The glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test is the most widely accepted laboratory test for evaluating long term glycaemic control. Patient’s understanding of HbA1c can lead to better glycaemic control. This study is aimed to determine the awareness and level of understanding of HbA1c among type 2 DM patients and its association with glycaemic control. A cross-sectional descriptive study among Type 2 DM patients undergoing routine follow up in an endocrine clinic of a tertiary centre in Malaysia. Patients were invited to answer a validated questionnaire which assessed their awareness and understanding of HbA1c. Their last HbA1c results were retrieved from the laboratory information system. A total of 92 participants were recruited. Fifty-six (60.9%) were aware of the term HbA1c. Fifty percent were categorised as having good HbA1c understanding, with age, monthly income and level of education being the factors associated with understanding. No significant association was noted between HbA1c understanding and glycaemic control, although more patients with good HbA1c understanding had achieved the target glycaemic control compared to those with poor understanding. The level of HbA1c awareness and understanding was acceptable. Factors associated with understanding were age, income and level of education. Continuing efforts however, must be made to improve patients understanding of their disease and clinical disease biomarkers.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

This is a questionnaire survey of dietary supplement usage among students in the International Medical University. Just over two-fifths of these students reported using dietary supplements daily. This high usage of dietary supplements is in contrast their expressed ambivalence about these products.

INTRODUCTIONThe aims of this article were to review the role of surgical resection in the management of high-grade gliomas and to determine whether there is any survival benefit from surgical resection.

METHODSA literature review of the influence of surgical resection on outcome was carried out. Relevant original and review papers were obtained through a PubMed search using the following keywords: glioma, resection, prognosis and outcome.

RESULTSPresently, there is a lack of evidence to support a survival benefit with aggressive glioma resection, but this should not detract patients from undergoing surgery as there are many other clinical benefits of glioma excision. In addition, limiting surgical morbidity through the use of adjuvant techniques such as intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI and awake craniotomy is becoming increasingly important.

CONCLUSIONSIdeally, a randomised controlled trial would be the best way to resolve the issue of whether (and to what extent) surgical resection leads to improvements in patient outcome and survival, but this would not be ethical. The second best option would be well-controlled retrospective studies with a multivariate analysis of all potential confounding factors.

Glioma ; classification ; surgery ; Humans ; Singapore ; Survival Analysis