The removal of aspiration objects is often required for aspiration, which takes place at the time of a video fluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF) for the assessment of dysphagia rehabilitation. We report our approach against correspondence for aspiration at VF.　　As subjects for this report, we sampled 6 patients (average age: 78.3±3.0, four males and two females) from 19 patients, who had aspiration of barium sulfate or meal with barium contrast medium at the time of VF form October 1, 2009, to March 31, 2011. For the first step of correspondence for aspiration at VF, we dealt with coughing, huffing, suction and postural drainage under the guidance of a Speech-Language-Hearing Therapist and, depending on the case, a Physical Therapist who dealt with chest physical therapy. When expectoration was found impossible, we checked to see if it was necessary to perform biphasic cuirass ventilation with a clinical engineer. We assessed the chest X-ray films and existence or non-existence of expectoration immediately after aspiration, and fever, inflammatory response, respiratory symptoms and gastrointestinal symptoms one week after the examination, and retrospectively checked the influence of aspiration.　　As a result, three patients had residue as revealed on chest X-ray films, and the three remaining patients had none. For the former three patients, we intervened in a team approach and succeeded in removing the residue from two patients (one with initial correspondence, and the other with execution by the Physical Therapist). Though two patients had fever and inflammatory response one week later, It was hardly possible that aspiration at the time of VF became a direct cause. No patient had either the respiratory or gastrointestinal symptom.　　Correspondence for aspiration was attained by establishing a team approach system. Even if a patient had heavy aspiration, it was not reflected on chest X-ray films, depending on the case, and therefore deliberation was required for correspondence.