1.Repositioning an Implant-retained Auricular Prosthesis using a Custom Acrylic Base: A Case Report
Mohd Zulkifli Kassim ; Fadzlina Abd Karim ; Tengku Fazrina Tengku Mohd Ariff
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2023;19(No.1):378-381
Prosthetic rehabilitation offers an alternative to surgical procedures for repositioning implant-retained auricular prosthesis. This report illustrates a prosthetic rehabilitation of a 15-year- old male with a unilateral microtia who presented with an unfavorable implant-retained left auricular prosthesis. The implants placed seven years ago were drifted
posterosuperior away from the ideal ear canal position. The fabrication of a new prosthesis on the existing bar-clip
attachment using a custom acrylic base was planned to correct the location. A skin-colour perforated custom acrylic
base was fabricated and designed to extend anteriorly, therefore, shifting the prosthesis forwards into a more natural
location. The custom base was able to relocate the prosthesis’ position without compromising its retention whilst
engaging the existing implant attachment. This in turn enhanced prosthesis acceptability and improved the patient’s
confidence. The custom acrylic base serves as a viable option to reposition the prosthesis influenced by age related
growth and development.
2.Morbidly adherent placenta: One-year case series in a tertiary hospital
Roziana Ramli ; Kamarul Azhar Kamaruddin ; Lau Jia Him ; Aina Mardhiah Abdul Aziz ; Nadia Ramli ; Siti Nordiana Ayub ; Mohd Zulkifli Kassim
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2019;74(2):128-132
Objective: To analyse the clinical characteristics of patients
with morbidly adherent placenta (MAP). Findings of this
study will be used to identify patients at risk of MAP and to
outline the best management strategy to deal with this
devastating condition.
Methods: Delivery records in Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah,
Terengganu from 1st. January 2016 until 31st. December
2016 were reviewed and analysed.
Results: Out of the 15,837 deliveries, eight cases of MAP
were identified. Six out of eight patients had previous
caesarean scar with concomitant placenta praevia, the other
two patients had previous caesarean scar with history of
placenta praevia in previous pregnancies. Seven out of eight
cases were suspected to have MAP based on risk factors.
Correct diagnosis was made by ultrasound in five patients,
all with histologically confirmed moderate/severe degree of
abnormal placentation. The other two cases of ‘unlikely
MAP’, demonstrated segmental MAP intra-operatively with
histologically confirmed milder degree of abnormal
placentation. Total intraoperative blood loss ranged from 0.8
to 20 litres. Prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon
occlusion was associated with significantly less blood loss.
Conclusion: Antenatal diagnosis is essential in outlining the
best management strategy in patients with MAP. Ultrasound
may not be accurate in ruling out lower degree of MAP. Apart
from having a scarred uterus with concomitant placenta
praevia, history of having placenta praevia in previous
pregnancy is also a risk factor for MAP. Prophylactic internal
iliac artery balloon occlusion is associated with significantly
less blood loss and should be considered in cases
suspected with MAP.