Objective To assess the technical feasibility, patency and outcomes of subintimal angioplasty (SIA) for treatment of the lower extremity arteriosclerosis occlusions. Methods During the period from December 2003 to August 2008, 122 lower extremities with arteriosclerosis occlusions (median length, 10.25 cm;range, 4.5 to 28 cm) were treated on an intention-to-cure basis with SIA. Twenty-three lower extremities had disabling claudication and ninety-nine had limb-threatening ischemia. Patient history, demographics, procedural details, complications, and follow-up information were collected and analyzed. Patency, limb salvage, sustained improvement in claudication was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results The technical success rate of SIA was 83%. Following successful SIA, the mean ankle-brachial index increased from 0.19±0.11 to 0.67±0.29 (P<0.01). Primary patency at 12 and 24 months was 54%±5% and 45%±4% respectively, the clinical effective rates (rates of limb salvage and improvement in claudication) at 12 and 24 months were 82%±5% and 79%±4% respectively. No serious complications occurred. Conclusion In a selected group of patients, SIA is feasible with a high technical success rate and the clinical effective rates are satisfactory, there were no severe complications. SIA is a good treatment alternative in patients suffering from chronic ischemia with arteriosclerosis occlusions in the lower extremity.

Objective To investigate the risk factors and clinical characteristics of deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) of the lower extremities in Chinese people. Methods The clinical manifestations and risk factors in 2742 DVT patients diagnosed by phlebography were retrospectively studied. Results DVT made up 22.39% of all the venous diseases of the lower extremity. The most common clinical presentations of DVT were swelling and pain (92. 34% ), varicose vein ( 32. 57% ), pigmentation (24. 95% ) and ulceration( 18.45% ). The left lower extremity was more frequently involved. The whole limb type was 60. 09%, 80. 23% DVT patients had identified risk factors including age over 40 years old (76. 29% ), history of major surgery ( 12. 18% ) and severe trauma ( 8.42% ), pregnancy and the puerperium ( 4. 87% ). The history of general surgery ( 26. 05% ), vascular surgery ( 23. 35% ), gynaecoiogy and obstetrics (20. 96% ), orthopaedics ( 16. 47% ) and urinary surgery (7.49%) was among the most common surgery. Primary hypercoagulable syndrome was identified in 0. 22% DVT patients. Conclusion DVT makes up 22. 39% of the disease of veins of the lower extremity. The most common clinical presentations of DVT were swelling and pain. The most common risk factors were age over 40 years, major surgery, severe trauma. Primary hypercoagulable syndrome is a heritage risk factor for DVT pathogenesis.

Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the technical feasibility, safety and effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)for the treatment of severe limb ischemia caused by tibioperoneal arteries occlusion. Methods From June 2004 to May 2007,35 patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI)were treated on an intention-to-treat basis with tibioperoneal arterial PTA. Main outcome measures were technical success rate, primary patency rate, limb salvage rate and complications. Results The technical success rate of tibioperoneal arterial PTA Was 83%.Mean follow-up time was 11.5 months, primary patency rate and limb salvage rate were 57%and 82%,respectively.Mean length of tibioperoneal arterial PTA was 9.5 cm(4.5～14 cm),concurrent treatment of iliac artery or femoral-popliteal artery was carried out in 19 patients via either angioplasty or combined with stenting.There were three complications including arterial spasm and thrombosis in one, which Was relieved by thrombolysis and antispasmodics, and artery perforation in 2 cases, which was treated conservatively. Conclusion In tibioperoneal arterial occlusions in CLI patients, PTA is feasible with a high initial technical success rate and high limb salrage rate,tibioperoneal arterial PTA carries a lower morbidity and less severe complications. PTA is a safe, effective and good treatment alternative for CLI patients of tibioperoneal arterial occlusions.

Objective To assess reconstructive options for critical limb ischaemia in infrapopliteal arteries. Methods A retrospective review of all CLI patients who underwent infrapopliteal reconstruction was carried out. Patient history, demographics, procedure details, complications, and follow-up information were collected and analyzed. Patency, limb salvage rate was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results During the period (from December 2003 to January 2008 ), 123 CLI patients with arteriosclerosis occlusions were treated on an intention-to-treat basis with infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).Thirty-three thromboangiitis obliterans and twenty-three arteriosclerosis occlusions suffering CLI were treated by infrapopliteal bypass procedures. Primary patency and limb salvage rate of infrapopliteal PTA at 6, 12 and 24 months was 67%, 54%, 49% and 91%, 85%, 78% respectively, Primary patency and limb salvage rate of infrapopliteal surgical bypass at 6, 12 and 24 months was 90%, 83%, 79% and 92%,87%, 80% respectively, the patency of infrapopliteal PTA was lower than infrapopliteal surgical bypass (P ＜0. 01 ), but the limb salvage rate of infrapopliteal PTA and open surgery was no significant difference (P ＞ 0. 05 ). Conclusion Endovascular treatment (PTA) in patients with infrapopliteal arteriosclerosis occlusions and critical ischaemia is safe, effective. Infrapopliteal PTA can be used as the choice of therapy and surgical bypass reserved in those endovascular treatment failed. While in CLI patients with thromboangiitis obliterans infrapopliteal artery bypass remains the best treatment option.

With the continuous development of endovascular surgery, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has gradually replaced traditional open surgery and has become the preferred treatment strategy for Stanford type B aortic dissection. However, the disadvantage of the short proximal landing zone greatly limited the indication of TEVAR surgery and affected the prognosis. In recent years, many strategies such as hybrid surgery, in vitro fenestrated and branched aortic endo-graft, chimney technique, in-situ fenestration technique, etc., have been developed, which greatly broadens the TEVAR indication and improved the prognosis.

Objective To evaluate the application value of diode laser in situ fenestration in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of aortic arch disease.Methods The retrospective crosssectional study was conducted.The clinical data of 110 patients with aortic arch disease who underwent TEVAR using diode laser in situ fenestration in the Ninth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from January 2014 to June 2017 were collected.TEVAR using diode laser in situ fenestration was performed according to the lesion involving the three branches of aortic arch.Observation indicators:(1) surgical and intraoperative situations;(2) follow-up.All patients were followed up by outpatient examination,inpatient examination and telephone interview up to May 2017.CT angiography was performed to evaluate the patency of the stents and presence of endoleak at 3,6,and 12 months postoperatively.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x ±s.Results (1) Surgical and intraoperative situations:106 of 110 patients underwent successful TEVAR using diode laser in situ fenestration.Intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) showed that primary aortic dissection incisions were completely closed,with a patency of all stents and no fenestration-related endoleaks.The surgical success rate was 96.36％ (106/110).Two patients died of intraoperative pericardial tamponade and 2 received chimney stent implantation after complex anatomic configuration of the aortic arch inducing to failure of the innominate artery fenestration.Of 106 patients,70 received left subclavian arterial fenestration,30 received 3 aortic branches fenestration and 6 received both left subclavian arterial and left common carotid arterial fenestrations.The operation time and dose of contrast agent in 110 patients were respectively (140±9)minutes and (185±-5)mL.Four patients had postoperative complications,1 died of severe pulmonary infection and 3 with cerebral infarction were improved by anti-platelet,brain nerve nutrition and other symptomnatic treatment.Other patients had no transient ischemic attack,stroke,brain infarction,myocardial infarction or other neurological complications.Duration of hospital stay of the 110 patients was (15 ± 7)days.(2) Follow-up:99 of 107 patients were followed up for 2-17 months,with a median time of 10 months.During the follow-up,there were patencies of all stents,and endoleaks of 4 patients occurred and were closely followed up and observed.Conclusion The diode laser in situ fenestration is safe and feasible in the TEVAR for the treatment of aortic arch disease,with satisfactory short-term outcomes.

AIM: Previous studies have suggested that big stick design (BSD) method can only be used in clinical trials of two treatments with equal proportion, which has good statistical performance and has become the recommended choice of randomized methods. This study expands BSD method, so that it can be applied to three groups, and provides more randomized methods for clinical trials. METHODS: On the basis of BSD method used in two treatments with equal proportion, the derivation conditional allocation probability of BSD method used in three treatments with equal proportion was carried out. BSD method was compared with simple randomization (SR) method, permuted block design (PBD) method and block urn design (BUD) method by Monte-Carlo simulation in balance and randomness. RESULTS: In terms of balance, PBD method was the best, followed by BUD method, BSD method, and SR method was the worst. In terms of randomness, SR method was the best, followed by BSD method, BUD method and PBD method. The comprehensive performance showed that BSD method was better than BUD method, PBD method and SR method. CONCLUSION: The expanded BSD method used in three treatments with equal proportion has good comprehensive performance, and it can be the recommended randomization method for clinical trials of three treatments with equal proportion.