Objective To investigate the factors influencing positive and negative affects ot orthodontic patients.Methods 145 orthodontic patients were selected and finished questionnaire survey.The questionnaires included demographic data,psychosocial impact of dental aesthetic questionnaire (PIDAQ),aesthetic content of index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN-AC),perception of occlusion scale (POS),and positive affect and negative affect scale (PANAS).Mann-Whitney U-test,Kruskal-Walis H-test,and Spearman correlation analysis were used to analyze the relation between impact of dental aesthetics and positive and negative affects in orthodontic patients.Results The scores of adolescent patients were higher than adult patients in negative affect (U =1886.500,P＜0.05).The patients under orthodontic treatment scored higher than those before treatment (U=2228.000,P＜0.05).The subdomains of PIDAQ,such as social impact (x2=ll.794,P＜0.05),aesthetic attitude (x2 =45.853,P＜0.05),and dental confidence (x2 =33.551,P＜0.05) were related with negative affect.The scores of IOTN-AC,PIDAQ,POS demonstrated positive correlation with negative affect (P＜0.05).The scores of social impact showed negative correlation with positive affect (P＜0.05).Conclusions Adult orthodontic patients suffer more negative affect than adolescent patients.Orthodontic treatment could promote patients' positive affect.However,the negative psychosocial impact in dental aesthetics would strengthen the negative affect.

Objective To explore the related factors that might had effect on orthodontic patients' esthetic evaluation of axial dental midline angulation from three aspects which are ideal value,detectable value and tolerable value.Methods Photographs of a smiling woman was digitally manipulated to produce models with left or right maxillary axial dental midline angulations in 2° increments.These digital photographs models were used to develop an electronic questionnaire in combination with corresponding guidance for each question.The electronic questionnaire was applied to investigate the esthetic evaluation of axial dental midline angulation from 222 orthodontic patients who complied with the inclusion criteria.Esthetic evaluation included three aspects,the ideal value,the detectable value and the tolerable value,which represented the degrees of maxillary axial dental midline angulations the patients considered to be ideal,detectable and tolerable,respectively.The patients' personal information and clinical orthodontic examination results were collected as well.Results The mean detectable value and tolerable value were 4.9° and 9.7°,the median of detectable value and tolerable value were 5°and 9.5°.Logistic regression analysis was applied to explore the influence of seven factors on each evaluator's ideal value,detectable value and tolerable value.The seven factors were gender,marriage condition,education level,orthodontic treatment condition,malocclusion index,dental esthetic rating from others and from themselves.The statistical analysis indicated education level and orthodontic treatment condition were the influential factors of detectable values,while the tolerable values were influenced by the education level and gender.The ideal value converged to 0° and none of the factors had effect on it.Conclusions The education level,orthodontic treatment condition and gender are considered to be the influential factors of the esthetic evaluation of axial dental midline angulation.

Objective To explore the influential factors of esthetic evaluation of mandibular prominence by orthodontic patients from two dimensions (ideal value and tolerance range).Methods 226 orthodontic patients were investigated by an electronic questionnaire of esthetic evaluation of mandibular prominence.Binary logistic regression was adopted to analyze the influential factors.Results The tolerable boundary value for female mandibular retrognathism was affected by age (OR1.360) and orthodontic history (OR2.849).The tolerable boundary value for female mandibular prognathism and male mandibular retrognathism were found to be affected by orthodontic history (OR2.557 and 2.845,respectively).The tolerable boundary value for male mandibular prognathism was affected by age (OR1.347) and orthodontic history (OR2.310).The ideal value of male mandibular prominence was affected by age (OR1.420).Conclusions Orthodontic patients' esthetic evaluation of mandibular prominence is influenced by age and treatment condition,but not by sex,education level,marital status and personal profile.