OBJECTIVETo analyze the association between the response of primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and lymph node status in mid and low rectal cancer.

METHODSSeventy-one patients with locally advanced mid and low rectal cancer underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery. Surgical specimens were examined by surgeons and pathologists to obtain more lymph nodes and the histological sections were examined. Tumor responses to preoperative CRT were assessed in terms of tumor downstaging and tumor regression. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between tumor regression and lymph node status.

RESULTSAll the patients completed the neoadjuvant CRT. Twelve patients achieved pathological complete response, of whom one was not operated and on surveillance. Pathological examination of the remaining 70 patients showed that the tumor was downstaged to T 0-2 group in 39 patients, among whom 5 patients (12.8%) had positive lymph nodes. Tumor was not downstaged in 31 patients, of whom 10 patients (32.3%) had positive nodes. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONTumor regression is consistent with the reduction of lymph node metastasis after preoperative CRT.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation combined with radical surgery has been established as the standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer(T3-T4 and/or N1-N2). Approximately 20% patients who achieve complete pathological response have an improved prognosis. Appropriate patient selection may help avoid over-treatment. Evaluation of treatment response mostly with imaging study and pathology after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and following surgery is essential for the subsequent selection of treatment strategy.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Patient Selection ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms ; therapy

The combination of preoperative chemoradi-otherapy and surgery has become the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Up to 30% of patients received pathologic complete response(pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy, for whom low rates of local recurrence and improved outcome after surgery were achieved. Given that, some authors have recommended local resection for clinical extensive response or non operative "wait and see" policy for clinical complete response(cCR) respectively, in which radical surgery-associated complication and dysfunction can be avoided. Current imaging can provide excellent accuracy in primary staging of rectal cancer, however, when used for restaging, the ability is less satisfactory, especially for pCR prediction, as a result of modification on tumor and surrounding tissue induced by neoadjuvant therapy. The question on how to identify patients with pCR before surgery has received more attention recently. On the basis of pathological findings after surgery, in this article, we review the reliability and predictive ability of current imaging for restaging and pCR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome

Surgery is still considered to be the mainstay for the treatment of localized gastric cancer with negative margins (R0-resection) and an adequate lymph-node-dissection (D2-lymphadenectomy). Unfortunately, most cases of gastric cancer are only diagnosed at an advanced stage due to frequent recurrences after primary resection in curative intent. In order to improve prognosis after curative resection, in the recent past, patients with locally advanced tumors were subjected to a pre-, peri-, or postoperative treatment. Interestingly, postoperative chemotherapy has significantly improved survival after gastric resection in Asia, adjuvant radiochemotherapy is favored in North America and perioperative chemotherapy is considered as a treatment of choice in Europe indicating region specific approach towards the treatment. Recently there has also been growing evidence of positive outcomes of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on patient survival. In the present article, we discuss the concepts of neoadjuvant treatment approach and provide recommendations to surgeons based on current evidence.
Asia ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Europe ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; North America ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Stomach Neoplasms

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after a 6-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis at a total dose of 50.4 Gy for 6 weeks. Oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 weeks. Surgery was performed 2-4 weeks following the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2011, 44 patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 41 patients completed the scheduled treatment. Pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 9 patients (20.9%). T down-staging and N down-staging were observed in 32 patients (74.4%) and 33 patients (76.7%), respectively. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 5 patients (11.4%). The pCR rate was similar with the pCR rates obtained after conventional NCRT at our institute and at other institutes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after 6-week NCRT was safe, but it was no more effective than conventional NCRT.
Chemoradiotherapy* ; Deoxycytidine ; Drug Therapy* ; Fluorouracil ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Pelvis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Capecitabine

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after a 6-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis at a total dose of 50.4 Gy for 6 weeks. Oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 weeks. Surgery was performed 2-4 weeks following the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2011, 44 patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 41 patients completed the scheduled treatment. Pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 9 patients (20.9%). T down-staging and N down-staging were observed in 32 patients (74.4%) and 33 patients (76.7%), respectively. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 5 patients (11.4%). The pCR rate was similar with the pCR rates obtained after conventional NCRT at our institute and at other institutes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after 6-week NCRT was safe, but it was no more effective than conventional NCRT.
Chemoradiotherapy* ; Deoxycytidine ; Drug Therapy* ; Fluorouracil ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Pelvis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Capecitabine

PURPOSE: Oral capecitabine has demonstrated to be safe and efficient as neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery. METHODS: From January 2000 to June 2010, 238 patients were treated at our center for locally advanced rectal cancers using conventional NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the factors associated with oncologic outcomes with log rank and Cox regression tests. RESULTS: The incidence of grade >3 capecitabine-related toxicity was found to be 4.6%. A pathologic complete response was observed in 14.7% of patients. The 5-year overall and 5-year disease-free survival rate, local and systemic recurrence rate were 82.8%, 75.1%, 4.8%, and 20.3%. Abdominoperineal resection and node-positive disease were independent prognostic factors of 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and systemic recurrence. CONCLUSION: NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery showed favorable long-term oncologic outcomes with benefits of acceptable toxicity and convenience. We suggest that capecitabine can be one of the favorable therapeutic options for NCRT in rectal cancer.
Capecitabine* ; Chemoradiotherapy* ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Incidence ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Recurrence

Surgical resection offers the only chance of cure for nonmetastatic exocrine pancreatic cancer. However, only 15 to 20 percent of patients have potentially resectable disease at diagnosis; approximately 40 percent have distant metastases, and another 30 to 40 percent have locally advanced unresectable tumors. Typically, patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer have tumor invasion into adjacent critical structures, particularly the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. The optimal management of these patients is controversial, and there is no internationally embraced standard approach. Therapeutic options include chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. While it is reasonable to restage and reevaluate the potential for resectability after neoadjuvant therapy, the frequency of a complete resection and long-term survival is low for patients who initially have categorically unresectable tumors. Others have disease that is categorized as "borderline resectable." While these patients are potentially resectable, the high likelihood of an incomplete resection has prompted interest in strategies to "downstage" the tumor or to increase the likelihood of a margin-negative resection prior to surgical exploration using neoadjuvant therapy. The rationale for neoadjuvant therapy is as follows. First, it is to improve the selection of patients for whom resection will not offer a survival benefit (i.e., those who rapidly progress to metastatic disease during preoperative therapy). Second, it is to increase rates of margin-negative resections, which is the major goal of surgery. Third, it is to start an early treatment of micrometastatic disease. Initial attempt at downstaging with chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a combination followed by restaging and surgical exploration in responders rather than upfront surgery is suggested.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Humans ; Mesenteric Artery, Superior ; Neoadjuvant Therapy* ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Pancreatic Neoplasms*

The goal of rectal cancer treatment should be to better protect organ function and improve patients' quality of life on the basis of ensuring radical resection. The current evidence has proved the superiority of perioperative chemoradiotherapy in reducing local recurrence and improving long-term survival. From the perspective of organ function protection, however, perioperative chemoradiotherapy has both disadvantages and advantages. Despite the great help in improving long-term outcomes, adverse reactions of chemoradiotherapy can aggravate defecation, urination and sexual dysfunction. Also, for patients with significant or complete remission, if the treatment strategy of local resection or close follow-up is selected, organ function can be preserved to the greatest extent. The key to the choice of treatment is to evaluate preoperatively whether pathological complete response is achieved. It should be kept in mind that preserving organ itself is not the same as protecting organ function. For patients who need perioperative chemoradiation, the optimal treatment methods should be chosen based on the patient's condition. Surgeons should fully evaluate organ function before operation, select the appropriate treatment strategy, pay special attention to the protection of important organs and nerves during surgeries, and carry out close postoperative follow-up and organ function rehabilitation as soon as possible, so as to reduce the incidence of dysfunction and the impact on the quality of life.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Quality of Life ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Watchful Waiting

Surgery is the main treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, for patients with locally advanced lesions, surgery-based comprehensive treatment is the best treatment strategy. According to the results of some randomized controlled clinical studies and meta-analysis, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy is recommended to improve the survival rate of patients. Neoadjuvant therapy includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Great progress has been made in neoadjuvant therapy, but there are still many clinical problems that need to be solved urgently, including the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy, the choice of neoadjuvant regimen and treatment cycle, the best combination and advantages of multimodal treatment, and the selection of responders to treatment, etc. This article provides a systematic review of the latest developments and existing controversies in neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy* ; Esophagectomy ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy