highest average JAMA score (3.91), while medical practice sites had the lowest (0.89). The most common question was, “How long does it take to recover from shoulder replacement?”
Conclusions
The most common questions SA patients ask online involve specific postoperative activities and the timeline of recovery. Most information is from low-quality, non-peer-reviewed websites, highlighting the need for improvement in online resources. By understanding the questions patients are asking online, surgeons can tailor preoperative education to common patient concerns and improve postoperative outcomes.
3.Structure and function of epididymal protein cysteine-rich secretory protein-1.
Kenneth P ROBERTS ; Daniel S JOHNSTON ; Michael A NOLAN ; Joseph L WOOTERS ; Nicole C WAXMONSKY ; Laura B PIEHL ; Kathy M ENSRUD-BOWLIN ; David W HAMILTON
Asian Journal of Andrology 2007;9(4):508-514
Cysteine-rich secretory protein-1 (CRISP-1) is a glycoprotein secreted by the epididymal epithelium. It is a member of a large family of proteins characterized by two conserved domains and a set of 16 conserved cysteine residues. In mammals, CRISP-1 inhibits sperm-egg fusion and can suppress sperm capacitation. The molecular mechanism of action of the mammalian CRISP proteins remains unknown, but certain non-mammalian CRISP proteins can block ion channels. In the rat, CRISP-1 comprises two forms referred to as Proteins D and E. Recent work in our laboratory demonstrates that the D form of CRISP-1 associates transiently with the sperm surface, whereas the E form binds tightly. When the spermatozoa are washed, the E form of CRISP-1 persists on the sperm surface after all D form has dissociated. Cross-linking studies demonstrate different protein-protein interaction patterns for D and E, although no binding partners for either protein have yet been identified. Mass spectrometric analyses revealed a potential post-translational modification on the E form that is not present on the D form. This is the only discernable difference between Proteins D and E, and presumably is responsible for the difference in behavior of these two forms of rat CRISP-1. These studies demonstrate that the more abundant D form interacts with spermatozoa transiently, possibly with a specific receptor on the sperm surface, consistent with a capacitation-suppressing function during sperm transit and storage in the epididymis, and also confirm a tightly bound population of the E form that could act in the female reproductive tract.
Amino Acid Sequence
;
Animals
;
Conserved Sequence
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Mammals
;
Membrane Glycoproteins
;
genetics
;
metabolism
;
Molecular Sequence Data
;
Rats
;
Spermatozoa
;
physiology
4.Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nolan J. BROWN ; Zach PENNINGTON ; Cathleen C. KUO ; Alexander M. LOPEZ ; Bryce PICTON ; Sean SOLOMON ; Oanh T. NGUYEN ; Chenyi YANG ; Evelyne K. TANTRY ; Hania SHAHIN ; Julian GENDREAU ; Stephen ALBANO ; Martin H. PHAM ; Michael Y. OH
Asian Spine Journal 2023;17(6):1139-1154
Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L-ALIF), which employs laparoscopic cameras to facilitate a less invasive approach, originally gained traction during the 1990s but has subsequently fallen out of favor. As the envelope for endoscopic approaches continues to be pushed, a recurrence of interest in laparoscopic and/or endoscopic anterior approaches seems possible. Therefore, evaluating the current evidence base in regard to this approach is of much clinical relevance. To this end, a systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the following keywords: “(laparoscopic OR endoscopic) AND (anterior AND lumbar).” Out of the 441 articles retrieved, 22 were selected for quantitative analysis. The primary outcome of interest was the radiographic fusion rate. The secondary outcome was the incidence of perioperative complications. Meta-analysis was performed using RStudio’s “metafor” package. Of the 1,079 included patients (mean age, 41.8±2.9 years), 481 were males (44.6%). The most common indication for L-ALIF surgery was degenerative disk disease (reported by 18 studies, 81.8%). The mean follow-up duration was 18.8±11.2 months (range, 6–43 months). The pooled fusion rate was 78.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.9–90.4). Complications occurred in 19.2% (95% CI, 13.4–27.4) of L-ALIF cases. Additionally, 7.2% (95% CI, 4.6–11.4) of patients required conversion from L-ALIF to open surgery. Although L-ALIF does not appear to be supported by studies available in the literature, it is important to consider the context from which these results have been obtained. Even if these results are taken at face value, the failure of endoscopy to have a role in the ALIF approach does not mean that it should not be incorporated in posterior approaches.