anterior dislocation of the right elbow joint in a 19-year oldman. The patient had been initially treated by a traditionalbone setter, but the elbow remained unreduced. He presentedto us with pain, deformity and limited range of motion of hisright elbow joint. Radiographs revealed an unreducedanterior dislocation of the right elbow joint. We describe theproblems encountered during open reduction andrehabilitation and result one year after the operation with thepatient having a stable elbow and a functional range ofmotion.

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided manipulation and reduction (M&R) of the distal radius fractures (DRF) is believed to improve radiographic indices due to real-time feedback of fracture alignment. The objective of this trial was to compare volar tilt, radial inclination, and radial height on radiographs between Ultrasound guided and conventional (landmark-guided) M&R. Materials and methods: A total of 79 distal radius extraarticular fractures in adults were randomised to Ultrasound guided and conventional (landmark-guided) M&R. The radiograph parameters described above were compared before and after M&R in both groups. Results: Except for volar tilt (P=0.05 difference in difference), there was no difference in both the groups on radiograph parameters i.e. radial inclination and radial height. We estimated a reduction in the incidence of malreduction by 49% (Risk ratio 0.51) and an absolute risk reduction of 22% through USG-guided reduction. We evaluated a number needed to treat 4 through USG-directed M&R of DRF to prevent one unacceptable reduction. There were 9 (22%) and 18 (46%) (P=0.70) unacceptable reductions in USG-guided and landmark-guided M&R. Conclusion: Adding USG guidance to conventional landmark-based closed reduction methods is not beneficial for the accuracy of fracture reduction in Colle’s fracture. However, improved volar tilt in sonographic-directed M&R needs further studies to determine the clinical significance.

Introduction: Despite several techniques for corrective osteotomy in congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS) the published literature lacks a guide for radiographic planning and rationale for the site and level of the osteotomy. The primary objective of this study is to report a technique of radiographically controlled corrective osteotomy using the axis of rotation of the forearm in CRUS. Materials and methods: Children with CRUS underwent corrective osteotomy based on radiographic planning; the extent of rotational correction and functional outcomes were assessed at a mean of 27 months after the operation. Results: Seven forearms in six children of an average of 6.25 years were assessed for correction and functional outcomes. The average pre-operative pronation deformity was 71.5°. The average correction achieved was 64°. At follow-up, there were five excellent and two good functional outcomes. All children could perform daily tasks besides eating with hand and personal hygiene. Conclusion: Radiographic determination of the osteotomy sites by the method described is effective, consistent, and reproducible in achieving optimal functional outcomes in congenital radioulnar synostosis.