1.Evaluation of factors affecting psychological morbidity in emergency medicine practitioners
Momeni MEHDI ; Fahim FARSHID ; Vahidi ELNAZ ; Nejati AMIR ; Saeedi MORTEZA
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2016;7(3):203-207
BACKGROUND: Assessing and evaluating mental health status can provide educational planners valuable information to predict the quality of physicians'' performance at work. These data can help physicians to practice in the most desired way. The study aimed to evaluate factors affecting psychological morbidity in Iranian emergency medicine practitioners at educational hospitals of Tehran.METHODS: In this cross sectional study 204 participants (emergency medicine residents and specialists) from educational hospitals of Tehran were recruited and their psychological morbidity was assessed by using a 28-question Goldberg General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). Somatization, anxiety and sleep disorders, social dysfunction and depression were evaluated among practitioners and compared to demographic and job related variables.RESULTS: Two hundreds and four participants consisting of 146 (71.6%) males and 58 (28.4%) females were evaluated. Of all participants, 55 (27%) were single and 149 (73%) were married. Most of our participants (40.2%) were between 30–35 years old. By using GHQ-28, 129 (63.2%) were recognized as normal and 75 (36.8%) suffered some mental health disorders. There was a signifi cant gender difference between normal practitioners and practitioners with disorder (P=0.02) while marital status had no significant difference (P=0.2). Only 19 (9.3%) declared having some major mental health issue in the previous month.CONCLUSION: Females encountered more mental health disorders than male (P=0.02) and the most common disorder observed was somatization (P=0.006).
2.Comparison of sedative effectiveness of thiopental versus midazolam in reduction of shoulder dislocation
Vahidi ELNAZ ; Hemati REZVAN ; Momeni MEHDI ; Jahanshir AMIRHOSSEIN ; Saeedi MORTEZA
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2018;9(2):125-129
BACKGROUND: Various sedative drugs have been proposed to control anxiety and agitation in shoulder dislocation, but none of them has been diagnosed as the best sedative and relaxant agent. The study aimed to compare the sedative effectiveness of thiopental versus midazolam in reduction of shoulder dislocation. METHODS: A randomized double-blind controlled trail was performed in 80 patients with shoulder dislocation recruited from the emergency department. Ten patients were excluded and 70 patients were enrolled in the study. Case group received intravenous thiopental 2 mg/kg+2 μg/kg fentanyl while control group received intravenous midazolam 0.1 mg/kg+2 μg/kg fentanyl. Number of times, patients and physician's satisfaction, difficulty of procedure, degree of muscle relaxation, time of sedation and complete recovery, number of patients with apnea episode, O2 saturation, patient's pain score and adverse events were all recorded. RESULTS: Muscular tone had significant difference between the two groups (P-value=0.014) and thiopental was more muscle relaxant than midazolam. Replacement of shoulder dislocation in thiopental group was easier than midazolam group (P-value=0.043). There was no need to use multiple methods of reduction in either group. Before drug infusion the mean±SD VAS scores were 8.37±2.21 in the midazolam group (A) and 8.94±1.78 in the thiopental group (B); mean difference 0.57, 95%CI= –0.38 to 1.52. After completion of the procedure, the mean±SD VAS scores in group (A) and (B) were 3.20±1.30 vs. 3.65±1.30; mean difference –0.45, 95%CI= –1.07 to 0.16. CONCLUSION: Thiopental might be more effective and relaxant than midazolam for reduction of shoulder dislocation.
3.Impact of an educational intervention on medical records documentation
Vahedi Sheikhmotahar HOJAT ; Mirfakhrai MINASADAT ; Vahidi ELNAZ ; Saeedi MORTEZA
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2018;9(2):136-140
BACKGROUND: Inaccurate and incomplete documentation can lead to poor treatment and medico-legal consequences. Studies indicate that teaching programs in this field can improve the documentation of medical records. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of an educational workshop on medical record documentation by emergency medicine residents in the emergency department. METHODS: An interventional study was performed on 30 residents in their first year of training emergency medicine (PGY1), in three tertiary referral hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The essential information that should be documented in a medical record was taught in a 3-day-workshop. The medical records completed by these residents before the training workshop were randomly selected and scored (300 records), as was a random selection of the records they completed one (300 records) and six months (300 records) after the workshop. RESULTS: Documentation of the majority of the essential items of information was improved significantly after the workshop. In particular documentation of the patients' date and time of admission, past medical and social history. Documentation of patient identity, requests for consultations by other specialties, first and final diagnoses were 100% complete and accurate up to 6 months of the workshop. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that an educational workshop improves medical record documentation by physicians in training.
4.Comparison between intravenous morphine versus fentanyl in acute pain relief in drug abusers with acute limb traumatic injury
Hojat Sheikh Motahar Vahedi ; Hadi Hajebi ; Elnaz Vahidi ; Amir Nejati ; Morteza Saeedi
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019;10(1):27-32
BACKGROUND:
Rapid and effective pain relief in acute traumatic limb injuries (ATLI) is one of the most important roles of emergency physicians. In these situations, opioid addiction is an important concern because of the dependency on opioids. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) fentanyl versus morphine in reducing pain in patients with opioid addiction who suffered from ATLI.
METHODS:
In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 307 patients with ATLI, who presented to the emergency department (ED) from February 2016 to April 2016, were randomly divided into two groups. One group (152 patients) received 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine. The other group (155 patients) received 1 mcg/kg IV fentanyl. Patients' demographic data, pain score at specific intervals, vital signs, side effects, satisfaction and the need for rescue analgesia were recorded.
RESULTS:
Eight patients in the morphine group and five patients in the fentanyl group were excluded. Pain score in the fentanyl group had a significant decrease at 5-minute follow-up (P value=0.00). However, at 10, 30, and 60-minute follow-ups no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of pain score reduction. The rescue analgesia was required in 12 (7.7%) patients in the fentanyl group and in 48 (31.6%) patients in the morphine group (P value=0.00). No significant difference was observed regarding side effects, vital signs and patients' satisfaction between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
Fentanyl might be an effective and safe drug in opioid addicts suffering from ATLI.
5.Analgesic effect of paracetamol combined with low-dose morphine versus morphine alone on patients with biliary colic: a double blind, randomized controlled trial
Farnia Reza MOHAMMAD ; Babaei RASOUL ; Shirani FARZANEH ; Momeni MEHDI ; Hajimaghsoudi MAJID ; Vahidi ELNAZ ; Saeedi MORTEZA
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2016;7(1):25-29
BACKGROUND:Numerous drugs have been proposed to alleviate pain in patients with biliary colic, especially opioids, but still there is a tendency to use less narcotics because of their side effects and the unwillingness of some patients. The present study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of paracetamol combined with low-dose morphine versus morphine alone in patients with biliary colic. METHODS:A randomized double-blind controlled trial was performed in 98 patients with biliary colic, recruited from two emergency departments from August 2012 to August 2013. Eleven patients were excluded and the remaining were randomized into two groups:group A received 0.05 mg/kg morphine+1000 mg paracetamol in 100 mL normal saline and group B received 0.1 mg/kg morphine+normal saline (100 mL) as placebo. Pain scores were recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and 15 and 30 minutes after drug administration. Adverse effects and the need for rescue medication (0.75 μg/kg intravenous fentanyl) were also reported within 60 minutes of drug administration. RESULTS:Before the infusion, the mean±SD VAS scores were 8.73±1.57 in group A and 8.53±1.99 in group B. At 15 minutes after drug administration, the mean±SD VAS scores were 2.16±1.90 in group A vs. 2.51±1.86 in group B; mean difference was –0.35, and 95%CI–1.15 to 0.45 (P=0.38). At 30 minutes the mean±SD VAS scores were 1.66±1.59 in group A vs. 2.14±1.79 in group B; mean difference was –0.48, and 95%CI –1.20 to 0.24 (P=0.19). The mean pain scores in the two groups at 15 and 30 minutes demonstrated no significant difference. CONCLUSION:Paracetamol combined with low-dose morphine may be effective for pain management in patients with biliary colic.
6.Acute Angioedema in a Patient Who Received Ketamine and Succinylcholine: A Case Report.
Somayeh VALADKHANI ; Farzaneh RADMARD ; Morteza SAEEDI ; Mohammad Reza FARNIA
Chinese Medical Journal 2016;129(18):2264-2264
Adult
;
Angioedema
;
chemically induced
;
diagnosis
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Ketamine
;
adverse effects
;
Succinylcholine
;
adverse effects