Nagara Medical Center introduced two computer systems that utilized data imputed into electronic medical records.  The first system was used to check cancer chemotherapy prescriptions, whereas the second system was a preparation support system that facilitates precise mixing of anticancer drugs.
  The prescription checking system made it possible to easily monitor the dose of anticancer drugs and dosing intervals utilizing data imputed into electronic medical records.  Using this system, the time required for checking was reduced significantly compared to without using the system.
  The preparation support system enables converting the dose of anticancer drugs that imputed into electronic medical records to the prepared amount automatically and checking of the amounts of drugs for drug preparations.  Drugs are checked by reading a bar code attached to a vial or ampule in order to check prepared drugs are correct.  The prepared amount of drug is checked by measuring the weight of a syringe used in preparation before and after preparation.  Using the preparation support system, the preparation time required was prolonged significantly compared to that without using the system.  However, questionnaire survey revealed that prolonged time was in the allowable range to ensure safety.
  In conclusion, it is considered that the prescription checking system introduced efficient checking of prescriptions, and that the preparation support system introduced an improvement in the accuracy of preparation.

PREAVOID is pharmaceutical intervention that is utilized to illustrate pharmacists’ contributions to medical care.  Currently, there is a great need for pharmacists to provide good medical services to inpatients; as a result, many pharmacists conduct pharmaceutical management in hospital wards.  However, pharmacists who have limited experience in working in the ward do not know exactly what they should check with respect to pharmaceutical management.  To resolve this problem, we determined 16 pharmaceutical-management items based on PREAVOID that was conducted at Nagara Medical Center.  Moreover, we conducted a pre-questionnaire survey assessing whether pharmacists who had worked in the ward for fewer than 4 years attended to these 16 check items in their daily work prior to our introducing the list to them.  The results indicated that pharmacists who had fewer than 2 years of experience working in wards attended to the 16 check items less than those who had more than 2 years of experience, and approximately half of the pharmacists had not received adequate guidance before beginning work at the ward.  In addition, most pharmacists indicated that clear check points were useful for conducting pharmaceutical management and the 16 check items were useful for their daily work.  These results indicate that the 16 check items are a useful educational tool for enabling pharmacists to conduct high quality pharmaceutical management from the initial stage and that using the 16 check items is superior to pharmacists only gaining this ability via prolonged experience working in the ward.