1.Prevalence Of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDS) Use In Malaysian Adults And Associated Factors: A Population-Based Survey
S Maria Awaluddin ; Noor Ani Ahmad ; Balkish Mahadir Naidu ; Muslimah Yusof ; Mohamad Aznuddin Abd Razak ; Mohd Kamal Ariff Abdul Ghani
Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2017;17(3):58-65
Chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with adverse effects. However, NSAIDs are among the most popular pain killers and easily available over the counter. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of NSAIDs use in Malaysian adults and among those with chronic diseases such as arthritis, kidney disease, hypertension, heart disease and asthma. It also examined the factors associated with NSAIDs use. Data from the National Health Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2011, a nation-wide survey was analysed. A total of 18231 respondents aged 18 years and above responded to this module. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the association between NSAIDs use and associated factors. The overall prevalence of NSAIDs use among Malaysian adults was 14.2% (95%CI 13.3-15.1). Of the respondents, 4.2% (95%CI 3.8-4.7) took NSAIDs once daily. NSAIDs use was highly associated with those who were ever-told to have arthritis (aOR: 3.03; 95%CI 2.60-3.52) and have difficulty of performing daily activities or work (aOR: 2.06; 95%CI 1.86-2.28). Those who were ever-told to have kidney disease (aOR: 2.36; 95%CI 1.74-3.20), ever-told to have asthma (aOR: 1.36; 95%CI 1.17-1.58), ever-told to have heart disease (aOR: 1.34; 95%CI 1.08-1.65), known hypertension (aOR: 1.22; 95%CI 1.08-1.37) also were associated with NSAIDs use. By socio-demographic profiles, NSAIDs use was positively associated with those who have government benefit scheme or private health insurance (aOR: 1.44; 95%CI 1.31-1.58), higher education level (aOR: 1.35; 95%CI 1.20-1.51), higher household income (aOR: 1.26; 95%CI 1.11-1.44, aOR: 1.12; 95%CI 1.02-1.24), currently working (aOR: 1.25; 95%CI 1.13-1.39) and female (aOR: 1.17; 95%CI 1.07-1.28). NSAIDs use was less likely among those aged 60 years and above (aOR: 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97), Chinese (aOR: 0.41; 95% CI 0.36-0.47) and ‘Others’ ethnicity (aOR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.67-0.99) compared to Malay ethnicity. NSAIDs use is prevalent in Malaysian adults and associated with co-morbidities and higher socio-demographic status, thus appropriate awareness should be promoted and highlighted in the community.
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
;
NSAIDs use
;
NHMS
;
prevalence
;
Malaysia.
2.Barriers to implementing a national health screening program for men in Malaysia: An online survey of healthcare providers
Chirk Jenn Ng ; Chin Hai Teo ; Kar Mun Ang ; Yong Leng Kok ; Khalid Ashraf ; Hui Ling Leong ; Sri Wahyu Taher ; Zakiah Mohd Said ; Zainal Fitri Zakaria ; Ping Foo Wong ; Chee Peng Hor ; Teng Aik Ong ; Husni Hussain ; V Paranthaman P Vengadasalam ; Chiu Wan Ng ; Kavitha Agamutu ; Mohamad Aznuddin Abd Razak
Malaysian Family Physician 2020;15(1):6-14
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the views and practices of healthcare providers and
barriers they encountered when implementing the national health screening program for men in a
public primary care setting in Malaysia.
Methods: An online survey was conducted among healthcare providers across public health clinics in
Malaysia. All family medicine specialists, medical officers, nurses and assistant medical officers involved in the screening program for adult men were invited to answer a 51-item questionnaire via email or WhatsApp. The questionnaire comprised five sections: participants’ socio-demographic information, current screening practices, barriers and facilitators to using the screening tool, and views on the content and format of the screening tool.
Results: A total of 231 healthcare providers from 129 health clinics participated in this survey.
Among them, 37.44% perceived the implementation of the screening program as a “top-down
decision.” Although 37.44% found the screening tool for adult men “useful,” some felt that it was
“time consuming” to fill out (38.2%) and “lengthy” (28.3%). In addition, ‘adult men refuse to answer’
(24.1%) was cited as the most common patient-related barrier.
Conclusions: This study provided useful insights into the challenges encountered by the public
healthcare providers when implementing a national screening program for men. The screening tool for
adult men should be revised to make it more user-friendly. Further studies should explore the reasons
why men were reluctant to participate in health screenings, thus enhancing the implementation of
screening programs in primary care.