The combination of preoperative chemoradi-otherapy and surgery has become the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Up to 30% of patients received pathologic complete response(pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy, for whom low rates of local recurrence and improved outcome after surgery were achieved. Given that, some authors have recommended local resection for clinical extensive response or non operative "wait and see" policy for clinical complete response(cCR) respectively, in which radical surgery-associated complication and dysfunction can be avoided. Current imaging can provide excellent accuracy in primary staging of rectal cancer, however, when used for restaging, the ability is less satisfactory, especially for pCR prediction, as a result of modification on tumor and surrounding tissue induced by neoadjuvant therapy. The question on how to identify patients with pCR before surgery has received more attention recently. On the basis of pathological findings after surgery, in this article, we review the reliability and predictive ability of current imaging for restaging and pCR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation combined with radical surgery has been established as the standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer(T3-T4 and/or N1-N2). Approximately 20% patients who achieve complete pathological response have an improved prognosis. Appropriate patient selection may help avoid over-treatment. Evaluation of treatment response mostly with imaging study and pathology after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and following surgery is essential for the subsequent selection of treatment strategy.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Patient Selection ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms ; therapy

OBJECTIVETo analyze the association between the response of primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and lymph node status in mid and low rectal cancer.

METHODSSeventy-one patients with locally advanced mid and low rectal cancer underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery. Surgical specimens were examined by surgeons and pathologists to obtain more lymph nodes and the histological sections were examined. Tumor responses to preoperative CRT were assessed in terms of tumor downstaging and tumor regression. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between tumor regression and lymph node status.

RESULTSAll the patients completed the neoadjuvant CRT. Twelve patients achieved pathological complete response, of whom one was not operated and on surveillance. Pathological examination of the remaining 70 patients showed that the tumor was downstaged to T 0-2 group in 39 patients, among whom 5 patients (12.8%) had positive lymph nodes. Tumor was not downstaged in 31 patients, of whom 10 patients (32.3%) had positive nodes. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONTumor regression is consistent with the reduction of lymph node metastasis after preoperative CRT.

Surgery is still considered to be the mainstay for the treatment of localized gastric cancer with negative margins (R0-resection) and an adequate lymph-node-dissection (D2-lymphadenectomy). Unfortunately, most cases of gastric cancer are only diagnosed at an advanced stage due to frequent recurrences after primary resection in curative intent. In order to improve prognosis after curative resection, in the recent past, patients with locally advanced tumors were subjected to a pre-, peri-, or postoperative treatment. Interestingly, postoperative chemotherapy has significantly improved survival after gastric resection in Asia, adjuvant radiochemotherapy is favored in North America and perioperative chemotherapy is considered as a treatment of choice in Europe indicating region specific approach towards the treatment. Recently there has also been growing evidence of positive outcomes of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on patient survival. In the present article, we discuss the concepts of neoadjuvant treatment approach and provide recommendations to surgeons based on current evidence.
Asia ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Europe ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; North America ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Stomach Neoplasms

PURPOSE: Oral capecitabine has demonstrated to be safe and efficient as neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery. METHODS: From January 2000 to June 2010, 238 patients were treated at our center for locally advanced rectal cancers using conventional NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the factors associated with oncologic outcomes with log rank and Cox regression tests. RESULTS: The incidence of grade >3 capecitabine-related toxicity was found to be 4.6%. A pathologic complete response was observed in 14.7% of patients. The 5-year overall and 5-year disease-free survival rate, local and systemic recurrence rate were 82.8%, 75.1%, 4.8%, and 20.3%. Abdominoperineal resection and node-positive disease were independent prognostic factors of 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and systemic recurrence. CONCLUSION: NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery showed favorable long-term oncologic outcomes with benefits of acceptable toxicity and convenience. We suggest that capecitabine can be one of the favorable therapeutic options for NCRT in rectal cancer.
Capecitabine* ; Chemoradiotherapy* ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Incidence ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Recurrence

Surgical resection offers the only chance of cure for nonmetastatic exocrine pancreatic cancer. However, only 15 to 20 percent of patients have potentially resectable disease at diagnosis; approximately 40 percent have distant metastases, and another 30 to 40 percent have locally advanced unresectable tumors. Typically, patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer have tumor invasion into adjacent critical structures, particularly the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. The optimal management of these patients is controversial, and there is no internationally embraced standard approach. Therapeutic options include chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. While it is reasonable to restage and reevaluate the potential for resectability after neoadjuvant therapy, the frequency of a complete resection and long-term survival is low for patients who initially have categorically unresectable tumors. Others have disease that is categorized as "borderline resectable." While these patients are potentially resectable, the high likelihood of an incomplete resection has prompted interest in strategies to "downstage" the tumor or to increase the likelihood of a margin-negative resection prior to surgical exploration using neoadjuvant therapy. The rationale for neoadjuvant therapy is as follows. First, it is to improve the selection of patients for whom resection will not offer a survival benefit (i.e., those who rapidly progress to metastatic disease during preoperative therapy). Second, it is to increase rates of margin-negative resections, which is the major goal of surgery. Third, it is to start an early treatment of micrometastatic disease. Initial attempt at downstaging with chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a combination followed by restaging and surgical exploration in responders rather than upfront surgery is suggested.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Humans ; Mesenteric Artery, Superior ; Neoadjuvant Therapy* ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Pancreatic Neoplasms*

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after a 6-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis at a total dose of 50.4 Gy for 6 weeks. Oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 weeks. Surgery was performed 2-4 weeks following the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2011, 44 patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 41 patients completed the scheduled treatment. Pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 9 patients (20.9%). T down-staging and N down-staging were observed in 32 patients (74.4%) and 33 patients (76.7%), respectively. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 5 patients (11.4%). The pCR rate was similar with the pCR rates obtained after conventional NCRT at our institute and at other institutes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after 6-week NCRT was safe, but it was no more effective than conventional NCRT.
Chemoradiotherapy* ; Deoxycytidine ; Drug Therapy* ; Fluorouracil ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Pelvis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Capecitabine

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after a 6-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis at a total dose of 50.4 Gy for 6 weeks. Oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 weeks. Surgery was performed 2-4 weeks following the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2011, 44 patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 41 patients completed the scheduled treatment. Pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 9 patients (20.9%). T down-staging and N down-staging were observed in 32 patients (74.4%) and 33 patients (76.7%), respectively. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 5 patients (11.4%). The pCR rate was similar with the pCR rates obtained after conventional NCRT at our institute and at other institutes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after 6-week NCRT was safe, but it was no more effective than conventional NCRT.
Chemoradiotherapy* ; Deoxycytidine ; Drug Therapy* ; Fluorouracil ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Pelvis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Capecitabine

BACKGROUNDThe effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) treatment for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of NCRT followed by surgery (NCRTS) with surgery alone (SA) for EC.

METHODSThe PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched up to August 2015 for all the published studies that investigated EC patients receiving either NCRTS or SA, and the reference lists were also manually examined for the eligible studies. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI s) as effective size was determined to assess the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates (SRs), postoperative morbidity, and postoperative mortality. Heterogeneity was determined using the Q-test. The Begg's test and Egger's test were used for assessing any potential publication bias.

RESULTSOf 1120 identified studies, 16 eligible studies were included in this analysis (involving 2549 patients). Overall, the pooled results suggested that NCRTS was associated with significantly improved 1-year (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), 3-year (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39), and 5-year (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.18-1.56) SRs. However, the results also indicated that NCRTS had no or little effect on postoperative morbidity (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.82-1.05) and postoperative mortality (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.56-2.44).

CONCLUSIONSCompared with SA, NCRTS can increase 1-, 3-, and 5-year SRs in patients with EC.

Recently, treatment strategy optimization for neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer includes two aspects: (1) Increasing treatment intensity may improve pathological complete response rate, including increasing radiation dose or concurrent chemotherapy intensity, or shifting adjuvant chemotherapy; (2) Short-course radiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy which can promise treatment efficacy will decrease toxicity and lead to better tolerance. Long-course chemoradiotherapy is the recent treatment standard for locally advanced rectal cancer. NCCN guidelines do not recommend combined chemotherapy in the radiotherapy period. However, it is important for individualized treatment of rectal cancer if appropriate patients who may benefit from the combined concurrent chemotherapy can be selected. Short-course radiotherapy is defined as 5 Gy × 5. It is recommended for T3 or N+ rectal cancer in NCCN guidelines, but not for T4 patients. In ESMO guidelines, stratified patients of intermediate risk by MRI can be treated with either short-course or long-course radiotherapy, but short-course radiotherapy is not recommended for T4 or positive mesorectum fascia (MRF+) patients with high risk. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy incorporated in the neoadjuvant part has been a therapeutic choice in NCCN guidelines. However, It is still unclear whether chemotherapy upfront as a component of neoadjuvant treatment or even completion of chemotherapy before surgery can improve treatment outcome or not. There are phase II( studies focused on this issue and final results are pending.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; Treatment Outcome