1.An Effective Integrated Management System for Educational Reform
Megumi INABA ; Michiko SATAKE ; Yoichi NAKAMURA ; Nobuo KUBOTA ; Kazuko MAEDA ; Tsukasa ABE
Medical Education 2003;34(5):315-322
The Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences has introduced an integrated education management system to improve the quality of education. The management system was implemented by the Academic Affairs Committee and is run by the newly-created Kyouiku Suishin Shitsu (Educational Development Services). The management system evaluated past curricula and coordinated the introduction of new courses and integrated curricula designed to stimulate selflearning by students. The management system also integrated the student evaluation system and simultaneously coordinated faculty development workshops for all university staff to improve teaching skills. Several questionnaires showed that the new curricula met students' learning needs and provided a more objective evaluation system. The integrated education management system functions as a positive component in the improvement of the education system for students of allied health professions.
2.A study of the distribution of board-certified specialists in emergency medicine at accredited training hospitals for postgraduate education
Nobuo KURAMOTO ; Takeshi MORIMOTO ; Yoshie KUBOTA ; Yuko MAEDA ; Susumu SEKI ; Miyabi KITADA ; Toshiyuki ITO ; Atsushi HIRAIDE
Medical Education 2008;39(5):325-327
1) We compiled lists of accredited training hospitals for postgraduate education from the matching program list and of hospitals that employ board-certified specialists in emergency medicine.We then evaluated the number of training hospitals that employ board-certified specialists.
2) There are 1072 accredited hospitals for postgraduate education. However, only 546 (50.8%) of these hospitals employ board-certified specialists in emergency medicine.
3) Accredited training hospitals with emergency-medicine specialists are prevalent in Okinawa, Tokushima, and Kagawa prefectures.However, the prevalence of these hospitals is surprisingly low in metropolitan areas.
3.Major Qualitative Research Methods in Patient-doctor Communication Studies
Eiko Kobori ; Yuko Maeda ; Yoshie Kubota ; Susumu Seki ; Kaori Takada ; Nobuo Kuramoto ; Atsushi Hiraide ; Takeshi Morimoto
General Medicine 2008;9(1):5-12
Qualitative research has gained greater attention in medical research, but it might seem to be unscientific because qualitative and quantitative research methods are grounded in different paradigm.
In this article, we introduce three major qualitative research methods frequently used in studies of patient-doctor communications: 1) in-depth interviews; 2) focus group interviews and, 3) semi-structured interviews.
Each qualitative research method has different or common advantages and disadvantages, and which methods should be used depends on the study objectives. Qualitative research and quantitative research are complementary: while quantitative research explains the prevalence or variation of an issue, qualitative research explains the reasons or processes of that prevalence or variation. Combination of the two methods enables the gathering of more comprehensive and explanatory results.