1.Pigmentation by transdermal fentanyl patch
Hiroaki Shibahara ; Ei Sekoguchi ; Nagayuki Takeshita ; Shingo Suzuki ; Miho Morimoto ; Sachiko Inaguma ; Yoko Mori ; Sumiyo Kudo ; Yumi Ota ; Mika Nishimura ; Natsuko Uematsu ; Eri Imai ; Daisaku Nishimura
Palliative Care Research 2013;8(1):523-528
Introduction: There has been no case report in which hyperpigmentation developed on the skin area where a transdermal fentanyl patch was applied in a patient. Case report: A 43-year-old man with recurrence of postoperative rectal cancer was treated by cetuximab plus irinotecan and panitumumab plus FOLFIRI. For cancer pain, transdermal fentanyl patch (Fentos®) was administered, and radiation from behind was performed. Hyperpigmentation then appeared on the chest and the abdominal skin sites where the patches were applied. The hyperpigmentation nearly disappeared four months after the fentanyl patch was discontinued. Discussion: The cause of the pigmentation was possibly due to post inflammatory hyperpigmentation secondary to contact dermatitis. It was desirable to conduct patch test and skin biopsy for making an accurate diagnosis. Conclusion: We should pay a careful attention to hyperpigmentation of the skin where a transdermal fentanyl patch is applied.
2.Differences in gestational weight gain in accordance with Japanese and Institute of Medicine guidelines between Japanese and non-Japanese Asian pregnant women at a perinatal medical center in Japan
Chie KOH ; Takako CHIBA ; Ryoko YOSHIDA ; Misato KATO ; Maho MORI ; Akiko MORIMOTO ; Yukari NAKAJIMA ; Kanako YAMADA ; Miho FURUYAMA ; Minako SAHO ; Kaori WATANABE
Journal of International Health 2022;37(4):179-188
Objectives High gestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with perinatal risks to mother and child. Research shows that non-Japanese Asian women have higher GWG than Japanese women. However, no studies have compared GWG in these two populations using GWG recommendations in accordance with Japanese and Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. The study aim was to compare GWG in non-Japanese Asian and Japanese pregnant women.Methods This was a retrospective observational study. All participants were aged ≥20 years and gave birth between September 2019 and the end of October 2020 at one perinatal medical center in Japan. Medical record data were analyzed for 170 non-Japanese Asian and 316 Japanese pregnant women. We used t-tests and chi-square tests to examine differences in age, parity, smoking status, antenatal checkups, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and GWG. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for above- and below-recommended GWG by non-Japanese Asian and Japanese status. We also analyzed differences in delivery type, abnormal blood loss, and birth size according to GWG.Results After adjustment for confounding factors, the multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CI for GWG above the Japanese guidelines recommendations was 1.86 (1.23-2.81) and that for GWG above IOM guidelines recommendations was 2.46 (1.45-4.16) for non-Japanese Asian women, as compared with Japanese women. Conversely, the multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CI for GWG below Japanese guidelines recommendations was 1.55 (1.03-2.32) and that for GWG below IOM guidelines recommendations was 1.87 (1.26-2.76) for Japanese women, compared with non-Japanese Asian women. Conclusion Because Japanese women tend to be below recommended GWG and non-Japanese Asian women tend to be above recommended GWG, midwives need to provide careful guidance to reduce perinatal risks.