1.The association between physical activity and depressive symptoms among japanese school children
Mitsugu Yasuda ; Miri Sato ; Daisuke Ando ; Kohta Suzuki ; Naoki Kondo ; Zentaro Yamagata
Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine 2012;61(3):343-350
In recent years, physical inactivity among children or adolescents has been a major public health concern. Although a number of studies have examined the effect of physical inactivity on depressive symptoms in adults, only few studies have examined this effect on children. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of physical activity on the development of depressive symptoms in children by using longitudinal data. The study participants were students in grades 4 to 8 in the Koshu City. Their physical activity and depressive symptoms were examined in 2008 by a questionnaire. One year later, their depressive symptoms were examined again. Students who had depressive symptoms at the baseline were excluded. Physical activity at the baseline was categorized into 3 groups as independent variables. The development of depressive symptoms was used as the dependent variable. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship. At the baseline, 1532 students completed the questionnaire. Of them, 1379 students (727 boys and 652 girls) did not have depressive symptoms. One year later, 1319 students (95.6%) completed the questionnaires on depressive symptoms. Of them, 41 (6.0%) boys and 68 (10.6%) girls had developed depressive symptoms during the study period. High physical activity was significantly associated with decreased incidence of depressive symptoms compared to low physical activity only in boys (odds ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.95). Our results suggest that high physical activity significantly affects the depressive symptoms in boys.
2.Problems in the Evaluation of Medical Interviewing Skills with Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: How Can Reasonable Objectivity Be Ensured?
Junko MURAKAMI ; Hideo TAKENAKA ; Akira HORIKOSHI ; Umihiko SAWADA ; Mitsugu SATO ; Hiroyuki OHI ; Masato MURAKAMI ; Mitsuru YANAI ; Jin TAKEUCHI ; Kazunari KUMASAKA ; Seiji YAZAKI
Medical Education 2001;32(4):231-237
Students' interviewing skills are now commonly evaluated with standardized patient-based assessment methods. Four pairs of instructors at Nihon University School of Medicine used objective structured clinical examinations to evaluate the medical interviewing skills of 122 fifth-year medical students. The results were then analyzed to improve the accuracy of rating with objective structured clinical examinations. Interrater variability was significant among the two pairs of instructors. Variability was greatest when instructors evaluated a student's performance but was minimal when they judged whether a student had carried out a task. The number of standardized patients was 8, with the average score of each standardized patient ranging from 52.5 to 73.3 (full score, 100). These results suggest that the rating process for each item should be further refined and that the standard for evaluation should be clarified.
3.Multi-Institutional Joint Study on Adverse Events of Original and Generic Gemcitabine Drugs (Gemzar® vs. Gemcitabine Sandoz) Using Propensity Score Matching
Chinami SUZUKI ; Kazuya HIURA ; Mitsugu TANAYA ; Hiroshi SATO ; Yuji KOHARA ; Akio SHIBANAMI ; Hiroaki WATANABE
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics 2020;22(1):24-29
Objective: The use of generic drugs is promoted to reduce medical costs and copayments. However, tumor agents are expensive and generic drugs are not widelyused. Thus, it is necessaryto evaluate the safetyof generic drugs in more detail. We compared the incidence of adverse events between the original drug (Gemzar®: GEM) and generic drug (Gemcitabine [Sandoz]: GE-GEM) using propensityscore (PS) matching.Methods: We investigated adverse events in patients who received one course of GEM or GE-GEM. The patient background (age,sex, BSA, cancer type, stage, metastasis, surgical history, and radiotherapy) and administration status (administration route and RDI) were used to calculate the PS.Results: Among all patients (GEM: 51, GE-GEM: 54), a significantlygreater number in the GE-GEM group had cancer metastasis. On comparison of adverse events, there were significantlymore cases of vascular pain (p<0.05) in the GEM group, and manycases of nausea (p=0.08) and rash (p=0.08). Fortypatients in each group were extracted byPS matching. There were no significant differences in the patient background between the groups, and on comparison of adverse events, the two groups did not significantly differ.Conclusion: Our studysuggested that there is no difference in side effects between Gemzar® and gemcitabine [Sandoz]. To compare the incidence of adverse events, it is useful to use PS matching in clinical practice.