INTRODUCTIONThe elderly are often underrepresented in clinical trials for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and cardiologists commonly face management dilemmas in the choice of treatment for this group of patients, particularly concerning the use of invasive revascularisation. This study analysed the characteristics of hospitalised elderly patients with ACS, and compared the outcomes of treatments.

METHODSFrom 29 December 2005 to 26 April 2010, 13,545 patients were admitted for ACS in 16 hospitals across Malaysia. These patients were divided into two groups - elderly (≥ 65 years) and non-elderly (< 65 years). The clinical characteristics, treatment received (invasive or non-invasive) and outcomes (in-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality) of the two groups were compared. The elderly patients were then grouped according to the type of treatment received, and the outcomes of the two subgroups were compared.

RESULTSElderly patients had a higher cardiovascular risk burden and a higher incidence of comorbidities. They were less likely to receive urgent revascularisation for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (elderly: 73.9% vs. non-elderly: 81.4%) and had longer door-to-needle time (elderly: 60 minutes vs. non-elderly: 50 minutes, p = 0.004). The rate of cardiac catheterisation was significantly lower in the elderly group across all ACS strata. Elderly patients had poorer outcomes than non-elderly patients, but those who received invasive treatment appeared to have better outcomes than those who received non-invasive treatment.

CONCLUSIONElderly patients with ACS tend to be undertreated, both invasively and pharmacologically. Invasive treatment seems to yield better outcomes for this group of patients.

Acute Coronary Syndrome ; epidemiology ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; epidemiology ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Humans ; Malaysia ; epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; trends ; Registries ; Survival Rate ; trends

Background: Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy (PTMC) is a procedure of choice for the treatment of severe mitral stenosis. We aimed to describe our experiences on management of rheumatic heart disease with PTMC in Malaysia. Methods: Patients who underwent PTMC were traced through the electronic medical record of University Malaya Medical Centre. The patients detailed echocardiogram parameter pre-procedure, post-procedure and outcome were documented. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version on 18 for windows. Results: 11 patients were treated with PTMC in our centre with 90.9% (n=10) success rate. Subjects underwent PTMC were statistically significant associated with improved echocardiogram parameters as following: increase in mitral valve size (p=0.0058) from 0.89 ± 0.2 cm2 (pre) to 1.4 ± 0.4 cm2 (post); reduction in mean pressure gradient across mitral valve (p=0.0283) from 11.5 ± 4.9 mmHg (pre) to 6.9 ± 3.5 mmHg (post); and reduction (p=0.0019) in elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure from 65.7 ± 21.4 mmHg (pre) to 45.6 ± 10.0 mmHg (post). More than half (62.5%, n=5) of the subjects with favourable Wilkin score 8 or less achieved good outcome defined as post-PTMC mitral valve size ≥ 1.5 cm2 . All subjects with unfavourable Wilkin score of more than 8 only achieved sub-optimal post-PTMC mitral valve size ≤ 1.5 cm2 . Conclusion Given the minimally invasive nature of PTMC with comparable excellent haemodynamic outcome to invasive vascular repair, PTMC should be the recommended first line therapy in mitral valve stenosis.
Mitral Valve Stenosis